• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Exclusive: Jobs 'Saved or Created' in Congressional Districts That Don't Exist

:rofl I'm sorry if it's too confusing for you,I'll rewrite it in crayon and draw some pictures.

I never use a crayon, because its hard to keep an eraser on them. The damn thing keeps slipping off. :mrgreen:
 
I never use a crayon, because its hard to keep an eraser on them. The damn thing keeps slipping off. :mrgreen:

:rofl :rofl
 

You lads ever hear of interest?
 
I'm thinking the Clinton surplus myth needs it's own thread.

Do some research, I believe you will find that has been pretty well been beaten to death in the past. :2wave:
 
It explains it in the link I provided.

Tisk tisk....

Tell me, what is is the presidents role in regards to intergovernmental holdings? Secondly, can you explain the mechanism of which they increase?
 
Tisk tisk....

Tell me, what is is the presidents role in regards to intergovernmental holdings? Secondly, can you explain the mechanism of which they increase?

I take it you dont want to follow the link then?
 
Re: Set sail on the derailed thread about jobs.

Tisk tisk....

Tell me, what is is the presidents role in regards to intergovernmental holdings? Secondly, can you explain the mechanism of which they increase?

Tell me, what is the President's role in regards to intergovernmental holdings?

>Fix'd


JAWOHL MEIN GRAMMATIKFÜHRER!

 
I take it you dont want to follow the link then?

No, i am asking you not a link. It is getting late though, we might have to finish this in the morning.
 
Show proof

From your favorite source,[ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009[/ame] Wiki. :mrgreen:






<The Act includes federal tax cuts, expansion of unemployment benefits and other social welfare provisions, and domestic spending in education, health care, and infrastructure, including the energy sector.>

< No Republicans in the House and only three Republican Senators voted for the bill.>
 
Last edited:

The stimulus? It spent more than any tax cut will help.
 

Can I vote both? As we have seen, he is incapable of talking without a prepared speech and a teleprompter. He can't remember his earlier lies so must continually fall back on making statements like about how consistently he has told us what he is now telling us for the first time.:rofl
 

Common dude I’ve already derailed this thread enough. Now you come in with the damn Teleprompters…scoot, go derail a thread in the basement or something, leave this one alone. :shock:
 

If your so tired maybe you should go to bed or something, go take a nap, ****....
 
Common dude I’ve already derailed this thread enough. Now you come in with the damn Teleprompters…scoot, go derail a thread in the basement or something, leave this one alone. :shock:

True, you have. As a side note, you really should try reading the links those guys provided for your education. They provide a very good explanation that is almost simple enough to have been written in crayon about how budgets numbers are fudged to make people think things that aren't true. i.e Clinton had a budget surplus for 2 years. :mrgreen:
 
Last edited:

Yes but the key was that the numbers were going down,he was reducing the numbers, rather than increasing the numbers. When was the last time that was done Sherlock? :2wave:
 
Yes but the key was that the numbers were going down,he was reducing the numbers, rather than increasing the numbers. When was the last time that was done Sherlock? :2wave:

Was it Clinton or the GOP in congress? It was still just on paper
 
Was it Clinton or the GOP in congress? It was still just on paper

Even your fav source..WiKi will say the numbers went down the last two years of the Clinton administration …unless I go in and change them of course, which anyone can. :roll:

Clinton vetoed 17 bills only two were overridden, plus you had the shut down of the government in 1995 instigated by that stellar winger, Newt Gingrich. Who in his wisdom, told a room full of reporters that he “forced the shutdown because Clinton had rudely made him and Bob Dole sit at the back of Air Force One.” :2wave:

Newt was a damn fool to say such s***, that shutdown, is what cost Bob Dole and the Republicans the presidential election in 1996.
 
OMFG!~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I thought this was about ghost districts and money and all that good ****.

WTF is this **** about Clinton?

enough already!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…