Ivanka Trump, the eldest daughter and a senior adviser to President Donald Trump, defended her use of a private email account while transitioning to an administration job, insisting to ABC News in an exclusive interview on Tuesday "there's no connection between" her situation and Hillary Clinton's email scandal.
Speaking with ABC News' Deborah Roberts in Wilder, Idaho, where she's promoting STEM initiatives alongside Apple CEO Tim Cook, Ivanka Trump maintained that all of the emails on her private account were properly archived and contained no classified information. She is adamant they bear no resemblance to Hillary Clinton's email scandal, which her father eagerly and frequently condemned as part of his campaign for president.
"All of my emails are stored and preserved. There were no deletions. There is no attempt to hide," she said, adding, "There's no equivalency to what my father's spoken
about."
https://abcnews.go.com/US/exclusive...ivate-email-brushes-mueller/story?id=59455437
Thus far, the belief that Ivanka preserved all of her emails per Federal record keeping laws and transmitted no classified data appears to come from Ivanka herself, so there's zero reason to assume that she followed the law at all.
And since Republicans won't be able to address this issue without making it about Hillary Clinton, it's clear that only a Democratic-controlled House investigation is qualified to investigate Ivanka's use of private email accounts, along with everybody else in the Trump Administration who has done so. Every Republican/Conservative in this thread will make the issue about Clinton, thus proving my point that Republicans are unqualified to address the issue.
Lock her up.
What law did she break?
https://abcnews.go.com/US/exclusive...ivate-email-brushes-mueller/story?id=59455437
Thus far, the belief that Ivanka preserved all of her emails per Federal record keeping laws and transmitted no classified data appears to come from Ivanka herself, so there's zero reason to assume that she followed the law at all.
And since Republicans won't be able to address this issue without making it about Hillary Clinton, it's clear that only a Democratic-controlled House investigation is qualified to investigate Ivanka's use of private email accounts, along with everybody else in the Trump Administration who has done so. Every Republican/Conservative in this thread will make the issue about Clinton, thus proving my point that Republicans are unqualified to address the issue.
At issue is that by using a private email account it's difficult (though I doubt impossible) to very that she followed Federal record keeping laws, and it's difficult (thought I doubt impossible) to verify that she didn't transmit classified data. That is why a thorough House investigation (one controlled by Democrats) is needed.
At issue is that by using a private email account it's difficult (though I doubt impossible) to very that she followed Federal record keeping laws, and it's difficult (thought I doubt impossible) to verify that she didn't transmit classified data. That is why a thorough House investigation controlled by Democrats is needed.
If all her emails were stored in the government server, nothing was deleted and no classified material was trannsmitted, then there's no crime.
If the emails were properly stored (which is what is claimed) then it'll be a very short investigation; one that's already occuring, no doubt.
Is there evidence that classified information was sent over the server or is this another fishing trip with the hope of uncovering something. If there is no evidence let the witch hunt begin.
What law did she break?
A thorough investigation is required to verify that all her email were, in fact, actually stored in a proper government service. Thus far the only reason we have to think that they were comes from Ivanka herself, who of course has zero credibility.
Ergo why a thorough investigation is required.
You might start with "The Presidential Records Act" (Wikipedia is a good place to START learning about the situation).
If Ms. Trump DID NOT breach that act, then (most likely) Ms. Clinton didn't either.
If Ms. Trump DID breach that act, then whether Ms. Clinton did as well still has to be determined.
Whether the Republican leadership honestly believes that Ms. Clinton breached that act, is indicated by the number of investigations which the Republican majorities in the House of Representatives and the Senate have initiated into Ms. Clinton's conduct.
[HINT - The MORE investigations, the MORE likely it is that the Republicans honestly believe in their accusations and the FEWER investigations, the LESS likely it is that the Republicans honestly believe in their accusations. So far the Republican majorities in the House and Senate have initiated ZERO investigations. From the fact that the Republican majorities have initiated ZERO investigations, it is possible to deduce that there is (likely to be) ZERO likelihood that the Republicans honestly believe in their accusations.]
You always ask this like a parrot in every thread.What law did she break?
Is there evidence that classified information was sent over the server or is this another fishing trip with the hope of uncovering something. If there is no evidence let the witch hunt begin.
And you know how that server was found? An investigation of why she had a private email account in the first place.Apples and oranges: Clinton set up a private server specifically intended to circumvent the law.
Ivanka, didn't.
Big difference.
Every Republican/Conservative in this thread will make the issue about Clinton, thus proving my point that Republicans are unqualified to address the issue.
Apples and oranges: Clinton set up a private server specifically intended to circumvent the law.
Apples and oranges: Clinton set up a private server specifically intended to circumvent the law.
Ivanka, didn't.
Big difference.
You always ask this like a parrot in every thread.
Apples and oranges:
And you know how that server was found? An investigation of why she had a private email account in the first place.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander, the Democrats should investigate Ivanka, and see if she's been using the WH to conduct private business.
What law did she break?
Apples and oranges: Clinton set up a private server specifically intended to circumvent the law.
Ivanka, didn't.
Big difference.
When Ivanka's private server is discovered...let us know.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?