• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"Everyone welcome" is now unacceptable.

How is everyone welcome not neutral.

Because many conservatives have the opposite opinion, especially in a state like Idaho. For example, many conservatives do not welcome the children of illegal immigrants into government-run schools. Do you support allowing conservative teachers to put a sign up expressing that opinion?

No, you don't, because asking a leftist to be intellectually consistent is like asking a cat to file your taxes - both entertaining and hopeless.

From the article:

Inama's sign was said to have violated the school's "content neutral" policy, which prohibits any speech or messaging that might reflect personal opinions, religious beliefs, or political ideologies.
 
Because many conservatives have the opposite opinion, especially in a state like Idaho. For example, many conservatives do not welcome the children of illegal immigrants into government-run schools. Do you support allowing conservative teachers to put a sign up expressing that opinion?

No, you don't, because asking a leftist to be intellectually consistent is like asking a cat to file your taxes - both entertaining and hopeless.

From the article:

That's a stretch.

One could object to a "Be Kind" sign on the basis that some people would rather be hateful.
 
That's a stretch.

One could object to a "Be Kind" sign on the basis that some people would rather be hateful.

Do you believe conservatives would object to a "Be Kind" sign? I don't.

Again, here's the policy:

Inama's sign was said to have violated the school's "content neutral" policy, which prohibits any speech or messaging that might reflect personal opinions, religious beliefs, or political ideologies.

The sign the teacher put up is definitely sending a subtle political message, especially with all of the border and immigration nonsense going on today. Idaho is one of the most conservative states in the country.
 
Do you believe conservatives would object to a "Be Kind" sign? I don't.

Why are they the benchmark? I object to a "Return Your Library Books" sign. It sends a subtle political message that the state legitimately controls a means of communication through coercion.

Again, here's the policy:



The sign the teacher put up is definitely sending a subtle political message, especially with all of the border and immigration nonsense going on today. Idaho is one of the most conservative states in the country.
 
At least the mask-off nature of Republican bigotry and white supremacy can no longer be debated, at least amongst serious people.

The cultists will continue to insist they aren't racist while they are literally doing the racism.
This ^^^ 💯%
 
No big loss. The other teachers will continue about their business, welcoming everyone, without the need for a sign to remind them to do so.
 
That is a horrible sign for young kids to see because it implies that only her classroom is safe and that America is a horrible place.

I would have had this traitor arrested if it were up to me.

If she hates America so bad she can get the **** out.
Yeah, I feel the same way about puting the ten commandments in classrooms.
 
Because many conservatives have the opposite opinion, especially in a state like Idaho. For example, many conservatives do not welcome the children of illegal immigrants into government-run schools. Do you support allowing conservative teachers to put a sign up expressing that opinion?

No, you don't, because asking a leftist to be intellectually consistent is like asking a cat to file your taxes - both entertaining and hopeless.

From the article:
I see. I sure hope i never have you as a neighbor. Unbelievable.
 
No big loss. The other teachers will continue about their business, welcoming everyone, without the need for a sign to remind them to do so.
God forbid. Teachers are in demand much like factory workers.
 
This is a terrible story to see teachers in the crossfire with these anti-DEI overreactions. "Everyone is welcome" becoming a political problem is absurd.
 
This is a terrible story to see teachers in the crossfire with these anti-DEI overreactions. "Everyone is welcome" becoming a political problem is absurd.

It's so absurd that I don't discount the possibility of the orders to remove that sign being a political stunt.
 
No big loss. The other teachers will continue about their business, welcoming everyone, without the need for a sign to remind them to do so.


Conservatives don't like signs?

Like employees must wash hands when leaving a bathroom?
 
The ****ing fascist assholes can go **** themselves. Especially dear leader the orange ****ing Jesus scumbag piece of shit.

This is outrageous and disgusting. All decent people must stand up and stop this wave of destruction while we still have a country we can be proud of. D, E, and I are what make this country great.
 
Conservatives don't like signs?

Like employees must wash hands when leaving a bathroom?
Do you often forget that people of different races are welcme in your presence, and therefore require a sign to remind yourself?
 
Especially at the elementary school level. The solution there is more pay.
I agree. My daughter taught at a charter school for 6 months after graduation. Liked the kids but just not worth it considering the pay, work and time involved. I'm glad she had the experience.
 
It's so absurd that I don't discount the possibility of the orders to remove that sign being a political stunt.

In trying to research the story all I could find is articles written from the position of the teacher, and also another who also resigned for the same reasons, but very little from the state. So I acknowledge we do not have all the info on this.

But, at face value I do not understand how "everyone is welcome here" as a banner in the classroom is a problem. It is not even a DEI statement in the sense of colleges and so forth looking at who gets opportunity. Just a classroom level statement on no one is excluded.

I am truly baffled as to why this is the thing for a state to go after a teacher for.
 
That is a horrible sign for young kids to see because it implies that only her classroom is safe and that America is a horrible place.

I would have had this traitor arrested if it were up to me.

If she hates America so bad she can get the **** out.

Just checking in, did this get you the attention you were obviously craving, or can we expect more gems in this thread?
 
In trying to research the story all I could find is articles written from the position of the teacher, and also another who also resigned for the same reasons, but very little from the state. So I acknowledge we do not have all the info on this.

But, at face value I do not understand how "everyone is welcome here" as a banner in the classroom is a problem. It is not even a DEI statement in the sense of colleges and so forth looking at who gets opportunity. Just a classroom level statement on no one is excluded.

I am truly baffled as to why this is the thing for a state to go after a teacher for.
1000001651.webp
 
In trying to research the story all I could find is articles written from the position of the teacher, and also another who also resigned for the same reasons, but very little from the state. So I acknowledge we do not have all the info on this.

But, at face value I do not understand how "everyone is welcome here" as a banner in the classroom is a problem. It is not even a DEI statement in the sense of colleges and so forth looking at who gets opportunity. Just a classroom level statement on no one is excluded.

I am truly baffled as to why this is the thing for a state to go after a teacher for.

I agree that the sign could hardly be more innocuous.

Which is why I don't discount the possibility I spoke of.
 
Do you believe conservatives would object to a "Be Kind" sign? I don't.

Again, here's the policy:



The sign the teacher put up is definitely sending a subtle political message, especially with all of the border and immigration nonsense going on today. Idaho is one of the most conservative states in the country.

If "everyone is welcome" has become a "political message" in America, just burn the whole ****ing thing down, you guys are cooked.
 
Do you often forget that people of different races are welcme in your presence, and therefore require a sign to remind yourself?

Don't all life's matter?

No child left behind

No shirt no shoes no service

Bigots are bigots, they need reminders of how to behave in public
 
Back
Top Bottom