• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Egypt the latest to feel terroristic blows

cnredd said:
Testify, teach!

The Liberal Borg doesn't understand "tough love"...These are the same people that don't keep score at baseball games because it might make somebody feel bad.
Do people who write this anti-liberal crap get an erection doing so? It sure seems to excite them to bash half the country.

Ever notice that Democrats do not write statements that are full of crap like the statement I quoted? Read it again? Name calling, stupid analogies that are pointless and untrue. Why? I can only think that there must be some weird sexual rush that these people get because why else would they make up stuff that is so untrue?

Do you see any facts in the above statement? NO! Do you see any attempt at a debate? NO! Do you see any level of intelligence? NO! The remark is pointless and written for only two reasons, to get pats on the back from others who share the Liberal bashing philosophy and to try to anger their opponents. What a great debate this is! Good job!

It seems, based on the quality of the post, that our honorable opponents have popped their wad and have nothing left, they're hanging limply in the wind.

I would prefer to see some level of intelligence displayed and a sincere attempt to debate the issues of the day. Is that beyond the capability of some of you? Is it a stretch to actually believe that our political opponents have the capability to have a debate without general Liberal bashing?

I for one would appreciate the upgrade....
 
26 X World Champs said:
Do people who write this anti-liberal crap get an erection doing so? It sure seems to excite them to bash half the country.

Ever notice that Democrats do not write statements that are full of crap like the statement I quoted? Read it again? Name calling, stupid analogies that are pointless and untrue. Why? I can only think that there must be some weird sexual rush that these people get because why else would they make up stuff that is so untrue?

Do you see any facts in the above statement? NO! Do you see any attempt at a debate? NO! Do you see any level of intelligence? NO! The remark is pointless and written for only two reasons, to get pats on the back from others who share the Liberal bashing philosophy and to try to anger their opponents. What a great debate this is! Good job!

It seems, based on the quality of the post, that our honorable opponents have popped their wad and have nothing left, they're hanging limply in the wind.

I would prefer to see some level of intelligence displayed and a sincere attempt to debate the issues of the day. Is that beyond the capability of some of you? Is it a stretch to actually believe that our political opponents have the capability to have a debate without general Liberal bashing?

I for one would appreciate the upgrade....

Pot calling kettle black?
 
26 X World Champs said:
Do people who write this anti-liberal crap get an erection doing so? It sure seems to excite them to bash half the country.
According to Pew Research, 20% of the country is liberal, not 50% like you claim....You have a lot less friends than you thought you did, eh?

26 X World Champs said:
Ever notice that Democrats do not write statements that are full of crap like the statement I quoted? Read it again? Name calling, stupid analogies that are pointless and untrue. Why? I can only think that there must be some weird sexual rush that these people get because why else would they make up stuff that is so untrue?
Here is a previous post of mine relating to Supreme Court Nomination Roberts...

Remember when I asked if I should wait 24 hours and post people's "smear" comments?....Here we are after THREE HOURS...many sources

a partisan right wing tool
He's a mob lawyer, plain and simple
he's the perfect cookie cutter conservative mimicking the party line.
This nomination is as "in your face" as it is possible to get.
A hrad right wingnut
a.k.a. jackbooted goose-stepping blackshirt thug
you can tell with that blank stare, there's nothing upstairs but a preprogrammed neo-bot.
whacko fundie
canada is looking better all the time.
What the fuk? Hello? O'Connor to this Nazi?? What can be done?
He is so far right that he could shake hands with Adolph.
Looks like a wild-eyed child molester to me
The only upside is that it will be easier to fight a white guy than a woman or a Latino
Jesus, this guy is a Bircher. Say good-bye to privacy, the environment,
reproductive rights, labor unions, and most everything else that made this
country great. Say hello to Nazi Germany.
Ultra-partisan, right-wing, sparse record. I wonder if he's got a porn collection.


You're right Champs...no name calling here from the left....
26 X World Champs said:
Do you see any facts in the above statement? NO! Do you see any attempt at a debate? NO! Do you see any level of intelligence? NO! The remark is pointless and written for only two reasons, to get pats on the back from others who share the Liberal bashing philosophy and to try to anger their opponents. What a great debate this is! Good job!
If we all went by what YOU consider worthless, there'd be only one side to every debate, making this site irrelevant. There is no statement from debatepolitics.com that says, "Every comment MUST be backed by a link & source". Opinions count.

26 X World Champs said:
It seems, based on the quality of the post, that our honorable opponents have popped their wad and have nothing left, they're hanging limply in the wind.
That's your second "male genitalia" remark...am I seeing an obsession here?

26 X World Champs said:
I would prefer to see some level of intelligence displayed and a sincere attempt to debate the issues of the day. Is that beyond the capability of some of you? Is it a stretch to actually believe that our political opponents have the capability to have a debate without general Liberal bashing?
Debate rebuttals are, for the most part, the same level of intelligance of the original post...If someone starts a thread with "Ronald Reagan was just ATRP (another terrible Republican President)", as was done thing morning, a true debate is not only "not necessaray", but "not warranted". Don't hold conservatives to some sort of higher standard when the liberals show many examples of mudslinging themselves...apparently you've missed my earler post under "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder"...hence, I reiterate...

I'm a conservative and I think threads like this are just dumb.

I've never said that liberals hate this country...I just believe that their solutions are more detrimental to what is being done now. That doesn't give anyone a right to spew hatred. This post was meant to inflame instead of sparking an actual debate.

Just because the author of this thread & I appear to be on the same team, that doesn't mean I have to use the same "low-brow" tactics to get my point accross.

I will admit...AND I will still accuse...the Liberals have hijacked the Democratic Party and have forced the "squeaky wheel" to get the oil(Howard Dean; Nancy Pelosi; Barbara Boxer...). That shouldn't mean that conservatives should undermine actual debate in order to get in "cheap shots".

Although I will confess...I take cheap shots and I will continue to do so...but only when I see that debating is not an option....Debating someone who has already accepted the "company line" will get me nowhere, and snide comments is all they deserve. But I would understand if someone, who is a stauch conservative, gets the same treatment. This thread is a perfect example.


Funny...I never see YOU make the same denouncements...I guess if you did, that's an admission that it HAPPENS, which you've said it doesn't in your above second paragraph, which is stated below...

26 X World Champs said:
Ever notice that Democrats do not write statements that are full of crap like the statement I quoted?
{Editor's note from God himself} - Damn cnredd!...You just caught him on that one...good job!...good debate!

26 X World Champs said:
I for one would appreciate the upgrade....
Since "male genitalia" references seems to be your forte, let me say that there are many websites out there that are more than happy to accept your debates as gospel and are willing to bring you into their Bush-bashing circle-jerk.
 
cnredd said:
According to Pew Research, 20% of the country is liberal, not 50% like you claim....You have a lot less friends than you thought you did, eh?
I was referring to DEMOCRATS.
cnredd said:
Here is a previous post of mine relating to Supreme Court Nomination Roberts...

Remember when I asked if I should wait 24 hours and post people's "smear" comments?....Here we are after THREE HOURS...many sources

a partisan right wing tool
He's a mob lawyer, plain and simple
he's the perfect cookie cutter conservative mimicking the party line.
This nomination is as "in your face" as it is possible to get.
A hrad right wingnut


You're right Champs...no name calling here from the left....
Thanks for making my point! I said that Dems do NOT attack Republicans in toto, instead they attack individuals in the public domain. We do not make inane generalizations about the entire Republican party.
cnredd said:
If we all went by what YOU consider worthless, there'd be only one side to every debate, making this site irrelevant. There is no statement from debatepolitics.com that says, "Every comment MUST be backed by a link & source". Opinions count.
Somehow you seem to have misunderstood the obvious point I was making? I was asking for the people in this community who constantly make crass generalizations about all Democrats & Liberals to debate, not to agree with me. It is not debating when someone writes:
Originally Posted by cnredd
Testify, teach!

The Liberal Borg doesn't understand "tough love"...These are the same people that don't keep score at baseball games because it might make somebody feel bad.
cnredd said:
That's your second "male genitalia" remark...am I seeing an obsession here?
Debating again?
cnredd said:
Don't hold conservatives to some sort of higher standard when the liberals show many examples of mudslinging themselves.
I don't. I am not judging people by their party only as do multiple community members here do. I want to debate the issues, and too often I read rebuttals that are general cracks against Liberals or personal attacks against members of this community. I consider these as diversion because the person diverting hasn't a factual rebuttal to defend their previously stated views, so instead they appear to poo poo the challenge and bang back with diversions.
cnredd said:
I've never said that liberals hate this country...I just believe that their solutions are more detrimental to what is being done now.
This is some of what you've written this week about Liberals:
Wipe your mouth IValueFreedom...you have a little Schumer-spoo on your lips...
Sorry, Tet...I'm just prepping you for the upcoming Liberal Borg responses...
The Kool-Aid has been sipped. The liberal Borg has taken you over.
Thus, the NAACPETCPWDTLU lives on proudly...
You just want him out...You really don't care why...having a Republican official go down will be treated as a Liberal victory...you'll be dancing in the streets like Palestinians after 9/11.
Heaven forbid a liberal would win the Presidency....For about three weeks, every Democrat would be celebrating...."We got rid of the Evil Empire!"...
Howard Dean could use some stooges for next year's election...Oh yeah...you're not a liberal.
cnredd said:
Since "male genitalia" references seems to be your forte, let me say that there are many websites out there that are more than happy to accept your debates as gospel and are willing to bring you into their Bush-bashing circle-jerk.
Very nice. Attack me personally, again. Feeling better now?

Debating is a skill. It would be quite pleasant to see more debating and less stupid generalizations about all Democrats / Liberals being this or that. Is it too hard to accomplish? Are you all unable to debate issues rather than attacking half the country in post after post?
 
Your original post...

26 X World Champs said:
Do people who write this anti-liberal crap get an erection doing so? It sure seems to excite them to bash half the country.

My response...

cnredd said:
According to Pew Research, 20% of the country is liberal, not 50% like you claim....You have a lot less friends than you thought you did, eh?

And then you write...

26 X World Champs said:
I was referring to DEMOCRATS.

You would've posted this if you were telling the truth...
Do people who write this anti-DEMOCRATIC crap get an erection doing so? It sure seems to excite them to bash half the country.

Congrats!...You just got cought moving the goalposts!

You are simply "undebatable". I should've learned from teacher and your little "basement" charade...
 
Does anyone whose been reading these posts with any intelligence see that 26 X World Champs CONVIENENTLY skipped this part of my post...

cnredd said:
apparently you've missed my earler post under "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder"...hence, I reiterate...

I'm a conservative and I think threads like this are just dumb.

I've never said that liberals hate this country...I just believe that their solutions are more detrimental to what is being done now. That doesn't give anyone a right to spew hatred. This post was meant to inflame instead of sparking an actual debate.

Just because the author of this thread & I appear to be on the same team, that doesn't mean I have to use the same "low-brow" tactics to get my point accross.

I will admit...AND I will still accuse...the Liberals have hijacked the Democratic Party and have forced the "squeaky wheel" to get the oil(Howard Dean; Nancy Pelosi; Barbara Boxer...). That shouldn't mean that conservatives should undermine actual debate in order to get in "cheap shots".

Although I will confess...I take cheap shots and I will continue to do so...but only when I see that debating is not an option....Debating someone who has already accepted the "company line" will get me nowhere, and snide comments is all they deserve. But I would understand if someone, who is a stauch conservative, gets the same treatment. This thread is a perfect example.


Funny...I never see YOU make the same denouncements...I guess if you did, that's an admission that it HAPPENS, which you've said it doesn't in your above second paragraph, which is stated below...

26 X World Champs said:
Ever notice that Democrats do not write statements that are full of crap like the statement I quoted?

Don't bother answering it now...The fact that you left it out tells everyone all they need to know about you and your debating skills...

Seriously...don't answer it...Just sit there and think, "Hey, he's right...I DID remove parts of his post in my response..."

And this from someone who tells everyone else how to debate...Simply stupid.
 
cnredd said:
And then you write...

You would've posted this if you were telling the truth...
Do people who write this anti-DEMOCRATIC crap get an erection doing so? It sure seems to excite them to bash half the country.

Congrats!...You just got cought moving the goalposts!

You are simply "undebatable".
I asked a simple question....and I did not say anything about Republicans or individuals.

I prefer to debate politics, not semantics.
 
26 X World Champs said:
Thanks for making my point! I said that Dems do NOT attack Republicans in toto, instead they attack individuals in the public domain. We do not make inane generalizations about the entire Republican party.

Posted NOT 10 MINUTES AGO in another thread...

PerryLogan said:
In a few short years, we will be hunting Republicans down in the streets. It will be an awesome time for America.
 
Me:
Pot calling kettle black?
You:
Good one! You've honed your debating skills during your time off last week...
Okay champs, every one else understands what I mean by the pot calling the kettle black, except for you. Here, I'll dumb it down for you.
26 X World Champs said:
Do people who write this anti-liberal crap get an erection doing so? It sure seems to excite them to bash half the country.
Just replace liberal with conservative there. You're doing the same thing you accuse every one else of doing.

Ever notice that Democrats do not write statements that are full of crap like the statement I quoted?

Then what is that?
Read it again? Name calling, stupid analogies that are pointless and untrue.
You are so easy champs, and such a proven liar. That's why I hardly bother with you anymore. Now here you admonish for name calling. Let me copy and paste from this same post.
Do you see any level of intelligence?
That's your quote champs. Hence "Pot calling the kettle black."
Why? I can only think that there must be some weird sexual rush that these people get because why else would they make up stuff that is so untrue?
You are truly mean and nasty aren't you? Now here you talk about lying. Remember the "Monkey Fiasco" champs? I'm sure you do. I keep a copy of it in a special place. Go see champs get caught in his lies and then try to crawl out from it like the snake he is. Forum "The Basement and Flame on" thread "Top Ten Lists and teacher abuse" posts #56 and #57. That's you lying champs. Just like you accuse others of here. Pot calling the kettle black.

Do you see any facts in the above statement? NO! Do you see any attempt at a debate? NO! Do you see any level of intelligence? NO! The remark is pointless and written for only two reasons, to get pats on the back from others who share the Liberal bashing philosophy and to try to anger their opponents. What a great debate this is! Good job!
And what excactly have you done so far in this post champs?
It seems, based on the quality of the post, that our honorable opponents have popped their wad and have nothing left, they're hanging limply in the wind.
Read it again? Name calling, stupid analogies that are pointless and untrue.
That's your comment from this same post champs. So I guess their anologies are stupid, but your repeated anologies of a sexual nature are sheer genius?

I would prefer to see some level of intelligence displayed and a sincere attempt to debate the issues of the day.
Such as you in this post?
Is that beyond the capability of some of you?
We are so lucky to have you be the judge of that for us champs.
Is it a stretch to actually believe that our political opponents have the capability to have a debate without general Liberal bashing?
You are making such a fine example here champs.

I for one would appreciate the upgrade....


And we just saw you lead the way, didn't we. Bet you don't have an intelligent reply to this. You should know better than to call me out champs. I always clean your clock. Funny thing about being honest. You don't have to worry about what you did before. Unlike you champs.
 
teacher said:
And we just saw you lead the way, didn't we. Bet you don't have an intelligent reply to this. You should know better than to call me out champs. I always clean your clock. Funny thing about being honest. You don't have to worry about what you did before. Unlike you champs.

A broken clock is right twice a day...

Which is three more times than 26 X World Champs.
 
Back
Top Bottom