- Joined
- Feb 2, 2022
- Messages
- 13,033
- Reaction score
- 5,328
- Location
- The Twilight Zone
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Hunter can advise on the best way to snort cocaine off of hookers' asses...Maybe you'd rather have Hunter give a few words, since he was on the board of a energy company?
A lower price benefits that guy when he fills his tank.
Then why does it matter who said it?The issue isn't his resume'. The issue is whether he's correct or not. He is correct.
It doesn't. It's just interesting that it's Musk, because he appears to be good at almost everything he touches. His track record is rather impressive.Then why does it matter who said it?
Did you build that straw man from your own plans?Maybe you'd rather have Hunter give a few words, since he was on the board of a energy company?
It doesn't. It's just interesting that it's Musk, because he appears to be good at almost everything he touches. His track record is rather impressive.
Fox news is independent as well, at least from the official GOP.LOL - all those are indpendent outfits, right? Except foxnews?
That depends on what you consider short term. Certainly, more can be produced in the short term via new drilling than can be produced in what you termed the "long term" through expansion of wind and solar.How much oil is on the global market everyday? How much do you imagine could be produced in the short term by issuing new permits?
Musk became rich and famous because he is smart, knowledgeable and wise, and highly capable. He isn't just viewed as smart, knowledgeable and wise because he is rich and famous.Musk's rich and famous so obv, duh.
Rich and famous means Musk's ethical, smart, knowledgeable, and wise too.
I feel like I went over this already.
No he didn't. He cut off new land leases. Existing land leases are............existing. Oil companies are not using them. Why would new leases be issued when existing leases remain untapped?He didn't "cut off exporting." He cut off "drilling." Are you not getting this?
That depends on what you consider short term. Certainly, more can be produced in the short term via new drilling than can be produced in what you termed the "long term" through expansion of wind and solar.
But we are producing about 10% less oil than in 2018, so we should be able to increase about million barrels a day fairly quickly. That's about 5-6 times the amount of crude oil we get from Russia. So, we could cut Russia off completely, and still produce about 800,000 more barrels per day than we import from Russia.
I see you know nothing about me.Keep justifying your hatred for the American people. The American people demand access to affordable domestically produce energy, and you want to deny them that because you hate America and democracy.
A single oil leak is not going to poison drinking water.I see you know nothing about me.
for one thing I an NOT against oil pipelines as long as they are not put where they can do massive harm to people and their water supply when they leak, and with Tar sand oils and the company that was building the XL pipeline it would not have been IF they leaked but when they leak.
The company that was going to build the XL section of the Keystone pipeline does NOT have a very good records for keeping oil especially tar sand oil inside their pipes,
Tar sand oil is very corrosive and starts eating away at the pipe the moment it touches the pipe,
the people asked if they could run it where their other pipelines were already and they didn't want to do that if they had it could have been built by now.
it looks like YOU are so ANTI AMERICAN you want to let a Canadian oil company maybe destroy the drinking water of MILLIONS and MILLIONS of American families or even Kill American people by poisoning somebody with something that is in Tar sand oil just so they can make a profit?
are you really that anti American?
again they have even said MOST of the Tar sand oil they were going to be transporting in that pipeline was going to the Gulf to be shipped over seas.
TAR SAND OIL is not a "affordable domestically produce energy, " product WE produce WE import it from Canada and again we do NOT use very much of it here
Have a nice day
LOL, that isn't accurate, as Biden's measures reduced the amount of oil drilling.No he didn't. He cut off new land leases. Existing land leases are............existing. Oil companies are not using them. Why would new leases be issued when existing leases remain untapped?
YOU ARE ANTI AMERICAN!!!Oil industry is no threat to the drinking water. This is a lie told by eco-extremists.
It's quite accurate. And Biden has no control over private company drilling operations.LOL, that isn't accurate, as Biden's measures reduced the amount of oil drilling.
are YOU really that stupid?A single oil leak is not going to poison drinking water.
YEPWhat, so you care about trees now? Gimme a break. They run out of fields and rooftops where you're from?
again just what " hurdles" has Biden enacted that are still in place?New wells can be delivering oil to refineries in one month if Biden would remove all hurdles.
You don't mean back when Trump was in and the Saudi's and Russians had their price war and were almost giving it away and our oil producers shut a lot of their wells down and put political pressure on Trump to go to the Saudi's and tell them to cut their production and RAISE prices or we would stop their military aidit's a no-brainer......we should never have stopped from the git-go......oh wait......why did we stop......oh yeah, they were selling it to us a half the price we can produce it for........hmmmmm, that sounds familiar
You suddenly don't care about trees? To serve your immediate POLITICAL AGENDA. You like helping the Chinese dominate energy?What, so you care about trees now? Gimme a break. They run out of fields and rooftops where you're from?
Contrary to internet mythology, Musk was born rich.Musk became rich and famous because he is smart, knowledgeable and wise, and highly capable. He isn't just viewed as smart, knowledgeable and wise because he is rich and famous.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?