Bruh.
Proportional representation more exploitable than the FPTP that is domineered by vote splitting and routinely produces wildly undemocratic results? On what planet?
These were the options offered. From Wikipedia...
The referendum asked voters to rank three proportional representation voting systems in order of preference: Voters ranked one, two, or all three systems.[26]
dual-member proportional representation (DMP)
mixed-member proportional representation (MMP)
rural–urban proportional representation (RUP)
Dual-member proportional is an electoral system designed to produce proportional election results across a region by electing two representatives in each of the region's districts.[52][53] The first seat in every district is awarded to the candidate who receives the most votes, similar to first-past-the-post voting. The second seat is awarded to one of the remaining district candidates so that proportionality is achieved across the region, using a calculation that aims to award parties their seats in the districts where they had their strongest performances.[54]
Mixed-member proportional is a mixed electoral system in which voters get two votes: one to decide the representative for their single-seat constituency, and one for a political party. Seats in the legislature are filled firstly by candidates in local ridings, and secondly, by party candidates based on the percentage of nationwide or region-wide votes that each party received.[57]
Rural–urban proportional is a hybrid-proportional system designed by Fair Vote Canada to meet the challenges of Canada's geography.[64][11] As put forward for the BC referendum, it would use mixed-member proportional representation (MMP) in rural areas and the single transferable vote (STV) in urban and semi-urban areas.[51][65][66] Sweden, Denmark and Iceland use voting models with similar hybrid approaches. In Canada from the 1920s to the 1950s, the provinces of Alberta and Manitoba used a hybrid rural–urban system where STV was used in large cities and the alternative vote was used in single-member rural districts.[2]:81–82[64][67]
Maybe you know a better alternative, or maybe you can explain how one of those offered was better than the status quo.