Goldman Sachs runs the treasury.
Obama is a puppet.
There's a cemetery somewhere in Arizona where they just dug 30,000 fresh graves, which wait now for the revolution.
Baxter International — a major Obama contributor — developed a vaccine for bird flu that actually kills people.
Google Congressman Alcee Hastings and House Bill 684 and you'll see that they're planning at least six civilian labor camps.
Google an article in the San Francisco Chronicle about train cars with shackles.
The communist dictator Hugo Chavez way back in 2004 purchased the Sequoia software that runs our voting machines and the mainstream media won't report any of it — not even Fox because Saudi Arabia bought a percentage of Fox in 2007.
Didn't the left or some on the left make similar claims about Bush?
Didn't the left or some on the left make similar claims about Bush?
Point is that a very high percentage of Republicans in the South believe in this junk.
So the response is the whole "Well Democrats beleived in that one poll that Bush knew beforehand about 9/11?". Well, not exactly. You see as the question was framed, and poorly worded, it was in fact accurate. Democrats were asked was Bush prior to 9/11 warned. Well let's see, was he warned? Thinking....thinking...thinking....
Oh that's right, the August NSC briefing that told him that al-Qaeda was planning to hijack planes to fly them into buildings. So, was Bush warned? Yes. So could a Democrat thus conclude that Bush had prior warning? Yes. So should they have answered that Bush had prior warning? Well there is a yes again.
Ok...so a liberal started a "birther" thread.....
Yeah, that's the way to put an end to the madness....:roll:
Intriguing that you didn't argue the point about starting a birther thread. So why are you keeping this little bit of lunacy alive?That would be accurate if I was a liberal nice try painting everyone who disagrees with you with the same broad stroke
Intriguing that you didn't argue the point about starting a birther thread. So why are you keeping this little bit of lunacy alive?
No I didn't read the article. I don't need an Esquire article to tell me she's a dumb blonde who banged her head on the dashboard several times too many. That's common knowledge.Did you read the article?
That's pretty much bull****. I would challenge you to prove otherwise, but I know that's a vain request.Point is that a very high percentage of Republicans in the South believe in this junk.
I would like evidence of this. Do you have any or is my request in vain?
A whopping 58 percent of Republicans either think Barack Obama wasn't born in the US (28 percent) or aren't sure (30 percent). A mere 42 percent think he was.
That means a majority of Republicans polled either don't know about -- or don't believe the seemingly incontrovertible evidence Obama's camp has presented over and over and over that he was born in Hawaii in '61.
It also explains why Republicans, including Roy Blunt, are playing footsie with the Birther fringe.
Surprise, surprise: Birther sentiment was strongest in the South and among the 60-plus crowd - presumably because seniors can't log on to the Internet and rely on rumor, word of mouth and right-wing talk radio.
When do we start a serious dialog about the Birther movement being a proxy for racism that is unacceptable to articulate in more direct terms?
In all 77 percent of Americans overall think the president is actually an American.
Do you believe that Barack Obama was born in the United States of America or not?
Yes 77
No 11
Not sure 12
How do those numbers break down?
Yes No Not sure
Dem 93 4 3
Rep 42 28 30
Ind 83 8 9
Northeast 93 4 3
South 47 23 30
Midwest 90 6 4
West 87 7 6
18-29 88 4 8
30-44 72 14 14
45-59 82 8 10
60+ 69 17 14
This is just rambling. :lol:
I didn't know exactly where to post this so here's the article.
Obama Birth Certificate Update - Latest on Obama Birth Certificate - Esquire
Discuss:
Some key quotes
That's pretty much bull****. I would challenge you to prove otherwise, but I know that's a vain request.
Yes No Not sure
Dem 93 4 3
Rep 42 28 30
Ind 83 8 9
Northeast 93 4 3
South 47 23 30
Midwest 90 6 4
West 87 7 6
18-29 88 4 8
30-44 72 14 14
45-59 82 8 10
60+ 69 17 14
You're using numbers from the Daily Kos?
58 percent of GOP not sure/doubt Obama born in US
Compare the South to the Northeast, or West.... or you get the picture. Sorry, but the White Southerner is an ignorant fool who just happens to be a member of which party now?
You're using numbers from the Daily Kos?
Yeah. Fail.
Take your own advice, junior.So refute it with evidence, otherwise you have now succedded in ...
EPIC FAIL
The only "bull****" here is coming from you. Sorry, you get a F for today.
Didn't the left or some on the left make similar claims about Bush?
You know, at least the Rev is consistent. Article about righties, and first thing he says is "hey, didn't some one else do it", as if that makes it ok.
Point is that a very high percentage of Republicans in the South believe in this junk.
So the response is the whole "Well Democrats believed in that one poll that Bush knew beforehand about 9/11?". Well, not exactly. You see as the question was framed, and poorly worded, it was in fact accurate. Democrats were asked was Bush prior to 9/11 warned. Well let's see, was he warned? Thinking....thinking...thinking....
Oh that's right, the August NSC briefing that told him that al-Qaeda was planning to hijack planes to fly them into buildings. So, was Bush warned? Yes. So could a Democrat thus conclude that Bush had prior warning? Yes. So should they have answered that Bush had prior warning? Well there is a yes again.
The Rasmussan poll was flawed in many ways, and is not the one you want to use to try and compare apples and oranges of lunacy.
This is ****ing hilarious.
You dismiss a poll done by a real polling company because you think the question was biased. You then try to prove your other point by citing a poll commissioned by daily kos which is equally, if not more, slanted.
This is of course after you express shock and disbelief that someone as prominent in Republican circles as [some crazy bitch who is neither an elected official nor anyone of import] is spreading conspiracy theories, despite the fact that mainstream democrats have long espoused ridiculous ****ing theories about Bush.
Michael Moore made a goddamn movie accusing Bush of complicity in 9/11. Was he reviled and shunned by the left for being a crazy conspiracy theorist? No, he was invited to the ****ing democratic convention by a former Democratic president.
You're reminding me more and more of Champs every day.
No I didn't read the article. I don't need an Esquire article to tell me she's a dumb blonde who banged her head on the dashboard several times too many. That's common knowledge.
Now, you do realize you failed to answer my question, don't you? Why are you sustaining this birther nonsense?
This is ****ing hilarious.
You dismiss a poll done by a real polling company because you think the question was biased. You then try to prove your other point by citing a poll commissioned by daily kos which is equally, if not more, slanted.
This is of course after you express shock and disbelief that someone as prominent in Republican circles as [some crazy bitch who is neither an elected official nor anyone of import] is spreading conspiracy theories, despite the fact that mainstream democrats have long espoused ridiculous ****ing theories about Bush.
Michael Moore made a goddamn movie accusing Bush of complicity in 9/11. Was he reviled and shunned by the left for being a crazy conspiracy theorist? No, he was invited to the ****ing democratic convention by a former Democratic president.
You're reminding me more and more of Champs every day.
Well, obviously you can not "****ing" read (yes, I am quoting you on that!). How hard is it really to figure out the first? Do you special help on this? Is there maybe someone who can read it to you, or explain that the question was flawed? Did I dismiss the Rasmussen results? Hint..it is all on how you frame the question. Maybe give it a try and re-read the question, then look at the widely discussed Aug. 6th PDB. Getting it now? Need time to think this through? I know it must be a real difficult one to crunch through a thick skull.
If you do not care for Results 2000, either come up with factual reason to dispute, or admit your party is a bunch of ignorant hicks and racists.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?