- Joined
- Jul 13, 2015
- Messages
- 4,242
- Reaction score
- 1,985
- Location
- East Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
That is right. It has "zero bearing" and anyone who thinks it does is wrong. that's how out of touch with reality you really are. Racism is no longer tolerated in America, even Paul Ryan agrees. I might be time to pack up the computer and take up golf or fishing, it is a lot more relaxing than this.
Denial of what is real...a classic liberal position.
If it has zero bearing, then why is the floor littered with race cards that were thrown all over the place by liberals claiming racism.
You hear it a hundred times a day from liberals. They have a vested interest in keeping it alive. Al Sharpton makes his money from that alone.
You are hypocritical if you think liberals would just "let it go" if a judge in a black man's case had both parents in the clan. They would be all over it.
Racism is alive and well because liberals do not want it to die. It supports their victim mentality.
That is also why the floor is littered with race cards. So much it has lost all effectiveness and meaning.
Everything they disagree with is racist, according to them.
PS...YOU are the one who is actually fishing. and badly, I might add.
That is right. It has "zero bearing" and anyone who thinks it does is wrong. that's how out of touch with reality you really are. Racism is no longer tolerated in America, even Paul Ryan agrees. I might be time to pack up the computer and take up golf or fishing, it is a lot more relaxing than this.
That lie doesen't sell anymore. All the dopes that might buy it already did and are more the fools for it.
t
What if a black man was under trial and the judge's parents used to be card carrying, cross burning KKK members.
The liberal press would be all over it screaming BIAS.
This judge gives free legal aid to illegals and is a member of La Raza, and yet some dim witts are saying it has ZERO bearing?...:bs
Nothing has or will stand in our way in the quest for true liberty and freedom. The new Bill of Rights (also called the 2nd Bill of Rights)that follow defines that freedom that all Americans are entitled to.
See if you can tell me how many we have fulfilled so far.
They are also 2 people that will be effecting your life in meaningful ways for the next decade or so so keep up the name calling. It will make it even more painful for you to bear.
I absolutely love her.
What doesn't sell anymore is you and other posters like you accusing people of lying whenever they make statements that happen to peeve you. I understand why people who share your views rely so heavily on that uncivil stratagem. Calling someone a liar is a lame, dopey substitute for a legitimate rebuttal, which would require knowledge and an ability to make persuasive arguments that people who share your views don't have.
Pocohontas Warren falsified her Indian heritage to help her chances of being admitted to law school. Like her fellow leftist Mrs. B.J. Clinton, she is a damned liar--as crooked as a dog's hind leg. But that is only fitting, because so are many of their supporters.
Read more @: Exclusive: Senator Warren to endorse Clinton, sources say
Sounds like Warren will be endorsing Hillary soon. Also its almost beginning to look like she might be a possible VP..... [/FONT]
Read more @: Exclusive: Senator Warren to endorse Clinton, sources say
Sounds like Warren will be endorsing Hillary soon. Also its almost beginning to look like she might be a possible VP..... [/FONT]
You can't really be serious right? Trump has been blasted in the media for people like David Duke supporting him. And you don't think that a judge who has connections to the KKK would face problems if he was the judge on a case where the person was black or any other minority?
I agree Trump's statements were poor at the very least. I honestly think this is another one of his moments where he says something incorrectly and of course the media jumps onto it, like they would with any other Republican. Is the judge in favor of illegal immigrants being afforded rights and benefits from America? Yes. Is he a member of a group that is associated with a far left/take America back group? Yes. Does Trump propose subjects that many illegal immigrants/ legal immigrants feel strongly against? Yes. Can you honestly say that there is no grounds for bias?
Trump did it the wrong way. I think he misspoke. He should not have done this in public most likely. And at most he should've stated that there was cause to question the judges unbiased opinion given the fact that he is a member of a group that awards illegal immigrants and a group that associates with the far left group that is blatantly about reclaiming America for the Mexican people. Simply because he is of Mexican herritage? No, that is a stupid statement and only hurts his case.
As The Post and other media outlets have pointed out repeatedly, Curiel is a member of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association, which is a professional organization for Latino lawyers. The group is the San Diego local affiliate of the California La Raza Lawyers Association, whose membership comprises lawyers practicing in California, and is a 501(c)(6) nonprofit trade organization. It has an affiliated 501(c)(3) scholarship fund that awarded 22 scholarships totaling $34,000 in 2014. More on that later.
This group is not the National Council of La Raza, the Hispanic civil rights nonprofit organization that has pushed for comprehensive immigration reform in Congress with a pathway to citizenship and legalization for undocumented immigrants. It’s often referred to as simply “La Raza,” especially in the context of the immigration debate.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/06/07/trump-supporters-false-claim-that-trump-u-judge-is-a-member-of-a-pro-immigrant-group/
To recap this simple fact: San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association ≠ National Council of La Raza.
The hero worshipping of Senator Warren has always confounded me.
I absolutely love her.
I absolutely love her.
You can't really be serious right? Trump has been blasted in the media for people like David Duke supporting him. And you don't think that a judge who has connections to the KKK would face problems if he was the judge on a case where the person was black or any other minority?
I agree Trump's statements were poor at the very least. I honestly think this is another one of his moments where he says something incorrectly and of course the media jumps onto it, like they would with any other Republican. Is the judge in favor of illegal immigrants being afforded rights and benefits from America? Yes. Is he a member of a group that is associated with a far left/take America back group? Yes. Does Trump propose subjects that many illegal immigrants/ legal immigrants feel strongly against? Yes. Can you honestly say that there is no grounds for bias?
Trump did it the wrong way. I think he misspoke. He should not have done this in public most likely. And at most he should've stated that there was cause to question the judges unbiased opinion given the fact that he is a member of a group that awards illegal immigrants and a group that associates with the far left group that is blatantly about reclaiming America for the Mexican people. Simply because he is of Mexican herritage? No, that is a stupid statement and only hurts his case.
So much for being the principled and unwavering darling of progressives. The news of her endorsement and her potential incorporation into Clinton's ticket would hopefully stimulate some introspection among progressives that will finally get them to get their heads out of their asses.
that she is a hypocritical twit doesn't bother you? she whines about overpaid executives and she gets paid for almost no teaching at a rate that could fund 6-7 assistant professors or high school teachers?
Either Trump is trying to manipulate that judge into favouring him so as to not appear biased or he's posturing for the peanut gallery, trying to lock up the below-average voters (who are exactly half of the population).
If he were serious about this bias crap he'd leave it in the hands of his lawyers (who probably have advised him to keep his trap shut because he's not doing them any favours).
It really should show them that nobody in Washington believes in their message. Especially when a career move like VP might come knocking.
Why didn't she endorse the more "progressive" candidate?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?