- Joined
- Mar 7, 2018
- Messages
- 68,960
- Reaction score
- 22,530
- Location
- Lower Mainland of BC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
If they are lying about where they came from that is one thing. But the OP mentioned lying about "covid status" which is different than lying about travel or point of origin. The latter is required apart from the epidemic. People for example traveling to the UK from Yemen or Somalia---- well, if they are lying about that, there is probably a reason other than a virus.
So then back to "lying about covid status". How does the state prove someone lied about exposure to a virus that half the people don't even know they have been exposed to or have had and then threaten a 10 year prison sentence on top of that? Where does the burden of proof then lay; with the state or the incidental traveler to the UK to guarantee they aren't infected? Because it says, 10 years in prison--- a harsh sentence, usually reserved for serious felonies and not such vagaries as some slippery health "status".
Because if you want to create an atmosphere where visitors to your country are less than honest and truthful for fear of being denied entry especially to work or immigrate to, then keep drumming up the idea that if they are being honest, then they will be flatly denied anyway, so why not chance lying?
Since the requirement is the production of a record of recent test, the lying would involve the production of a false record of recent test.
Obviously, the ONLY answers to the question "Have you been exposed to COVID-19 within the past _[fill in the blank]_ days?" are
1. "Yes."
and
2. "I don't know."
and that is because the most common means of contracting COVID-19 is through the inhalation of airborne droplets and, unless you know for a fact that you were in contact with a person who had COVID-19 you have absolutely no idea whose expired air you were breathing and whether or not those people had COVID-19.The "burden of proof" is satisfied by the production of an ACCEPTABLE certificate of recent testing. If there is no such acceptable certificate of recent testing, then the "burden of proof" is satisfied by being tested and having a negative result showing that you were not exposed to COVID-19.
Hey, it ain't rocket science.