- Joined
- Jul 27, 2014
- Messages
- 17,226
- Reaction score
- 6,895
- Location
- Mountains
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
The investigation centers on New York City where the Clinton Foundation has its main offices, according to the former official who has direct knowledge of the activities.
Prosecutorial support will come from various U.S. Attorneys Offices — a major departure from other centralized FBI investigations.
The New York-based probe is being led by Preet Bharara, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. Bharara’s prosecutorial aggressiveness has resulted in a large number of convictions of banks, hedge funds and Wall Street insiders.
Bharara is best known for securing convictions of prominent political figures, including former New York State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver. Silver had a seemingly intractable grip on power in the state for decades. He was convicted of accepting $4 million in exchange for helping a cancer researcher and two real estate developers.
He also secured the conviction of New York Republican Majority Leader Dean Skelos, who was sentenced to five years in prison for corruption.
Other news stories are reporting that DOJ has already passed on this. It will not investigate Clinton Foundation behavior. It might look bad for our first female POTUS to be.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/11/exclusive-joint-fbi-us-attorney-probe-of-clinton-foundation-is-underway/
This is good IF it is correct.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/11/exclusive-joint-fbi-us-attorney-probe-of-clinton-foundation-is-underway/
This is good IF it is correct.
On May 15, 2009, President Barack Obama nominated Preet Bharara to become the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.
We already know that these "investigations" are rigged so I'm not sure what the point is. They investigate and the outcome is that Hillary is too stupid to use email. This one will show that she's too stupid to know that she shouldn't mix her private concerns with those of her office. I can see it now, "Our investigation has revealed that Hillary was not sophisticated enough to understand that it was inappropriate to allow foreign concerns to contribute to her charity in return for recognition from the US State Department. We do not, however, find any intent to enrich herself or her charity through these arrangements. It was all just coincidence. Granted, the odds of this being a coincidence are something like a billion to one but, hey, nobody says it can't happen."
I'm not holding my breath...
We already know that these "investigations" are rigged so I'm not sure what the point is. They investigate and the outcome is that Hillary is too stupid to use email. This one will show that she's too stupid to know that she shouldn't mix her private concerns with those of her office. I can see it now, "Our investigation has revealed that Hillary was not sophisticated enough to understand that it was inappropriate to allow foreign concerns to contribute to her charity in return for recognition from the US State Department. We do not, however, find any intent to enrich herself or her charity through these arrangements. It was all just coincidence. Granted, the odds of this being a coincidence are something like a billion to one but, hey, nobody says it can't happen."
http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/11/exclusive-joint-fbi-us-attorney-probe-of-clinton-foundation-is-underway/
This is good IF it is correct.
at some point you would think conservatives would eventually realize how easily manipulated they are. Maybe the daily caller got something right at some point in its existenece but why do you think the CF is corrupt? Oh yea, you read something in the daily caller. See the problem. If you didnt so obediently believe what they tell you maybe they'd stop lying to you.
Does 'this' along with all the other behavior regarding cyber security add up to a case which could be prosecuted? FBI...it's in your court ...again.
Even if Bharara is going after Hillary - and he's tough as nails - can he really cobble together a case before the lections? Nah, Hillary would be elected president before any investigation is completed, and therefore she'd simply scuttle any probe before the facts can come to light. There would have to be Congressional hearings on this, and it's not clear that Republicans would be in control of either house.
You hope.
What I hope is that b!tch goes to prison - along with BJ.
Bharara has nailed some big fish - the Gottis crime family, various insider traders, Bernie Madoff, etc. Unlike some of his high profile predecessors, Bharara doesn't have the political connections to vault himself someplace higher, like into politics like Giuliani, or to Washington like Comey. So he's on his way out - but before he leaves, he'll likely pursue this case - which could now become the biggest case of his life. If he brings down Hillary, he'll have made his greatest mark by bringing down his biggest fish, the Clinton Crime Family. At a minimum, that will be his legacy. If he succeeds, he may reap political rewards that allow him to pursue a path into politics.
at some point you would think conservatives would eventually realize how easily manipulated they are. Maybe the daily caller got something right at some point in its existenece but why do you think the CF is corrupt? Oh yea, you read something in the daily caller. See the problem. If you didnt so obediently believe what they tell you maybe they'd stop lying to you.
we tend to focus - with good reason - what tRump needs to do differently
team hillary needs to present a very definitive plan to show the voting public how she intends to avoid even the appearance of corruption and/or pay-to-play during her administration
http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/11/exclusive-joint-fbi-us-attorney-probe-of-clinton-foundation-is-underway/
This is good IF it is correct.
I dunno, maybe because their funds are spent more on salaries and fundraising than actual charity. There are other coincidences involving policy decisions at State and donations previous to those decisions that should be made transparent whether corrupt or not. Why do you hate transparency?
I do not see this as good.
We already know the results before they are over.
The Obama run DOJ will be ordered to find nothing wrong in a closed door discussion just like on the tarmac in Phoenix.
If anyone thinks rule of law is working under Obama, they are in for a disappointment. He uses the DOJ, who in turn order the FBI to give the results he wants.
July 5th, 2016 was the death of the concept of rule of law in the US.
The entire DOJ is directed by a Clinton appointee who works for and does the bidding of the Clintons and Obama.
Why do you think Bill Clinton met with her and she ordered the FBI to drop the whole thing less than a week later?
We are a third world country when it comes to rule of law.
I do not see this as good.
We already know the results before they are over.
The Obama run DOJ will be ordered to find nothing wrong in a closed door discussion just like on the tarmac in Phoenix.
If anyone thinks rule of law is working under Obama, they are in for a disappointment. He uses the DOJ, who in turn order the FBI to give the results he wants.
July 5th, 2016 was the death of the concept of rule of law in the US.
The entire DOJ is directed by a Clinton appointee who works for and does the bidding of the Clintons and Obama.
Why do you think Bill Clinton met with her and she ordered the FBI to drop the whole thing less than a week later?
We are a third world country when it comes to rule of law.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?