Not really. Clear evidence does the trick. Without it then there's just stories.
No, you just have to produce evidence, which has never been done in all the years of this "election fraud" lie.
There are mountains of clear evidence. It is all being ignored or explained away. There have been zero investigations...except one...and nothing was ever done about the undeniable indications of election fraud in that case.
But you have never produced any evidence.
It's actually easy to prove in court with evidence, but after 60+ tries with even Trump appointed judges ruling against some of those cases and Trump supporter-funded investigations not finding evidence, the whole "cover up" excuse doesn't hold much water. People will believe all sorts of things, but what validates beliefs are evidence they're valid.
Wrong.
Many of those "technicalities" were lack of standing, and lest we forget that much of the rhetoric the attorneys were spewing magically changed once in the court room.
Thank you for agreeing with what I said about those "60 court cases".
I didn't because you snipped out the relevant part, and then seem to forget the task of the attorneys is ensuring they have standing to begin with. That you snipped out the inconvenient part that shatters your narrative is pretty funny. So when Giuliani apologized for lying about public comments regarding the Georgia election workers committing fraud, was he lying? Was he also lying when he was saying one case was a fraud case publicly and then when in court, he did a 180 and said it wasn't a fraud case?
I have no doubt. But the guy is from South Africa.
He fell off many cliffs before he even climbed the Trump cliff.
Challenged in court more than 50 times - all dismissed without merit and/or evidence.
Yes, the coverup is invisible. That's how Musk knows the truth.