Your claim:but it didnt. It didnt adress the point of my podt at all.
thats a lie.
Thats the claim I've been making the whole time.
You just weren't paying attention or didn't understand
Good lord.Agreed. I think the sign itself was innocuous, but then she may have been teaching the children in the classroom completely open borders and that illegal immigration is fine. If she was an activist for illegal immigration, she should not be teaching in public schools.
Good lord.
Unfortunately this is true and many of these people don’t want anything but to give evil and then spend time trying to overcome evil in return so they can give themselves a feeling of righteousness.I guarantee they're going to start saying "well if you call us evil it doesn't matter so we'll just be evil."
Everything else, even the dumbest versions of it, lines up with the abuser's playbook.
One wonders if this comes before or after she changes their sex.
Context?Your claim:
If tolerance required tolerance of intolerance it would be self contradictory
Yes and I said it doesn't have anything to do with my point though.I gave an example of intolerance being tolerated, and you agreed with it.
Not even closeYour claim was proven false.
Context?
We were talking about this thread. Intollerance of people. Racism bigotry.
Not ice cream.
Yes and I said it doesn't have anything to do with my point though.
Not even close
The point is, to suggest that 'tolerance requires one to be tollerant of the Klan or the Nazis (who are the embodiment of intollerance)'....is contradictory.
No. That was the subject of this conversation from the beginning.You added that Klan and Nazi part as race baiting after your more general, Humpty Dumpty claim was proven false with your agreement.
No. That was the subject of this conversation from the beginning.
Your lack of reading comprehension is the issue.
That wasn't the only statement.If tolerance required tolerance of intolerance it would be self contradictory
My reading comprehension must be pretty damn bad. I see nothing in that statement of yours about Nazis or KKK.
The statement simply isn't true.
That wasn't the only statement.
Context.
The entire conversation has been about intollerance, not of ice cream, but of people, black people gay people, etc
I have explained that to you over and over going back to Friday (post 476 and 485, for example) yet you still dont get it
Your lack of understanding is kind of amazing.
If tolerance required tolerance of intolerance it would be self contradictory
In the context it was made it is not false.Your statement:
It's false.
In the context it was made it is not false.
Nonsense.The statement stood alone in a post by itself.
The statement is correct.The statement is false. Trying to say it is true in some cases, just exposes it as false in its categorical form.
The ****ing fascist assholes can go **** themselves. Especially dear leader the orange ****ing Jesus scumbag piece of shit.
6th-grade teacher resigns rather than remove absolutely harmless sign from her classroom
Then she shared her blistering resignation letter with her local paper.www.upworthy.com
The sign is a statement of both national education policy and federal law.So she wanted a “sanctuary classroom,” eh? Keep the innocent little hearts and minds in her safe-space corner of the planet free from all of those terrible Trumpian bigots roaming those other classrooms and schools across America?
Why do progressives think that that’s educational and not a political statement that doesn’t belong in a 6th-grade world civ class?
No, it's true.@NolanVoyd
This statement is false:
If tolerance required tolerance of intolerance it would be self contradictory
No, it's true.
to suggest that 'tolerance requires one to be tollerant of the Klan or the Nazis (who are the embodiment of intollerance)'....is contradictory.
I didn't change the point.You change the statement to include race baiting, and insist it's still true. After earlier admitting it isn't.
I didn't change the point.
That is what I've been saying the whole time.
I've been explaining that tobyou since Friday (see posts 476 and 485).
In the context it was made it is absolutely true.If tolerance required tolerance of intolerance it would be self contradictory
Still not a true statement.
The sign is a statement of both national education policy and federal law.
The district is in the wrong to tell her to take it down.
Those responsible need to find another line of work.
In the context it was made it is absolutely true.
to suggest that 'tolerance requires one to be tollerant of the Klan or the Nazis (who are the embodiment of intollerance)'....is contradictory.
I love how "trumpian bigots" infer so much from a simple everyone welcome sign. No wonder people different than themselves such as the LGBTQ community makes them apoplectic.So she wanted a “sanctuary classroom,” eh? Keep the innocent little hearts and minds in her safe-space corner of the planet free from all of those terrible Trumpian bigots roaming those other classrooms and schools across America?
Why do progressives think that that’s educational and not a political statement that doesn’t belong in a 6th-grade world civ class? Maybe because the philosophy is get their minds when they’re young so their hearts will follow?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?