You are trying real hard to change the facts, but are still wrong.Doesn't matter what he was asked, he answered. He made a comparison. Pre: happier. Post: not as happy. A comparison. You can't change the facts.
He never said anything about Dixie.Right, according to him Blacks were whistling ****ing Dixie in the fields. :roll:
He never said anything about Dixie.
Nor did he refer to all blacks.
Which is just a further demonstration of your deluded biased thoughts.
You are trying real hard to change the facts, but are still wrong.
He made no such comparison.
That is all a manifestation of your own delusional thoughts.
There is no comparison there. Just an answer to a question asked.
You must be a paid shill.Let's see. Singing. Check. Cotton fields. Check. Blacks. Check. Where? In Dixieland.
I guess only those denying reality like you are here, repeatedly, don't get the analogy.
You are trying real hard to change the facts, but are still wrong.
He made no such comparison.
That is all a manifestation of your own delusional thoughts.
There is no comparison there. Just an answer to a question asked.
Funny.You are bending over backwards to avoid seeing that which is in front of your nose.
:dohI'm sorry, but pre means before. This can only be a comparison. You are factually incorrect.
:doh
Yes, I agree. You are sorry. I suppose it is also common knowledge. But your being sorry is irrelevant, so there is no need to bring it up.
Again with the absurdities.
Figures.
Well you are wrong again.
Pre was the time period he was asked about. He made no comparison.
Right...because I wrote whistling instead of singing. :roll:You must be a paid shill.
First you say "whistling ****ing Dixie " which he never said. When checked and shown you are wrong, you try to flip the script by then mentioning location which had nothing to do with what you said.
The whole position that you have taken, and dishonestly argued, is simply wrong.
No he did not.Yes. He was asked about the time period (an irrelevant fact). And he said than. Compared to now, they were happier. Pre (before) welfare. Comparison.
Why are you so hellbent on defending a rich homophobe who comes across as being, if not racist, at least extremely racially ignorant?Funny.
Your deluded and biased thoughts are not present in reality, and therefore can not be seen.
:dohRight...because I wrote whistling instead of singing. :roll:
Your position is so desperate that you're grabbing at every straw you can find. Aren't ya?
More irrelevant deflection.Why are you so hellbent on defending a rich homophobe who comes across as being, if not racist, at least extremely racially ignorant?
No he did not.
He repeated the question back to the person who asked, and then answered it with his personal experience of that specific time (which he was asked). He made no comparison.
There was no comparison, that is nothing more than\ a manifestation of your convoluted and biased thoughts.
You are wrong.
Yes. He was asked about the time period (an irrelevant fact). And he said than. Compared to now, they were happier. Pre (before) welfare. Comparison.
Pre was the time period. No comparison was made.Again, pre (before) welfare. Repeating the question has nothing to do with it. He made the comparison.
That is a lie.Correct. Phil was asked about blacks prior to civil rights. He answered by saying "they" were happier then than now.
More irrelevant deflection.
He did nothing wrong.
So of course he needs to be defended against bigoted idiots.
Wrong.But, what he said was either racist or so ass-backward that most people would distance themselves from those comments.
Really. Explain to me how thisThat is a lie.
isn't saying "they" were happier then than now."Robertson continued, "Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues."
Pre was the time period. No comparison was made.
And it was the question.
He was not asked to compare that time period to that of today. There was no comparison made.
Wrong.
Nonsense. Explain to us how it wasn't racist or ass-backwards.
Really. Explain to me how this
isn't saying "they" were happier then than now."
I'd love to hear it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?