• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dr. Fauci On GOP Criticism: ‘Attacks On Me, Quite Frankly, Are Attacks On Science’

j-mac

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
41,104
Reaction score
12,203
Location
South Carolina
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
“Attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science,” Fauci said Wednesday. “All of the things I have spoken about, consistently, from the very beginning, have been fundamentally based on science. Sometimes those things were inconvenient truths for people.”


What an arrogant jerk!
 
What an arrogant jerk!
He's not wrong. Fauci has become a focal point for the people who are angry that they had to act like adults for fifteen months and care about their fellow citizen with a $2 piece of cloth.
 
He's not wrong. Fauci has become a focal point for the people who are angry that they had to act like adults for fifteen months and care about their fellow citizen with a $2 piece of cloth.
And if it’s proven that he knew what the wuhun lab was doing, he’s toast. Btw, he was against masks before they became a way to control the public.
 
And if it’s proven that he knew what the wuhun lab was doing, he’s toast. Btw, he was against masks before they became a way to control the public.
You do realize that Fauci gets emails from both credible people and quacks alike, often with contradictory narratives, right?
 
And if it’s proven that he knew what the wuhun lab was doing, he’s toast. Btw, he was against masks before they became a way to control the public.
"If" is a tiny word with potentially huge implications. No, he was not 'against' masks; like every other scientist and medical professional he knew nothing about a novel virus or how it was transmitted. That was eighteen months ago, and it appears some people still can't figure out that we have learned a great deal about the virus in the interim. That would be you; so quit the dumb references to something totally irrelevant to today.
 
I’m the victim? Fauci made the ignorant statement, not me...
Righties' opinions of Fauci is ignorant AND arrogant. but hey, Fox told them to have a hate on for Fauci, so that is all they needed :rolleyes:
 
Righties' opinions of Fauci is ignorant AND arrogant. but hey, Fox told them to have a hate on for Fauci, so that is all they needed :rolleyes:
No, I actually saw it watching Chuck Todd....my jaw hit the floor.
 
Really? I said “I’m science”?
He said it's an attack on science...so we ate gonna parse the ever living shit out of this when you know exactly how he meant it but you need to play up the drama so you can play victim...


Please this argument is weak as shit. Do better
 
He said it's an attack on science...so we ate gonna parse the ever living shit out of this when you know exactly how he meant it but you need to play up the drama so you can play victim...


Please this argument is weak as shit. Do better
he just wants to engage you in an endless argument about nothing, I have better things to do ;)
 
Fauci is up to his neck in gain of function that caused this....

Actually, Trump is.

"But in 2017, the government under the Trump administration released new guidelines for gain-of-function research, signaling an end to the blanket moratorium. And the news from 2019 suggests that dangerous projects are proceeding.

Experts in biosecurity are concerned the field is heading toward a mistake that could kill innocent people. They argue that, to move ahead with research like this, there should be a transparent process with global stakeholders at the table. After all, if anything goes wrong, the mess we’ll face will certainly be a global one."

 
he just wants to engage you in an endless argument about nothing, I have better things to do ;)
I'll argue till I don't have the time here at work.
I got 11 hours to kinda kill
 
Back
Top Bottom