- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 6,971
- Reaction score
- 1,564
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Hottest September on record, after many other record hot month this year.
Following the hottest summer on record, 2019 continues to head for the history books. Last month was officially the hottest September on record, just slightly hotter (.04 degrees Fahrenheit) than the previous record-holder, September 2016.
Last month was 1.02 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than the average September from 1981-2010 and about 1.2 degrees Fahrenheit above the preindustrial level, according to data released Friday by the Copernicus Climate Change Service, an organization that tracks global temperatures.
According to AFP, the organization is treating the two months as joint record-holders because the difference is negligible.
September follows a record-setting summer, which recorded the hottest June and July, and the second hottest August. This July was the hottest month on record since record-keeping began 140 years ago.
Climate Change: Earth just experienced its hottest September ever recorded - CBS News
There also 2014-2019 are set to become the warmest recorded five year period.
Five-year period ending 2019 set to be hottest on record
Hottest September on record, after many other record hot month this year.
Following the hottest summer on record, 2019 continues to head for the history books. Last month was officially the hottest September on record, just slightly hotter (.04 degrees Fahrenheit) than the previous record-holder, September 2016.
Last month was 1.02 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than the average September from 1981-2010 and about 1.2 degrees Fahrenheit above the preindustrial level, according to data released Friday by the Copernicus Climate Change Service, an organization that tracks global temperatures.
According to AFP, the organization is treating the two months as joint record-holders because the difference is negligible.
September follows a record-setting summer, which recorded the hottest June and July, and the second hottest August. This July was the hottest month on record since record-keeping began 140 years ago.
Climate Change: Earth just experienced its hottest September ever recorded - CBS News
There also 2014-2019 are set to become the warmest recorded five year period.
Five-year period ending 2019 set to be hottest on record
Hottest September on record, after many other record hot month this year.
Following the hottest summer on record, 2019 continues to head for the history books. Last month was officially the hottest September on record, just slightly hotter (.04 degrees Fahrenheit) than the previous record-holder, September 2016.
Last month was 1.02 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than the average September from 1981-2010 and about 1.2 degrees Fahrenheit above the preindustrial level, according to data released Friday by the Copernicus Climate Change Service, an organization that tracks global temperatures.
According to AFP, the organization is treating the two months as joint record-holders because the difference is negligible.
September follows a record-setting summer, which recorded the hottest June and July, and the second hottest August. This July was the hottest month on record since record-keeping began 140 years ago.
Climate Change: Earth just experienced its hottest September ever recorded - CBS News
There also 2014-2019 are set to become the warmest recorded five year period.
Five-year period ending 2019 set to be hottest on record
The important part of this article is that this is only relevant to the data set of the last 140 years. If one examines prior to this time period one can see that this is far from the hottest temperature ever recorded, it is simply the hottest temperature recorded after the mini ice ace which is to be expected. Given we are leaving an unusually cold period of time temperature would be expected to rebound. I have provided a link to the IPCC report that discusses how the current temperatures are still below those seen during the last 2000 years. In particular the figure on page 202 of the report shows how prior to the dip caused by the mini ice age the global temperature was higher then it is currently.
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ipcc_far_wg_I_full_report.pdf
The important part of this article is that this is only relevant to the data set of the last 140 years. If one examines prior to this time period one can see that this is far from the hottest temperature ever recorded, it is simply the hottest temperature recorded after the mini ice ace which is to be expected. Given we are leaving an unusually cold period of time temperature would be expected to rebound. I have provided a link to the IPCC report that discusses how the current temperatures are still below those seen during the last 2000 years. In particular the figure on page 202 of the report shows how prior to the dip caused by the mini ice age the global temperature was higher then it is currently.
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ipcc_far_wg_I_full_report.pdf
Looks like 2019 is going to shape up to be the 2nd hottest ever on record. When will the deniers start admitting to reality?
The important part of this article is that this is only relevant to the data set of the last 140 years. If one examines prior to this time period one can see that this is far from the hottest temperature ever recorded, it is simply the hottest temperature recorded after the mini ice ace which is to be expected. Given we are leaving an unusually cold period of time temperature would be expected to rebound. I have provided a link to the IPCC report that discusses how the current temperatures are still below those seen during the last 2000 years. In particular the figure on page 202 of the report shows how prior to the dip caused by the mini ice age the global temperature was higher then it is currently.
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ipcc_far_wg_I_full_report.pdf
Historical evidence does not add to doubts about AGW, but it supports the AGW theory. From the National Academy of Science --->
http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/exec-office-other/climate-change-QA.pdf
Measurements of air in ice cores show that for the past 800,000 years up until the 20th century, the
atmospheric CO2 concentration stayed within the range 170 to 300 parts per million (ppm), making the recent
rapid rise to nearly 400 ppm over 200 years particularly remarkable [figure 3].
...
Adding more CO2 to the atmosphere will cause surface temperatures to continue to increase. As the atmospheric concentrations of CO2
increase, the addition of extra CO2 becomes progressively less effective at trapping Earth’s energy, but surface temperature
will still rise.
I'm not a denier, but if humans had never existed on Earth, what would the temperature of the Earth have been this year, exactly?
That is the first IPCC report, which was published nearly 30 years ago! There have been another four since then. Not only has the science moved on, but the Earth has also warmed significantly in the meantime. More recent research has indicated that the current temperature is indeed almost certainly higher than at any time during the last 2000 years.
From the 5th IPCC (WG1) report, published in 2013:
It's impossible to say that the temperature for single year would have been without manmade global warming. While that it's clear is that you are seeing warmer and warmer global temperature because of manmade global warming.
"Average global temperature between 2015-2019 is on track to be the hottest of any five-year period on record, according to the report compiled by the World Meteorological Organization.
The period "is currently estimated to be 1.1 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial (1850-1900) times and 0.2 degrees Celsius warmer than 2011-2015," it said.
The past four years were already the hottest since record-keeping began in 1850."
Five-year period ending 2019 set to be hottest on record
There we are now running out of time in avoiding many of the devastating effects of climate change.
"The impacts and costs of 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit (1.5 degrees Celsius) of global warming will be far greater than expected, according to a comprehensive assessment by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released Sunday in Incheon, South Korea.
The past decade has seen an astonishing run of record-breaking storms, forest fires, droughts, coral bleaching, heat waves, and floods around the world with just 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit (1.0 degrees Celsius) of global warming. [See: Hidden Costs of Climate Change Running Hundreds of Billions a Year] But much of this will get substantially worse with 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit of warming, and far worse at 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius), according to the IPCC’s “Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C”, released Sunday and examining more than 6,000 studies."
Climate change impacts worse than expected, IPCC 1.5 report warns
Yes, it's impossible to say what temperatures would have been like.
Yes, temperatures are rising. But is this natural? If we look at data from the 100,000 year cycle, we see temperatures rising to HIGHER than the currently are, then a combination of things then leads to a massive drop in temperatures. Is this what is happening?
Can we stop the devastating effects of climate change? These effects happen on a regular basis, every 100,000 years or so. Perhaps this is the Earth's way of dealing with problems.
Yaay, the usual denier bull****!The important part of this article is that this is only relevant to the data set of the last 140 years....
:roll:If one examines prior to this time period one can see that this is far from the hottest temperature ever recorded, it is simply the hottest temperature recorded after the mini ice ace which is to be expected.
** bzzt ** wrongGiven we are leaving an unusually cold period of time temperature would be expected to rebound.
LOLI have provided a link to the IPCC report that discusses how the current temperatures are still below those seen during the last 2000 years....
We have more than enough data to know what global temperatures were since 1880.It is also important to note that while we began recording temperatures 140 years ago, it was not as prevalent as it is today....
No, they really don't.Naturally, they also ignore the temperature records we know were higher more than 140 years ago.
No, you really don't. There are no temperature records at all above 52°N latitude prior to 1915. Even after 1915, there are entire months of missing data between 1915 and 1930. NASA extrapolated the data to cover the missing data, which is not the same as making a direct observation.We have more than enough data to know what global temperatures were since 1880.
Yes, they really do. Between 950 AD and 1250 AD mean surface temperatures were 2°C warmer than today. Between 200 BC and 400 AD mean surface temperatures were 3°C warmer than today. Also between 3500 BC and 3200 BC mean surface temperatures were 4°C warmer than today. Lastly, around 7000 BC or 9,000 years ago (a.k.a. Holocene Thermal Maximum) was ~6°C warmer than today and the hottest it has been in the last 115,000 years (since the end of the Eocene Interglacial Period).No, they really don't.
Climate scientists are well aware of temperatures before the instrumental record period.
The temperature is rising, but it is pure hubris to believe it has anything to do with human activity. The IPCC is a government entity whose sole purpose is to push a Marxist redistribution of wealth agenda and blame all climate on humanity.Plus, your attempted obfuscation fails, because it's still a fact that temperatures are rising because of anthropic activity. The scientific evidence is solid. Mealy-mouthed complaints about records or the IPCC do not change that basic fact.
Yes, we do. We can use proxy data to fill in the gaps as needed. And even if we're looking at the past 60 years of data, we can easily see that temperatures are not only rising faster than any recent period, they're rising 10 times faster than when natural events cause warming.No, you really don't....
:roll:Yes, they really do. Between 950 AD and 1250 AD mean surface temperatures were 2°C warmer than today. Between 200 BC and 400 AD mean surface temperatures were 3°C warmer than today....
:roll:The temperature is rising, but it is pure hubris to believe it has anything to do with human activity.
Hottest September on record, after many other record hot month this year.
Following the hottest summer on record, 2019 continues to head for the history books. Last month was officially the hottest September on record, just slightly hotter (.04 degrees Fahrenheit) than the previous record-holder, September 2016.
Last month was 1.02 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than the average September from 1981-2010 and about 1.2 degrees Fahrenheit above the preindustrial level, according to data released Friday by the Copernicus Climate Change Service, an organization that tracks global temperatures.
According to AFP, the organization is treating the two months as joint record-holders because the difference is negligible.
September follows a record-setting summer, which recorded the hottest June and July, and the second hottest August. This July was the hottest month on record since record-keeping began 140 years ago.
Climate Change: Earth just experienced its hottest September ever recorded - CBS News
There also 2014-2019 are set to become the warmest recorded five year period.
Five-year period ending 2019 set to be hottest on record
From your link:
About us
The Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) supports society by providing authoritative information about the past, present and future climate in Europe and the rest of the World.
Our mission
The C3S mission is to support adaptation and mitigation policies of the European Union by providing consistent and authoritative information about climate change. We offer free and open access to climate data and tools based on the best available science. We listen to our users and endeavour to help them meet their goals in dealing with the impacts of climate change.
Another agenda driven site.
That is the problem. When you don't have the data you just make it up to suit your leftist agenda. I've got news for you, that isn't science. What you call "proxy data" the rest of the planet calls "propaganda."Yes, we do. We can use proxy data to fill in the gaps as needed. And even if we're looking at the past 60 years of data, we can easily see that temperatures are not only rising faster than any recent period, they're rising 10 times faster than when natural events cause warming.
You obviously failed to follow the link I provided. If you had you would have seen a peer-reviewed paper on the Holocene Thermal Maximum, which does not rely on bogus "proxy data." They provide the source of their data and none of it is manufactured out of thin air to push an agenda. In other words, it is REAL science. Not the leftist propaganda you push.Do you really not understand that it is climate scientists who gathered that proxy data?
You just demonstrated that your climate fanaticism is a religion, and not based on science at all. Science is always debated. The only time it "is no longer open to debate" is when it becomes your religion.Spare us the bull****. Your denials have as little scientific merit as "the Earth is flat" and "cigarettes are not a carcinogen." AGW is no longer open to debate.
That is the problem. When you don't have the data you just make it up to suit your leftist agenda. I've got news for you, that isn't science. What you call "proxy data" the rest of the planet calls "propaganda."
You obviously failed to follow the link I provided. If you had you would have seen a peer-reviewed paper on the Holocene Thermal Maximum, which does not rely on bogus "proxy data." They provide the source of their data and none of it is manufactured out of thin air to push an agenda. In other words, it is REAL science. Not the leftist propaganda you push.
You just demonstrated that your climate fanaticism is a religion, and not based on science at all. Science is always debated. The only time it "is no longer open to debate" is when it becomes your religion.
From your link:
About us
The Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) supports society by providing authoritative information about the past, present and future climate in Europe and the rest of the World.
Our mission
The C3S mission is to support adaptation and mitigation policies of the European Union by providing consistent and authoritative information about climate change. We offer free and open access to climate data and tools based on the best available science. We listen to our users and endeavour to help them meet their goals in dealing with the impacts of climate change.
Another agenda driven site.
The agenda being what? Propagation of scientific information? The horror!
So if I say that the earth is round that should be debated endlessly or otherwise it’s a religion?
:roll:That is the problem. When you don't have the data you just make it up to suit your leftist agenda....
Yes, I'm a little tired of expending my energy pointing out the myriad ways deniers cherry-pick data and ignore the overwhelming scientific evidence that human activity is causing the planet to warm, only to see it be widely ignored. So, hard pass.You obviously failed to follow the link I provided....
LOLIf you had you would have seen a peer-reviewed paper on the Holocene Thermal Maximum, which does not rely on bogus "proxy data." They provide the source of their data and none of it is manufactured out of thin air to push an agenda.
No, I'm just indicating that the time for treating denier nonsense as thought it has any merit is over.You just demonstrated that your climate fanaticism is a religion....
LOLScience is always debated.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?