Praying in public for all the world to see is just tacky showmanship, something Christ spoke out against, btw.
Matthew 6:5 - Prayer -
You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden;
15 nor does anyone light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on the lampstand, and it gives light to all who are in the house.
16 "Let your light shine before men in such a way that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father who is in heaven.
He didn't spew hate speech.So let me get this straight. Its ok for Duck man to spew hate speech but if anyone fires back at him with the same hate speech they are wrong?
What dimension are you in? Seriously the blame lies at the feet of him and nobody else, stop deflecting.
Unclean hands - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
When you hurt and attack people you lose your right to defense. If you punch somebody in the face they have the right to punch you back.
I don't care about who people screw or their position on gayness - it's such a non-issue to me and that pisses progresses off - they get so bent when people don't take their position and don't promote their ideas or be a "gay promoting warrior" in this case.
The best part is that they're now attempting to claim a business (such as A&E) has the right to drop the guy because of what he says - I agree on that completely but I also think it's wrong and misguided to do so.. Yet these are the same people that claim that a baker DOESN'T have the right to refuse a cake to a gay couple.
Then of course they try to pretend they're reasonable..
Of course they're probably baffled as to why I called them "gay warriors."
No one was attacked by one fellow loosely quoting a biblical scripture in a magazine article. However, since he gave the interview he has been attacked. Calling someone names is not defense.
And of course you spent most of your post, again, attacking this fellow. Spewing hate and calling names when he did nothing more than express his biblically based personal feelings (that you disagree with) in a magazine article.
So let me get this straight. Its ok for Duck man to spew hate speech but if anyone fires back at him with the same hate speech they are wrong?
What dimension are you in? Seriously the blame lies at the feet of him and nobody else, stop deflecting.
Unclean hands - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
When you hurt and attack people you lose your right to defense. If you punch somebody in the face they have the right to punch you back.
Well then you better rally to have the Bible withdrawn from all public libraries and iinstitution. Hell, just ban it. Because that was the source of his quote.
Your primary mistake is in thinking that people take you seriously. Everything else follows
This issue is about homosexuality to you and to me it's about free speech...
Your primary mistake is that you think people empathize with your feelings...
You see - you're spewing your feelings and I'm spewing facts.
This issue is about homosexuality to you and to me it's about free speech...
Your arrogance makes me laugh to boot...
I am saying that if you have an issue with intolerance, being intolerant is not any type of a solution. Hate does not fix hate. Ignorance doesnt fix ignorance. If you are being an intolerant ass to someone, regardless of who started it, doesnt change that you are an intolerant ass.
I'm not going to argue this anymore as its getting boring. This same tactic has been going on throughout this thread, and that is to turn it around and play the victim card. Notice how nobody is talking about how the LGBT community feels about this? Nobody gives a **** about the horrible things Duck man said. You're all concerned about his rights, about how he is being treated, he is the victim now. :roll: He is the victim of hate speech.
This is the difference between conservatives and liberals. When we do wrong we will admit it and admonish people for their slights. However when the shoe is on the other foot you guys defend the wrong to the death. This is holding us back as a country because you guys won't be honest when you should.
I can see you haven't actually bothered to understand what I wrote...
I will give you a hint, it's not about homosexuality. In fact I defended the robertsons on a number of posts.
It's only about legality and societal ethics.
As far my feelings. I have communicated them to exactly one poster. Caine, who was interested enough to state disagreement.
You amuse me though
I'm not going to argue this anymore as its getting boring. This same tactic has been going on throughout this thread, and that is to turn it around and play the victim card. Notice how nobody is talking about how the LGBT community feels about this? Nobody gives a **** about the horrible things Duck man said. You're all concerned about his rights, about how he is being treated, he is the victim now. :roll: He is the victim of hate speech.
This is the difference between conservatives and liberals. When we do wrong we will admit it and admonish people for their slights. However when the shoe is on the other foot you guys defend the wrong to the death. This is holding us back as a country because you guys won't be honest when you should.
There is no legality here - other than the simple fact progressives are obsessed with shoving their crazy logic and social issues down others throats through the judicial system.
I'm not making this a legal issue, I'm just employing your own tactics against you using the same logic...
It kinda sucks when the table shifts doesn't it?
You're blind to all of that and continue to attempt to legitimize your position - and that position is that regulating speech is ok or acceptable just as long as you and other progressives concur......
Apparently A&E agree with you. By suspending him, they initiated a debate.
Flip it, I will make a legal argument - this is discrimination.
The whole Robertsons family should man up and tell A&E to go pound sand.
Which statute or regulation was violated?
Nor is your lack of knowledge about business law and history.
Yeah, that worked well for Charlie Sheen.
Meanwhile if some half naked woman were making out on TV at 7AM over a bowl of cereal when your kids were expecting cartoons these progressives wouldn't be ashamed at all - they would call that progress..
I just think it's amazing how some **** is tolerated and other stuff isn't, and progressives control that...
I just think pointing fingers is wrong when progressives don't even see the faults in their own logic - and their logic is mainstream - it's called political correctness.
I'm more boggled now that they cant accept what I'm telling them.
IT didn't work well for CBS, that show died after Charlie left
And yet in Matthew 5:15
Laws are only as good as the judges that interpret them. The Colorado Bakery decision would have never happened here
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?