• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Early indications are that Tyler Robinson is some form of right-winger

Getting clearer.

 
The weird thing is that people feel compelled to base their political opinions on whether one lunatic said a few words in favor of one party or the other. Tyler Robinson, if he is a murdering censor, is one person NOBODY should listen to about politics, neither to support them, nor to oppose them.

The Republicans raced to try to blame a whole political party for the act of one criminal, and now the best the Democrats can think to do is to belatedly do the same?
 
So when he called executing gays “God’s perfect law” that wasn’t spreading hate?
Christians do some weird contortions around that. It's very obviously inconsistent with what Jesus taught... but a lot of people don't want to deal with how the Old Testament and New Testament had fundamentally different goals and values. The Kirk defenders say that "God's perfect law" isn't doable, but don't explain how it is so vicious in tone.

Abraham made a covenant to make his seed as numerous as the dust of the earth. That's a different goal from wanting to do what is right. Christianity doesn't preach genetic or cultural survival, but survival of the person's plotline, a new breath of life. I think it is directly analogous to the Kemetist concept of creating the akh from the ba and the new ka, as opposed to propagating the lesser "souls" (such as genetic lineage) recognized by that religion.
 
You're being extremely charitable. Good on you. I've already made up my mind. This dude, like all the other shooters, is a Rightwinger. He completely fits the profile of a Rightwinger. Religious, gun nut, young, white male. He checks all the boxes.
Well as they say you can’t use reason to argue someone out of a position they didn’t use reason to get into.
And that describes you too a T.

You don’t have any idea what you are talking about. As usual.
 
That was a lie said by a trump person in the government, I forget who, repeated by a trump FBI official. I think the video goes over it. Because why not make up lies about trans people with no consequences?
Are those Trump lies kind of like the lies you were peddling on your OP.
Yeah sure seems like it.
 
The weird thing is that people feel compelled to base their political opinions on whether one lunatic said a few words in favor of one party or the other. Tyler Robinson, if he is a murdering censor, is one person NOBODY should listen to about politics, neither to support them, nor to oppose them.

Republicans want to exploit the incident to attack their opponents.

The Republicans raced to try to blame a whole political party for the act of one criminal, and now the best the Democrats can think to do is to belatedly do the same?

Uh, no.
 
Republicans want to exploit the incident to attack their opponents.



Uh, no.
Seeing as you have already been caught posting bs information it seems rather clear that you want to exploit it as well.
 
Turns out the thread is a bust.
We seem to be at the stage of the conversation where many maga folks are just plugging their ears and are proceeding with their preferred reality. This often happens when a shooter turns out to have conservative coding in their history. I saw the same phenomenon with Crooks.
 
Yeah if someone says Charlie Kirk was spreading hate they are liars cuz no he wasn't.

Hate is a subjective thing. If you're on the same side of the fence pissing out, you don't want to turn and face the guy also pissing out in case you get pissed on.
 
Funny, because he's actually on the right... so I guess you'll have to change your opinion on how lefties look.

A rightie betrayed by a loud rightie who condemned his ilk.

Still doesn't excuse murder. Or any harm. But it seems like it's a "thing" with righties to have been loyal followers, then felt their heros let them down.
 
We seem to be at the stage of the conversation where many maga folks are just plugging their ears and are proceeding with their preferred reality. This often happens when a shooter turns out to have conservative coding in their history. I saw the same phenomenon with Crooks.

You believed this image was real.

1757846260480.webp
 
I'll wait for better sourcing and confirmation. This would be a plot twist if accurate.

I think we're going to find that he's a confused young man who doesn't fit neatly into any particular box. I know others will disagree but I'm not sure Kirk's murder is necessarily as political as it seems on the surface. We're probably going to find that this kid had some issues, that there were major warning signs that people observed but refused to believe and address, and that Kirk was just an object to channel and focus his negative energies on.

Like the assassination of JFK, it's considered a politically-motivated crime because the victim was politically active, but the perpetrator was mentally disturbed and socially isolated and saw a chance to make a name for himself.
 
I think we're going to find that he's a confused young man who doesn't fit neatly into any particular box.

I suspect it's going to be closely tied to the far-right internet groups he was in, including one that grooms people for violence.
 
This is the title of the video.

Charlie Kirk's Shooter's RADICAL BELIEFS Just Got EXPOSED.
Go through the video minute by minute and write out a summary.
 
Back
Top Bottom