- Joined
- Sep 16, 2007
- Messages
- 9,796
- Reaction score
- 2,590
- Location
- out yonder
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
:rofl I'm sorry if it's too confusing for you,I'll rewrite it in crayon and draw some pictures.
Yes and the Republicans voted against the biggest tax cut in history.So sad isn't it? :shock:
I never use a crayon, because its hard to keep an eraser on them. The damn thing keeps slipping off. :mrgreen:
2/26/2000 Not Available Not Available 5,661,579,846,114.32
12/27/2000 Not Available Not Available 5,663,706,592,936.09
12/28/2000 Not Available Not Available 5,665,928,609,714.47
12/29/2000 Not Available Not Available 5,662,216,013,697.37
01/02/2001 Not Available Not Available 5,728,739,508,558.96
01/03/2001 Not Available Not Available 5,723,237,439,563.59
01/04/2001 Not Available Not Available 5,719,452,925,490.54
01/05/2001 Not Available Not Available 5,722,338,254,319.31
01/09/2001 Not Available Not Available 5,725,066,298,944.04
01/10/2001 Not Available Not Available 5,724,315,917,828.49
01/11/2001 Not Available Not Available 5,734,110,648,665.41
01/12/2001 Not Available Not Available 5,735,197,779,458.19
01/16/2001 Not Available Not Available 5,711,790,291,567.40
01/17/2001 Not Available Not Available 5,718,517,343,351.92
01/18/2001 Not Available Not Available 5,725,695,166,475.90
01/19/2001 Not Available Not Available 5,727,776,738,304.64
Yes it was a surplus on paper only. Look here the last year of Clinton the debt went up 66 Billion
You lads ever hear of interest?
I'm thinking the Clinton surplus myth needs it's own thread.
You lads ever hear of interest?
The interest is paid every month but the principle keeps rising
It explains it in the link I provided.
Tisk tisk....
Tell me, what is is the presidents role in regards to intergovernmental holdings? Secondly, can you explain the mechanism of which they increase?
Tisk tisk....
Tell me, what is is the presidents role in regards to intergovernmental holdings? Secondly, can you explain the mechanism of which they increase?
Source for this statement?
I take it you dont want to follow the link then?
Show proof
From your favorite source Wiki. :mrgreen:
<The Act includes federal tax cuts, expansion of unemployment benefits and other social welfare provisions, and domestic spending in education, health care, and infrastructure, including the energy sector.>
< No Republicans in the House and only three Republican Senators voted for the bill.>
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The stimulus? It spent more than any tax cut will help.
It's a lie, because PBO is claiming that hundreds of thousands of job have already been saved by the stealfromus money that has already been spent.
PBO's own recovery chief says that those numbers can't be verified, yet PBO has touted them as accurate for several weeks now. Now, either PBO is lieing, or he's just stupid.
Can I vote both? As we have seen, he is incapable of talking without a prepared speech and a teleprompter. He can't remember his earlier lies so must continually fall back on making statements like about how consistently he has told us what he is now telling us for the first time.:rofl
Check it out.:2wave:
Hhmm…I sure didn’t know that socialist liked giving tax cuts like this” $282 billion" in tax cuts over two years. :shock:
Using a favorite Fox news standby “Some Would Say” that giving cuts like that, to the Middle-Class is the biggest middle class Tax Cut In History. Sure don’t sound like socialism to this tired old driver.
Common dude I’ve already derailed this thread enough. Now you come in with the damn Teleprompters…scoot, go derail a thread in the basement or something, leave this one alone. :shock:
True, you have. As a side note, you really should try reading the links those guys provided for your education. They provide a very good explanation that is almost simple enough to have been written in crayon about how budgets numbers are fudged to make people think things that aren't true. i.e Clinton had a budget surplus for 2 years. :mrgreen:
Yes but the key was that the numbers were going down,he was reducing the numbers, rather than increasing the numbers. When was the last time that was done Sherlock? :2wave:
Was it Clinton or the GOP in congress? It was still just on paper
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?