-I- do not.Why do you find its existence a problem?
Not not true.Not true
You have apparently missed Goobieman's point.Why do you find its existence a problem?
I think anybody reading your postings realizes that.
Why do you find its existence a problem?
You yourself say it's why Israel is to blame for all of the conflicts over there.
-I- do not.
But then, I am not stating that Israel's nukes are the #1 threat to the ME, or agreeing with that statement.
The statement itself is utterly unsupportable.
I dont understand how you could have possibly interpreted my post in such a manner.Are you saying that its ok for all nations to have nukes as long as they are nations you like?
This statement has absolutely no connection to Goobieman's post or reasoning.Are you saying that its ok for all nations to have nukes as long as they are nations you like?
If you are incapable of understanding simple english, then :2wave:
:rofl
You still have not answered his question! :doh
ahh, yes I have, but it seems some posters have comprehension difficulties.
I dont understand how you could have possibly interpreted my post in such a manner.
He has explained his reasoning, why would you assume that it is simply because he 'likes' Israel?You seem to imply that despite the power of the nuclear weapon, since it is Israel holding it in the Middle East then it is ok.
ElB is exactly right. And every Iranian Mullah, Shiite Cleric, Sunni terrorist organization, and Pakistani Premier.....need to understand this as well. Your actions...Gentlemen...your jihads and your threats...need to realize, nukes are the biggest threat. And yer gonna have some inserted in orifices you don't want blocked and then ignited, they'll make a whole new Jewish holiday at your expense. They'll give it some fancy name and party for weeks on your tombstones.
What say we concentrate on a Palestinian State and genuine peace in the region. Let's agree Israel is gonna be there every morning..and move on.
Otherwise.....:july_4th:
Kidnapped because they intended to free palestinian men held without trial.
Doh my irony meter over modern history's wars just explodinated. Halucinating... MAI LAI... over again... pant wheeze cough
"And they rain rockets on homes its true. But Israelis knock homes and villages in half (literally) with an illegal wall and illegal territory grabs"
"In response to rockets, yeah, so let's keep firing those."
Pfft, cause the rational thing to do to stop a rocket that flies hundreds of feet in the air is build a cement wall. You just proved against yourself that the actions israel takes are not to defend itself but marginalise palestine.
"I believe Israel has been quite tolerant to the Palestinians..."
It's like you don't get that israel is an expansionist zionist state who believes that it has the right to all the land that the palestinians occupy thus expanding itself aggressively through the use of neighborhood projects geographically designed to undermine the economy of the palestinians. They don't allow aid to enter the country they don't allow imports or exports to happen and they are poor as dirt as a result. They control the utilities, like the electricity and the water and they shut them on and off with impunity. You don't get that the israeli army is made up of conscripted racist kids who run over cars with their tanks out of mean-spiritedness, who take pot shots at the civilians of palestine over the walls of the security fence - daily - so they cannot farm the lands they have occupied for centuries.
I watch BBC and Al-jazeera because al-jazeeras foreign corespondency is superior to any domestic american service (who simply do not have the money for a good number of foreign correspondents)
How do I imply that?You seem to imply that despite the power of the nuclear weapon, since it is Israel holding it in the Middle East then it is ok.
Oh, so he's a terrorist and a terrorist supporter? Still waiting for you to prove these bold assertions. I wait with baited breath, though I'm sure I set myself up for disappointment.El Baradei is a terrorist supporter. Nothing he says can be taken seriously.
Oh, so he's a terrorist and a terrorist supporter? Still waiting for you to prove these bold assertions. I wait with baited breath, though I'm sure I set myself up for disappointment.
He's attacking Israel instead of doing his job. That shows support for terrorists. He's attacking Israel instead of working with to disarm Iran. That makes him a terrorist.
Now stop with your psycho-babble.
...
ElBaradei CANNOT be allowed to muddy the message about the threat posed by Iran's nuclear program. He is trying to do exactly that! Therefore, he clearly has sided with the terrorist government of Iran. This makes his a terrorist.
I'm sorry I frankly, having studied nuclear deterrence theory think that Iran has the right to deter a nuclear strike from Israel. This will keep either side from launching a nuke. Iran will not be able to launch a nuke without a guaranteed strike by a nuclear Israel. Neither side can fire. Two bad countries with bad nukes is better than one bad country with a nuke.( I studied it years ago Im prolly rusty but the concept is basic ) Sounds to me like alot of things people say around you probably strikes you as support for terrorists.
I'm sorry I frankly, having studied nuclear deterrence theory think that Iran has the right to deter a nuclear strike from Israel. This will keep either side from launching a nuke. Iran will not be able to launch a nuke without a guaranteed strike by a nuclear Israel. Neither side can fire. Two bad countries with bad nukes is better than one bad country with a nuke.( I studied it years ago Im prolly rusty but the concept is basic ) Sounds to me like alot of things people say around you probably strikes you as support for terrorists.
You haven't really kept up have you?
Rafsanjani laid out the Mullah point of view several years ago in regards to nuking Israel. The Mullah point of view is that the potential cost of retaliation is worth it as they can wipe out the Jews, but the Jews cannot prevent the Ummah from eventual triumph.
This is preposterous.
This assumes that without a nuclear deterrent holding Israel in check, they're an offensive nuclear threat.
Yet, if they do have nukes, they've had them for decades, with no neighbors having a nuclear deterrent against them.
If they were an offensive threat, we'd know by now. This moral equivalence game is sheer buffoonery.
I need a source on that. plz.
.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?