- Joined
- Sep 17, 2013
- Messages
- 48,281
- Reaction score
- 25,273
- Location
- Western NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Letting them die is the same decision Obama arrived at also.
no orders to hold an understaffed, non firebase, at Any cost.
Letting them die is the same decision Obama arrived at also.
Which is, of course, another lie. Obama did not "let them die." There was nothing he could do to save them. But that doesn't matter to you, who has no qualms about using four dead Americans as props to attack the President.
Oh Boo hoo for you. He did let them die in favor of covering it up so that it didn't hurt the campaign ...
That's nonsense. Hackish garbage.
Translation: it's the truth.
If anything, it would only have been a conscious decision to not make a decision about something, which led to nothing being done to avoid or stop the event which then transpired.What you said makes zero sense on its face. You think that Obama made a conscious decision to deny help and allow the embassy to be stormed, just so he could cover it up later? That's utterly ****ing asinine. Quite literally one of the stupidest things I've ever read. Congratulations.
In fact there were people ready to move in an instant and all they needed was word from the Commander in Chief. But the C in C was packing for his fund raising in Vegas and ignored them.Which is, of course, another lie. Obama did not "let them die." There was nothing he could do to save them. But that doesn't matter to you, who has no qualms about using four dead Americans as props to attack the President.
What you said makes zero sense on its face. You think that Obama made a conscious decision to deny help and allow the embassy to be stormed, just so he could cover it up later? That's utterly ****ing asinine. Quite literally one of the stupidest things I've ever read. Congratulations.
In fact there were people ready to move in an instant and all they needed was word from the Commander in Chief. But the C in C was packing for his fund raising in Vegas and ignored them.
What is it that you believe Barrack Obama did to try and save these men?
And there was nothing those people could have done to help the four who died. This has been well established.
There was nothing he could do. This has been well established.
Are you kidding? It's still being told today as though it were valid by people in here.
And as a result of testimony being given under oath more than a law has indeed been broken.
What's silly? The President goes into hiding, Ben Rhodes tells the President, the Sec Of State and the UN Ambassador to say a video was behind this 'protest' and that's just what they do. Ben Rhodes, a political press guy, is pulling the strings behind the curtains on this hapless bunch.
:roll::roll::roll:
Well established by whom? Ben Rhodes again?
In fact there were people ready to move in an instant and all they needed was word from the Commander in Chief. But the C in C was packing for his fund raising in Vegas and ignored them.
Since they never tried, we'll never know. It's one thing to say you tried, and it's totally another to say it wasn't worth the effort, so we didn't even bother.
on the other hand
the quote is "do. or do not. there is no try."
i did not know our military system can not act without the go ahead of the president.
They were waiting, ready to go, for the order that never came..
Yes, it's odd that a member of the Muslim Brotherhood should get a copy of that memo but not the American media or the American people.
Which is, of course, another lie. Obama did not "let them die." There was nothing he could do to save them. But that doesn't matter to you, who has no qualms about using four dead Americans as props to attack the President.
Translation: it's the truth.
In fact there were people ready to move in an instant and all they needed was word from the Commander in Chief. But the C in C was packing for his fund raising in Vegas and ignored them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?