• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Eric Coomer Explains How "Adjudicators" Can Alter Votes In Dominion Voting System

Actually, they screwed up the redactions and left his name in the bookmarks of the PDF.. I'm not joshing you... the guys claims have no merritt... ;)

He is another BS artist who has convinced the rubes in the Trump camp that he has any idea WTF he is talking about...
Sincerely, do you have any info that he is not trustworthy as a source? He signed an affidavit, until penalty of charges of perjury. If he lied, he could be jailed.
 
Sincerely, do you have any info that he is not trustworthy as a source? He signed an affidavit, until penalty of charges of perjury. If he lied, he could be jailed.
Yeah, I'm sure he did sign such an affidavit.

lol
 
Sincerely, do you have any info that he is not trustworthy as a source? He signed an affidavit, until penalty of charges of perjury. If he lied, he could be jailed.


I can tell you right off the bat that the 305th MI battalion sounds impressive until you realize its a TRAINING battalion that doesn't do real intelligence work.. His network analysis is amateurish at best and not conclusive of anything. I believe I have identified him on LinkedIn and can assure you, he will be brutalized upon cross examination.

Edit: It looks like he has now deleted his LinkedIn account... LMAO... Too late.... :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

So much for his cyber sleuthing skills... :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
Sincerely, do you have any info that he is not trustworthy as a source? He signed an affidavit, until penalty of charges of perjury. If he lied, he could be jailed.

So did Flynn, he's not having any difficulties though for what he did - lying to the Feds AND admitting it!
 
Sincerely, do you have any info that he is not trustworthy as a source? He signed an affidavit, until penalty of charges of perjury. If he lied, he could be jailed.

Trump, his legal team, his allies, and his supporters bear the burden of proof, especially if what is being asked is to overturn an election in which 153 million people voted.

That's a big ask. Come to the table with some credible, persuasive evidence. Not a mentally ill lawyer who doesn't know how to spell.

Trump and his allies have lost won 1 of the past 38 cases.

It's a joke. It's a pathetic joke, and at this point, it seems like you're just trolling everyone.
 
The spelling errors at the top were too obvious, I think she played the liberal media and fooled them into covering the filing.

Here's one of the highlights. Have you seen this? I know it's the Epoch Times, but it's based on an affidavit she filed.


Here's a video covering the story, the link may require some sort of registration...



Sidney added nothing of worth to her filing.

Here is a LINK covering truth in reality.

 
Sincerely, do you have any info that he is not trustworthy as a source? He signed an affidavit, until penalty of charges of perjury. If he lied, he could be jailed.

So the dude, what is his name, signed that affidavit before the judge hearing the case?

Do you know who can really produce substantive evidence that their voting systems worked, worked properly, and that their company has met substantive official scrutiny?

Dominion Voting Systems, that is who.
 
The spelling errors at the top were too obvious, I think she played the liberal media and fooled them into covering the filing.
So what would you accept as evidence of her incompetence? If she had filed a spellchecked and grammatically sound lawsuit, would she then have appeared incompetent to you? Of course not.

There is no evidence you would accept for her incompetence. Evidence of incompetence, is reinterpreted as evidence of competence, because conspiracy theories are evidence resistant.
 
So the dude, what is his name, signed that affidavit before the judge hearing the case?

Do you know who can really produce substantive evidence that their voting systems worked, worked properly, and that their company has met substantive official scrutiny?

Dominion Voting Systems, that is who.
The “dude” is an ex-military official, who will go to jail if he is lying in an affidavit and making false accusations about hostile foreign nations accessing our voting machines.

He claims to have scientific evidence that a network in China accessed the Dominion server, and also traced an Iranian IP address.
 
The “dude” is an ex-military official, who will go to jail if he is lying in an affidavit and making false accusations about hostile foreign nations accessing our voting machines.

He claims to have scientific evidence that a network in China accessed the Dominion server, and also traced an Iranian IP address.

We are continuing to wrongly legitimize this nonsense. When does this garbage go to Conspiracy Theories next to "911 Was in Inside Job"?
 
The “dude” is an ex-military official, who will go to jail if he is lying in an affidavit and making false accusations about hostile foreign nations accessing our voting machines.

He claims to have scientific evidence that a network in China accessed the Dominion server, and also traced an Iranian IP address.

He outlines his "scientific evidence" in his declaration.... It's laughable and typical of someone with just enough networking knowledge to convince themselves they know what they are talking about but quickly destroyed by real experts.

What courts allow filing redacted declaration in advance without a motion to seal?

Why did the person in question suddenly delete their LinkedIn account?
 
Last edited:
The “dude” is an ex-military official, who will go to jail if he is lying in an affidavit and making false accusations about hostile foreign nations accessing our voting machines.

Not unless the affidavit was sworn and signed and given to a court of law.

Is this the "ex-military official" that lied about being a data scientist or is this a different "ex-military official"

I am a retired military official, does that make my comments on here worth more?
 
Not unless the affidavit was sworn and signed and given to a court of law.

Is this the "ex-military official" that lied about being a data scientist or is this a different "ex-military official"
I created a thread specific to this affidavit. It was signed, and I presume, given to a court of law, so he can be jailed if he is lying. Especially given the subject matter here.

 
Here's a link to the actual affidavit.


Couple of notes.

1. An affidavit with the name redacted is meaningless.
2. The 305th is a training unit - essentially, basic training for military intelligence. They don't perform operations.
 
The “dude” is an ex-military official, who will go to jail if he is lying in an affidavit and making false accusations about hostile foreign nations accessing our voting machines.

He claims to have scientific evidence that a network in China accessed the Dominion server, and also traced an Iranian IP address.

Why would he go to jail?

Please produce the signed affidavit with full text and content of what he actually swore to in that document.

I am betting what he swore to in any legitimate affidavit he signed is vastly different to what he claimed elsewhere.
 
I created a thread specific to this affidavit. It was signed, and I presume, given to a court of law, so he can be jailed if he is lying. Especially given the subject matter here.


That link does absolutely nothing in producing the affidavit; not the text and content or the name of the alleged expert?

In other words that link is a nothing burger.

:ROFLMAO:
 
Here's a link to the actual affidavit.


Couple of notes.

1. An affidavit with the name redacted is meaningless.
2. The 305th is a training unit - essentially, basic training for military intelligence. They don't perform operations.

Really curious he listed a training battalion... Very similar to what someone would do if they failed out of MOS training at said battalion and spent their remaining Army commitment as a wheeled vehicle mechanic.. 😄
 
The “dude” is an ex-military official, who will go to jail if he is lying in an affidavit and making false accusations about hostile foreign nations accessing our voting machines.

He claims to have scientific evidence that a network in China accessed the Dominion server, and also traced an Iranian IP address.

Trump can pardon him though, so there's no risk to him if he lies.
 
OK so where is the affidavit text?, where is this specific lawsuit text?
 
@ReubenSherr

Why didn't Biden win Utah and Florida? You do know that the Dominion Voting System was used to calculate the Florida and Utah elections, right?
Might as well ask why the Dems didn't win enough Senate seats in States where the Dominion voting system was operated.

Answer: There is nothing wrong with the equipment.
 
The right-wing doesn't seem to comprehend that the Dominion Voting System was used in multiple states, like in Utah and Florida. I wonder why they didn't rig the election in either of those states.
And over 70 million voters used Dominion machines and software in 2016 so that makes Mr. One and dones election suspect doesn't it?

But the key facet to this claim is that Dominion software is not just vulnerable to mass hacking but designed to engineer it. What you have to ask yourself is, why have 27 states, many of them controlled by Republicans, turned their elections over to a communist-controlled software program designed to manufacture Democratic votes? And one that, according to Giuliani, has been engaged in a systematic international vote fraud scheme for the better part of two decades? For that matter, if the Chavista-China-Soros conspiracy is able to manipulate voting totals through its Dominion software, why didn’t they produce the handful of votes they needed to stop Donald Trump in 2016? Or, for that matter, to throw a few more Senate races the Democrats way?
It’s worth recalling that, just a few weeks ago, Giuliani allegations of serious misconduct by Joe Biden that large segments of the commentariat deemed substantive enough to demand reporters cover respectfully. Now he is raving about a secret communist computer program to control the U.S. government. And he has been deputized to make this claim on behalf of the man who is, for the next two months, the president of the United States.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/202...e-fraud-election-conspiracy-theory-crazy.html

 
Back
Top Bottom