- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Earlier this morning, Sammy Benoit asked me how it felt to live in a much larger Minnesota, with new Congressional districts popping up all over. Any thrill of getting extra representation in Congress got muted by the fact that the Obama administration apparently added more phantom Congressional districts (440) than actually exist now (435), and that they somehow showed $6.4 billion in Porkulus money going to these nonexistent districts. Watchdog.org has tracked down the massive failure to check data at Recovery.gov, the reporting arm of Porkulus for the White House:
Hot Air Blog Archive $6.4 billion in Porkulus money spent in phantom districts?
We have to realize that Chicago Politics have been brought to the White House.
Con men depend on the fact that nobody will check the information they put out there.
I just don't understand in this 24 hour news cycle how they can think that nobody will check how many congressional districts are in a particular state.
The question is, is where did the money really go?
The lieing is not the big story here, we expect them to lie, the story is where did the money go.
Made up people in a made up district can't spend it.
Does any of this really surprise anyone here?
Isn't it interesting that this thread has fallen to the bottom of the news?
This should shock and amaze all americans, your government is not even trying to hide their corruption anymore, they think you all fools!:shock:
I think we all know the Libbos weren't going to spend much time on this thread...:rofl
Because it's a pointless thread. The reports will be allocated to the appropriate districts and this will be a non-issue. Try to find something more substantial to bash Obama on, there are plenty of topics out there.
Here is one example of incorrect allocation ABC found:
"For example, recovery.gov says $34 million in stimulus money has been spent in Arizona's 86th congressional district in a project for the Navajo Housing authority, which is actually located in the 1st congressional district."
It appears to be errors of the receipt submissions having the wrong district on them. Recovery.gov was just failing in quality control of the receipts submitted for their reports.
This issue will bring down this administration, the corruption in this "stimulus package" is alarming, and we have only begun to scratch the surface.
Waterloo.....this is it!
Where is the corruption? I haven't seen anything to suggest the receipts were deliberately labeled incorrectly or that, if the receipts were submitted correct, the data was deliberately inputted incorrectly.
Because it's a pointless thread. The reports will be allocated to the appropriate districts and this will be a non-issue. Try to find something more substantial to bash Obama on, there are plenty of topics out there.
Here is one example of incorrect allocation ABC found:
"For example, recovery.gov says $34 million in stimulus money has been spent in Arizona's 86th congressional district in a project for the Navajo Housing authority, which is actually located in the 1st congressional district."
It appears to be errors of the receipt submissions having the wrong district on them. Recovery.gov was just failing in quality control of the receipts submitted for their reports.
Because it's a pointless thread. The reports will be allocated to the appropriate districts and this will be a non-issue. Try to find something more substantial to bash Obama on, there are plenty of topics out there.
Here is one example of incorrect allocation ABC found:
"For example, recovery.gov says $34 million in stimulus money has been spent in Arizona's 86th congressional district in a project for the Navajo Housing authority, which is actually located in the 1st congressional district."
It appears to be errors of the receipt submissions having the wrong district on them. Recovery.gov was just failing in quality control of the receipts submitted for their reports.
Great question Mason, and it should be the only question. I think that would be a scandal that will end up being part of what brings demo's down for a long, long time.
j-mac
Where is the corruption? I haven't seen anything to suggest the receipts were deliberately labeled incorrectly or that, if the receipts were submitted correct, the data was deliberately inputted incorrectly.
Because it's a pointless thread. The reports will be allocated to the appropriate districts and this will be a non-issue. Try to find something more substantial to bash Obama on, there are plenty of topics out there.
Here is one example of incorrect allocation ABC found:
"For example, recovery.gov says $34 million in stimulus money has been spent in Arizona's 86th congressional district in a project for the Navajo Housing authority, which is actually located in the 1st congressional district."
It appears to be errors of the receipt submissions having the wrong district on them. Recovery.gov was just failing in quality control of the receipts submitted for their reports.
Damn gibberish, you spoiled their circle jerk, just as they were having so much fun too. :rofl
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?