• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Durable Goods Orders

donsutherland1

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Messages
11,862
Reaction score
10,300
Location
New York
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
Today, Bloomberg.com reported:

Orders for U.S. durable goods, excluding automobiles and aircraft, unexpectedly gained in June, signaling that manufacturing may expand in the second half of the year.

Excluding transportation equipment, orders for goods meant to last several years climbed 1.1 percent, the most in four months, the Commerce Department said today in Washington...

The durable-goods figures used to calculate economic growth indicate that companies plan to boost investment in coming months, adding to evidence the worst recession in five decades was starting to ease.


At the same time, CNBC reported:

New orders for long-lasting U.S. manufactured goods fell more sharply than expected in June, notching their biggest decline in five months as demand for communications and transportation equipment slumped, a government report showed on Wednesday...

"Durable goods doesn't look positive ... it's no turning point in terms of momentum, and markets have reacted neither positively or negatively," said Sebastien Galy, senior currency strategist at BNP Paribas in New York.


The contrasting emphasis in the two reports highlights the need to look beyond headlines and news summaries. When it comes to the durable goods data, the latest report really reflects what is more often than not par for the course toward the end of a recession. In such cases, a rise in durable goods orders usually starts in sectors, it is not pervasive throughout manufacturing. In addition, during shallow recoveries, as could unfold in the months ahead, different manufacturing sectors can experience different outcomes for an extended period. In short, a growing economy, especially if the growth is weak and secular changes may be underway, may not necessarily lift all boats immediately so to speak.
 
Hmm....Bloomberg missed the mark? What's up with that?

I agree with you, the decrease in durable goods is not usually what happens at the end of a recession....normally something that foreshadows one, right?
 

And don't forget that durable goods data (the M3-1 report ) is revised in the subsequent Factory Orders report (the M3-2 report), often quite substantially. Both series are quite volatile.

The preferred series for analysis purposes is real non-defense capital goods excluding aircraft (to avoid the volatility of the very large big tickets for aircraft). Both reports contain "real non-defense capital goods" which is a leading indicator, which makes it necessary to aware of revisions between M3-1 and M3-2.
 

Absolutely. I believe if one puts together what some of the manufacturing data e.g., real non-defense capital goods ex aircraft, and other pieces concerning manufacturing e.g., the Fed's Beige Book findings, there are strong indications that the manufacturing industry has been stabilizing in recent weeks.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…