• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say

What an f'ing weirdo.

GuUqWxhacAAGSx_
 
Callen said:
I actually suspect in this case the DIA assessment is likely better than his non sourced out of the blue version. CNN reported the DIA assessment. They had none of their own. To be honest I only want the truth......and I've learned that usually is not Trump.
Click to expand...
Nice dance.
 
Fletch said:
Actually I dont.

Like I said, its all hate with you guys. If Trump takes a position, you take the opposite position. No further thought on your part is needed or available.
Click to expand...
Except he usually takes a position I was already opposed to.

How do you square that with your attempted burn?
 
Anthony60 said:
I really hope that he is right and that his information is better than CNN's, don't you?
Click to expand...
Well, a bunch of folks hoped he would use their charitable contributions to do what they were told he would instead of spending it on himself.

So I would not bet the farm on it.

Well, on second thought he did bankrupt two casinos…
 
Emlee said:
Yeah, he literally admits that intelligence didn’t say “completely and totally obliterated”.

But anyone who reported the same, or anyone who pointed to the same incurs his rabid wrath and the rabid wrath of his cult.
Click to expand...
“Thank their guts out”?
 
Allan said:
I guess the program infrastructure is very well protected.

Starting from the position that Iran can never possess a nuclear weapon, and taking into consideration that America's biggest bombs can't completely destroy their ability to produce one, what is the next step?



Click to expand...
Without reading through the replies in this thread, and being as how this is the first time that I've logged in to this place since the attack... I'm guessing that right now you feel pretty stupid for falling for this bullshit?
 
Jack Fabulous said:
Without reading through the replies in this thread, and being as how this is the first time that I've logged in to this place since the attack... I'm guessing that right now you feel pretty stupid for falling for this bullshit?
Click to expand...
The Military Intelligence Agency knows more about this than you do.
 
Jack Fabulous said:
Without reading through the replies in this thread, and being as how this is the first time that I've logged in to this place since the attack... I'm guessing that right now you feel pretty stupid for falling for this bullshit?
Click to expand...

I'm guessing you should read more.
 
Jack Fabulous said:
The story was bullshit reported by a "reporter" with a long history of reporting bullshit.

What's that old saying? "Fool me once..."

When you gonna learn?
Click to expand...
Trump and Leavitt have both confirmed the report from MIA.
 
Jack Fabulous said:
Without reading through the replies in this thread, and being as how this is the first time that I've logged in to this place since the attack... I'm guessing that right now you feel pretty stupid for falling for this bullshit?
Click to expand...
I have just spent the last hour or so reviewing this thread. Whew, it is sure worth a read now. Talk about a thread having serious aging issues!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom