- Joined
- Nov 9, 2020
- Messages
- 50,511
- Reaction score
- 68,118
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
The reporting was nowhere near that. Quite the opposite. They stressed and stressed it was early and preliminary
The reporting was nowhere near that. Quite the opposite. They stressed and stressed it was early and preliminaryAccording to 4 unnamed people, a leaker with an anti-Trump agenda, and (again anti-Trump) CNN's gem, Kaitlan Collins. And the left is right here - thinking their hopes and dreams of U.S. failure and wishes for the survival and preservation of Iran's nuclear capabilities are being met.
Including the President.Jeesh, is everyone so fast to judge the other side?......use your common sense and brain. Of course it will take time to know for sure, hell the damn places were buried way into the ground surrounded by hundreds of feet of concrete.....even a satellite can't see it. Give it time, don't rush to judgment and rumors/gossip/anonymous sources.
Including the President.
Maybe Trump should reveal the source of his Intel that caused him to order the attacksShow us that source then. Let's see what the "Defense Intelligence Agency" had to report, Allan.
Yes, that's him but it is irresponsible and that's him too.Well, lol.....I have oftentimes said Trump doesn't know when to keep his mouth shut, but that's him.
It wasn't too early to know yesterday when you confidently declared that the destruction was so total that we don't even need to worry about the nuclear program any longer, simply because Donald issued you those talking points along with instructions to repeat them. And of course like a loyal little soldier, you followed your orders.It's really too early to know, and the nuclear facilities were destroyed, the question is how significant is the hit to the nuclear program, so I'm not sure what's this gotcha moment you're imagining here but it's non-existent.
Damage assessment is part of the DIA's job and while early assessments can change it's probably pretty damned close to authoritative. It also accords with what DIA told policy makers was a possible outcome.A lot of 'early assessments' are going to be provided to officials in the coming days. Wonder how many of those will be published on CNN.
Well, if the number one state sponsor of terrorism worldwide and a government of religious genocidal maniacs tells us they don't want a nuclear bomb, we should certainly believe them. If you can't trust the Iranian government, who can you trust?Iran promises they will never build a bomb, and don't want one.
But we already know that Israel has nukes?Well, if the number one state sponsor of terrorism worldwide and a government of religious genocidal maniacs tells us they don't want a nuclear bomb, we should certainly believe them.
Show us that source then. Let's see what the "Defense Intelligence Agency" had to report, Allan.
Where did you earn your degrees in geology and physics?It isn’t. It’s a simple matter geology and physics.
“O what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.”
(This thread)
CNN runs with an early intel report with anonymous sources that has been strongly disputed, and the rest of you get busy spreading what is little more than the usual unsubstantiated rumor as the God's truth.
Good luck with that.
*The Fascist Party has joined the chat*
Yes, that's him but it is irresponsible and that's him too.
You know what I would have done inIf the sites arent rubble they are too unstable to use again.. all that vibration either took out the centrifuges (broke them apart), or made
the separation less reliable.
How is iran going to clear all the top rubble and reuse the sites anyhow? But go ahead. They dont have the money and if they do so we'll rock them again
Who aside from that world renowned rocket scientist Karoline Leavitt is disputing it?“O what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.”
(This thread)
CNN runs with an early intel report with anonymous sources that has been strongly disputed, and the rest of you get busy spreading what is little more than the usual unsubstantiated rumor as the God's truth.
Good luck with that.
Including the President.
I guess the program infrastructure is very well protected.
Starting from the position that Iran can never possess a nuclear weapon, and taking into consideration that America's biggest bombs can't completely destroy their ability to produce one, what is the next step?
Uh oh, is Donny gonna get mad? Or maybe just fall asleep.Doh!
Yeah, that's awkward on Donald's part. Declaring a Donald-brokered ceasefire before he even knew whether his strikes were successful. If they weren't, now Iran can return to the status quo while Donald has to figure out how to worm his way out of his own ceasefire "deal" and if he doesn't, Israel will attack anyway and make Donald look like a cuck on the world state.Uh oh, is Donny gonna get mad? Or maybe just fall asleep.
Maybe Iran can push a ceasefire for a few months.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?