- Joined
- Aug 21, 2009
- Messages
- 19,045
- Reaction score
- 6,960
- Location
- Pindostan
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
The ddistrictis in fact bigoted for saying that "everyone is welcome here" is not content nuetral.
If the claim is the district is bigoted for forcing her to take it down then you’re admitting that her sign was not content-neutral, correct? Like the district policy said it should have been?
Its bigoted because it implies that everyone is not welcome.
So the the sign meant people outside her classroom were bigots, ergo it was political, right?
Right the district is wrong.
One would hope the people who wrote their own policies and enforced them would understand them.
The sign expresses national education policy and federal law.
But the point you missed is federal civil rights policy is not content neutral. It has a definite political purpose and agenda. Dividing the country based on race isn’t it, or, at least, that wasn’t the intent when the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was written.
People that see a sign saying "Everyone is welcome here" as problematic dont need to be near our kids.
Just follow the policy. Simple.
