• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Evidence of EXPLOSIVES in the WTC complex.

Sorry but I'm not the one who doubts what they claim.

If you doubt them, it's up to you to prove otherwise......lol

You stundie are the one here that NEEDS contact the FDNY ... are you scared then ???

For YOU are the one citing them as supposedly referring to explosives themselves ... that the SOUNDS of exploSIONS they heard come from exploSIVES themselves.

That therefore is YOU putting meaning to their words so it is actually YOU that NEEDS TO VERIFY that YOUR interpretation of their words is the correct one ... yet you squirm and deflect from what is YOUR responsibility ... WHY do you all do that, is just CONTACTING them and ASKING them if they actually "meant" they thought they heard explosives themselves too hard or scary for you to do or something ???

Seriously ... Why would you NOT wish to VERIFY your claims they meant bombs themselves ... would having that confirmation to ram down our debunker throats not be relished then ???
 
Large debris would also be followed by the sound of other debris falling too.

There is no other sound of debris falling and this was long after the collapse of the buildings.

And don't take my word for it, there are plenty of people who were at GZ who said they heard explosions, so it's not my logic, its the logic of those who were at GZ.

Let me see, who do I believe? The words of those at GZ......or......some random interweb pantomime debunker who wasn't there?? lol

Who would you trust?? lol

Wee hint ... hearing exploSIONS is NOT automatically proof they heard exploSIVES themselves.

Some also described the noises as LIKE "express trains thundering by" ... so by YOUR truther logic then trains were involved too.

People described Mt.St.Helens as LIKE a "nuclear bomb went off" and as an "explosion" too ...so again by YOUR truther logic it must have been a nuclear blast they saw and heard.

Learn what SIMILES and METAPHORS are ... people saying something is "like" a bomb does NOT automatically mean they actually meant an actual bomb.
 
Wee hint ... hearing exploSIONS is NOT automatically proof they heard exploSIVES themselves.

Some also described the noises as LIKE "express trains thundering by" ... so by YOUR truther logic then trains were involved too.

People described Mt.St.Helens as LIKE a "nuclear bomb went off" and as an "explosion" too ...so again by YOUR truther logic it must have been a nuclear blast they saw and heard.

Learn what SIMILES and METAPHORS are ... people saying something is "like" a bomb does NOT automatically mean they actually meant an actual bomb.

This precisely correct... we don't have a robust vocabulary to describe extreme loud noises... and few can distinguishes the source of one from another... Common ones might be subway trains, jet engines... but who has heard a building collapse? A building CD? a car gas tank exploding? Even TNT? Many haven't even heard a transformer explode. And there is no sound in the vacuum of space either!

But Hollywood and TV special effects is what informs people about what things sound like. Sound like is not SOUND IS... either,
 
You stundie are the one here that NEEDS contact the FDNY ... are you scared then ???

For YOU are the one citing them as supposedly referring to explosives themselves ... that the SOUNDS of exploSIONS they heard come from exploSIVES themselves.

That therefore is YOU putting meaning to their words so it is actually YOU that NEEDS TO VERIFY that YOUR interpretation of their words is the correct one ... yet you squirm and deflect from what is YOUR responsibility ... WHY do you all do that, is just CONTACTING them and ASKING them if they actually "meant" they thought they heard explosives themselves too hard or scary for you to do or something ???

Seriously ... Why would you NOT wish to VERIFY your claims they meant bombs themselves ... would having that confirmation to ram down our debunker throats not be relished then ???

Pretty sure you know as well as I do the reason he wont do that.
 
Back
Top Bottom