- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 106,197
- Reaction score
- 87,662
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
Well they might turn back to their tried and true "Fake News" cries.
Well they might turn back to their tried and true "Fake News" cries.Yeah, that's awkward on Donald's part. Declaring a Donald-brokered ceasefire before he even knew whether his strikes were successful. If they weren't, now Iran can return to the status quo while Donald has to figure out how to worm his way out of his own ceasefire "deal" and if he doesn't, Israel will attack anyway and make Donald look like a cuck on the world state.
Poor baby.
Yes, that's him but it is irresponsible and that's him too.
Wouldn't that just be the most deliciously ironic situation for Iran to find itself in: your nuclear enrichment facilities aren't destroyed, but Donald is scared of losing face so you say to the world, "oh woe is us, our nuclear facilities were completely and Strongly obliterated by Donald's powerful bomb, oh shucks I guess no nukes for us" then you quietly get back to processing ore.Well they might turn back to their tried and true "Fake News" cries.
It certainly my would surprise the shit out of me!I'm a Trump supporter......you didn't see me yesterday, did you? Does it make you angry that Trump possibly could have done something right and correct? Is it an impossible thing to ever accept?
Would you trust Trump? Or, the Pentagon's intelligence arm?
"intelligence assessment"I guess the program infrastructure is very well protected.
Starting from the position that Iran can never possess a nuclear weapon, and taking into consideration that America's biggest bombs can't completely destroy their ability to produce one, what is the next step?
"Low level loser" aptly describes Leavitt.
It certainly my would surprise the shit out of me!
And make me immediately suspicious that he was just doing what an actual competent individual told him to do.
Yeah. Your president is a dunce.Therein lies the problem.
As usual trump speaks bullshit. He had no way of knowing the results, but stupidly proclaimed success.Trump said immediately after the bombing that their weapons program was "obliterated".
Maybe that was reckless as satellite photos we're even available yet.
The NYT confirms the report. They also mention that before the strikes, the military estimated it would take several days of bombing to eliminate the sites, not just one strike. AndI'm going with this....... you do you.
We NH-1 voters inflicted her on the rest of you by obliterating her Congressional ambitions. With nothing to do, she started spoxing Trump for free. He liked it so much she's everyone's problem now.Post #50
Leavitt comes off as a petulant child.
An ignorant, petulant child.
As he always does.Or…Trump prematurely claimed “obliterated” when he could have easily said the missions went off exactly as planned, commended our military and said that the extent of the damage done would be forthcoming as intelligence evaluated after the fact.
But nope…he went with “completely obliterated” and backed himself into this f*cking corner like a moron.
Three people at the Defence Intelligence Agency."intelligence assessment"
In other words...fake news.
Oh...wait...unnamed sources again. Yep. Fake news.
So what?Three people at the Defence Intelligence Agency.
Their names are known by the journalists.
"Low level loser" aptly describes Leavitt.
Worse.Trump said it was "obliterated". Rush to judgement?
THIS ^^^^So what?
They are still unnamed sources. Fake news.
Journalists protect source's privacy. Nothing new.So what?
They are still unnamed sources. Fake news.
Except now it's been confirmed by AP, WaPo, NYT...I'm going with this....... you do you.
Yes, but the way he overcompensates is by whining furiously on Truth Social about how unfair his whole life is.I know @Allan thinks I'm wrong to favor odds Trump will nuke, but with all this public winning we know he is going to overcompensate.
Who in the room can or will talk him out of it?
It is perfectly acceptable and should be taken as gospel when KING-DICTATOR-MAGAT-PRESIDENT Trump and Trump Administration company quote "unnamed sources" or even make up "unnamed sources", but it is totally not alright when anyone LEFT of the Centerline does it.Journalists protect source's privacy. Nothing new.
I want you guys to be right. [Looks around at actual timeline.] But...Yes, but the way he overcompensates is by whining furiously on Truth Social about how unfair his whole life is.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?