Fledermaus
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 134,376
- Reaction score
- 37,416
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Oh, and as previously stated, you no longer have room to cry about “whataboutism” given your constant use of it in attempts to defend South Korea’s brutal military dictators.
As for the Soviet Union, it’s funny you should mention them......because guess who the PKK’s biggest supporters during the Cold War were?
Yes, and the US Army and CIA have aided numerous terrorist groups from the precursors to Colombia’s AUC, to several Cuban groups known for blowing up civilian airliners and murdering diplomats, to the Contras. Your point?
Btw, the “it’s justified when we do it but terrorism when they do it” argument should have died with the Cold War.
Yes keep to your claim that US servicemen are all a bunch of terrorists. Yes I am sure that will convince everyone that your rantings are not just the butthurt outbursts from a basic training failure.
Yeah the iraqs had such strong support to kick America out ofcountry that they passed a non binding resolution that was more then a symbolic gesture. How very convincing.
I said Irans response was weak. Which it was. That you have to lie and pretend I claimed that TBI is no big deal or weak just proves that you don’t mind lying as long as it helps sooth your pain from failure.
You pretend it was just a job to you yet your entire world out look changed the moment you got the boot. Yeah that sounds believable.
At some point in your life you are going to have to just let it go and move on. Keeping all this rage inside is just not healthy.
More utterly meaningless sobbing about “whataboutism”
As previously stated, he was about as much a “terrorist” as any American soldier who trained the Kurds was. Watching you tearfully sob because you are obsessed with a job and you think everyone else is too is downright comical.
Repeating the same drivel in larger font can’t change the facts.
As already shown, the US ITSELF is responsible for funding and arming numerous terrorist groups. Does that mean any Americans are valid targets?
As already shown, you have no room to talk after engaging in it dozens of times to try and defend South Korea’s dictators.
You started sobbing about Quds Force arming terrorists, and I pointed out that the US has done the EXACT SAME thing.
Yet another case of the US throwing stones in a glass house.
Meaningless and hypocritical sputtering from you, as usual.
And nothing which can change the fact that the strike was actively counterproductive and done solely for petty revenge.
Meaningless and hypocritical sputtering from you, as usual.
And nothing which can change the fact that the strike was actively counterproductive and done solely for petty revenge.
No that is not my logic at all. You are just telling lies again. Nothing new here.Gee bud, keep whining because I pointed out that under YOUR excuse for “logic” they would qualify as such. The simple fact of the matter is that the US lives in a glass house, and throwing bricks calling other nations’ officers “terrorists” for doing the same thing we do is ignorant at best. But by all means keep humiliating yourself with the “it’s terrorism when they do it and not when we do it” shtick
Gee bud, do you think the dozens of American servicemen who got their brains scrambled think it was “weak”?You literally downplayed it again in the very next sentence
As repeatedly stated, your “beliefs” can’t change the facts bud.
At some point you are going to have to face the real world....but I doubt you can.
What was it revenge for, and why was that revenge petty?
No that is not my logic at all. You are just telling lies again. Nothing new here.
So when was the last time the US purposly target civilians. Because that is a big part of soleimani did. But I get it you have to attack America because of your failure.
Their individual event was not weak. On a strategic level it was incredibly weak. That you can’t understand the difference is a you problem.
For him fighting against the US when we blundered into Iraq.
It was petty because there are FAR more important things to deal with— for example, fighting against ISIS— than trying to get “revenge”
Lol yes, it absolutely is. You’ve been screaming “terrorism” over and over when he literally didn’t do anything different than US covert ops training similarly groups.
Gee, all those war criminals the US pardoned— or didn’t even bother trying— not ringing a bell? Alan West tortured a prisoner and it “hurt” his career so much he’s chair of the Texas GOP. And that’s not even getting into shit like the AC-130 strike at Kunduz or the years of systematic torture, in many cases of innocent civilians, at “Black Sites”.
Furthermore, it was far from the first time it happened. Targeting of civilians in strategic bombing campaigns was commonplace throughout the Vietnam War, and insurgents like the Contras were trained to go after non-combatants while the CIA bombed refineries and mined harbors.
Well gee bud, they blew up a bunch of Americans and got away scot free. That’s not “weak” at all.
They wouldn't. That's why the maniac dictator of Russia had to threaten the entire human race with nukes, when invading Ukraine. Because he knew his incompetent, outdated army would be turned to dust by American forces in a matter of days.Calling the US a “pit bull” is downright comical....and the Russians have “slapped” us many times over the years, which makes your argument nonsensical. For example, they helped blow plenty of US bombers out of the sky over Hanoi and Haiphong.
The Iranians are more than capable of doing it themselves, but arguing that the Russians “wouldn’t dare” to hit back, as they see it, is ignorant.
Oh look, more tearful whining about “communism” and “terrorism”. The hit was not “defense”; it was nothing more than a petty attempt at revenge, and under your own “logic” US servicemen and CIA agents would be equally valid targets due to the US’ policies of arming, training and supporting numerous terrorist groups.
They wouldn't. That's why the maniac dictator of Russia had to threaten the entire human race with nukes, when invading Ukraine. Because he knew his incompetent, outdated army would be turned to dust by American forces in a matter of days.
Calling the US a “pit bull” is downright comical....and the Russians have “slapped” us many times over the years, which makes your argument nonsensical. For example, they helped blow plenty of US bombers out of the sky over Hanoi and Haiphong.
Not recent history. Things change, times change. And now Russia is a shell of a country with an outdated, incompetent military that would never dare to directly attack even one American tent.Except history shows they would....and did.
Except history shows they would....and did.
Gee bud, and the Iraqis were going to greet us as liberators
Arrogance and overconfidence leads to military disaster, but the US simply refuses to learn.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?