• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Epstein scandal broadens as trove of letters from famous figures published

Lord of Planar said:
LOL.

The only way that is possible is if you are a stalker, and have listening and video devices where they live and work.

Nobody causally shares their dirty or forbidden secrets.
Click to expand...
Sometimes I think many of the liberal posters here have never interacted with real people in real life. Almost nobody talks about their sex acts. Not even the ordinary/legal ones. Last time I can recall is some loudmouth bragging in high school about something that likely never even happened.
 
Cosmo said:
Sometimes I think many of the liberal posters here have never interacted with real people in real life. Almost nobody talks about their sex acts. Not even the ordinary/legal ones. Last time I can recall is some loudmouth bragging in high school about something that likely never even happened.
Click to expand...
Yep. Most adults keep such things private.
 
reinaert said:
Cool. You're on record mansplaining why it's mean to ick Chomsky for fawning over a rapist 11 years after everyone knew he was a sex pest.
Click to expand...
I am mansplaining for you that calling, writing a letter, visiting a criminal does not mean the crime that he committed, somehow rubs off on you. I encourage people who want to continue a relationship with someone who committed a crime and is incarcerated, to do so whether it is robbery, murder, assault, or rape. All that matters is that you keep yourself safe, and encourage efforts at reform while you do so.

You evidently need this manspained, so I was happy to oblige. You need me to mansplain anything else?
 
Clinton flew on Epstein's plane many times, and he is mentioned in court documents as many times as Trump is mentioned, according to the court documents that I have seen. Yet, even considering the documented information, below, it doesn't seem to me that Clinton (or Trump) would be attracted to little girls. However, I could believe it as to Joe Biden, considering what I have seen on C-span video, of Biden and congress member's children, and grandchildren.

"Billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein once told one of his victims that Bill Clinton “likes them young”, according to dramatic testimony revealed in court documents unsealed for the very first time.

Dozens of Epstein associates were unmasked on Wednesday after a judge ordered the unsealing of court documents in a now-settled lawsuit brought by abuse victim Virginia Giuffre against Epstein’s accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.

Among the hundreds of pages of filings, another victim Johanna Sjoberg spoke about what she knew about Mr Clinton’s ties to Epstein as part of a 2016 deposition that also made allegations against Prince Andrew."

Epstein told victim Bill Clinton ‘likes them young’, new ...​

 
btthegreat said:
I am mansplaining for you that calling, writing a letter, visiting a criminal does not mean the crime that he committed, somehow rubs off on you. I encourage people who want to continue a relationship with someone who committed a crime and is incarcerated, to do so whether it is robbery, murder, assault, or rape. All that matters is that you keep yourself safe, and encourage efforts at reform while you do so.

You evidently need this manspained, so I was happy to oblige. You need me to mansplain anything else?
Click to expand...
Ah, ok, these weren't dinner parties with a known child sex criminal with a first edition of Lolita on prominent display, they were concerned interventions. A safe place with fancy canapés.
 
btthegreat said:
I am mansplaining for you that calling, writing a letter, visiting a criminal does not mean the crime that he committed, somehow rubs off on you. I encourage people who want to continue a relationship with someone who committed a crime and is incarcerated, to do so whether it is robbery, murder, assault, or rape. All that matters is that you keep yourself safe, and encourage efforts at reform while you do so.

You evidently need this manspained, so I was happy to oblige. You need me to mansplain anything else?
Click to expand...
True story, brah.
 
Lord of Planar said:
How many of those letters are dated after 2016? The Woody Allen letter has no date on it.
Click to expand...
It's right in the main article:

"The letters, written to Epstein by a number of high-profile individuals, were reportedly compiled as a birthday gift for Epstein’s 63rd birthday in 2016."

Now, I know yagonna quibble compiled.

But, fourteen years after the first allegations, eleven years after an investigation opened, 10 years after an indictment, and eight years after guilty.

They all knew.
 
Lord of Planar said:
Then maybe we should start holding the media accountable for slander, and narratives to a story than are not fact.

I am a proponent of the first amendment, but when it becomes slander, I think it needs to be curtailed.

Look at how the OJ story was riddled with suggestive premises that had no proper facts. Same with the reporting of politics today.
Click to expand...
Umm you cannot legislate away opinions. The media has simply reported news, and Trump has actually been the beneficiary of sane washing from the media. Just this past week he's promised drug prices will be down by 1500% and was tottering on top of the wh babbling about nukes. Joe Biden had a bad debate performance and for weeks aging in America was the topic at hand.

Its hilarious that your response to an 80 year old who has spent his very public life committing crimes that it's the media's fault we think he's a lowlife.
 
Sven Karma said:
Ah, ok, these weren't dinner parties with a known child sex criminal with a first edition of Lolita on prominent display, they were concerned interventions. A safe place with fancy canapés.
Click to expand...
No they were letters, snail-mail Emily post style communications more common before the internet. .
 
reinaert said:
It's right in the main article:

"The letters, written to Epstein by a number of high-profile individuals, were reportedly compiled as a birthday gift for Epstein’s 63rd birthday in 2016."

Now, I know yagonna quibble compiled.

But, fourteen years after the first allegations, eleven years after an investigation opened, 10 years after an indictment, and eight years after guilty.

They all knew.
Click to expand...
And the 'bad' thing they did, is what exactly? I am sure you can manspain the harm those birthday letters caused.
 
reinaert said:
It's right in the main article:

"The letters, written to Epstein by a number of high-profile individuals, were reportedly compiled as a birthday gift for Epstein’s 63rd birthday in 2016."

Now, I know yagonna quibble compiled.

But, fourteen years after the first allegations, eleven years after an investigation opened, 10 years after an indictment, and eight years after guilty.

They all knew.
Click to expand...
And don't forget. The victims know who abused them sexually, including Maxwell.
 
btthegreat said:
No they were letters, snail-mail Emily post style communications more common before the internet. .
Click to expand...
Special letters for their special chum, "compiled as a birthday gift for Epstein’s 63rd birthday in 2016." Referencing 'enjoying your table' (Barak), 'dinner parties' (Allen) and 'lunches' Kraus.

But I don't know who 'Emily post' is so do have away at mansplaining that reference of yours.
 
why did the Guardian use this picture ? the article was supposed to be on "Epstein scandal broadens as trove of letters from famous figures published" but instead they used it as a hate Trump smear



1754490649039.webp
 
hecatmoggie said:
why did the Guardian use this picture ? the article was supposed to be on "Epstein scandal broadens as trove of letters from famous figures published" but instead they used it as a hate Trump smear



View attachment 67583445
Click to expand...
Maybe because the ****ing president is a child ****er? That is a much bigger fish then Woody Allen, no?
 
Sven Karma said:
Show me on the doll where the mean liberal article hurt your fee-fees.
Click to expand...
Love how they still say liberal media lies after the news they follow had to payout 750 mil for lying.
Just a weird group of people MAGA is
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom