sure you weren't. Question, why do you think that money would mean someone wouldn't rape a woman?
He said you liked a post that was about violence against another poster....that was you, unless an imposter is here using your name.I don't know what you're talking about. If you see me break a rule, report it, but let me just say this. Threatening me isn't going to be a winning strategy for you.
I am not lying...we can see by your posts...you said he hit her...you didn't say accused of by anonymous people that didn't see it. You said he slept with the nanny, not noting the fact that it wasn't a nanny at all and that he was separated....you called him an abuser and a cheater...that is saying he is guilty...not let's wait and see what comes out.
Why do I have to explain something so irritatingly stupid to you when you know perfectly well what I was saying?
Of course someone rich and famous would and has raped a woman.
No, someone rich and famous has never raped a woman in broad daylight in the middle of a public space. Perhaps some don't have the mental capacity to distinguish between the two.
Oh do I ? Was it not you who said that because he is rich he wouldn't rape someone, because he can pay for it? Really? no one ever ? Does Epstein ring a bell?Why do I have to explain something so irritatingly stupid to you when you know perfectly well what I was saying?
Of course someone rich and famous would and has raped a woman.
No, someone rich and famous has never raped a woman in broad daylight in the middle of a public space. Perhaps some don't have the mental capacity to distinguish between the two.
Go find google and then weep when you find out it is me. I don't expect you to apologize...that would take character.
From my vantage point, she doesn't know perfectly well what anyone says.
Oh do I ? Was it not you who said that because he is rich he wouldn't rape someone, because he can pay for it? Really? no one ever ? Does Epstein ring a bell?
Oh you did huh? This you? You can run away again like you did the last time without apologizingI reviewed all my posts. I never wrote that he did it.
You're lying.
I would like to hear presidential candidate Harris explain how she reconciles potential first "gentleman's" past with domestic abuse in light of her very vocal past condemnations of domestic abusers and sexual assault perpetrators. There are allegedly three witnesses to Doug committing an act of domestic abuse.
I especially want to know if Kamala Harris really does “believe women” who are “survivors of sexual assault.
So true, all you care about is the unsubstantiated accusation from so long ago....I doubt she's going to sue for damages, and don't see why that's relevant.
dobieg this you? You are implying his being rich excludes him from sexual assault....you do realize that it is about power right? A dressing room isn't as public as you think it is..If you want to believe a billionaire decided out of the blue to sexually assault some random woman in broad daylight in the middle of a department store that's up to you.
There are millions of Americans who find the story beyond comical because it makes zero sense, there was no police report and the woman couldn't even remember the year is supposedly happened. You've defended this comedy in the past and you'll continue to defend it because you hate your political opponent that much even though you know better.
I'm with you.Either that or she's one of the more dishonest posters here.
I know which way I lean.
by high profile attorneys? Yeah, no.I see. You don't know much about abuse. It goes unreported more often than not. Women can go through years of abuse, decades, and not report it. You're going to tell them it didn't happen???
Today I get to watch a desperate right winger demanding that people prove a negative.How do you know that "Not one single person has leveled a charge of domestic violence, assault, sexual harassment, etc against Doug.
Not a single one+
Sean Connery said it best.
Joking!
I just quoted you saying he did it above....no you aren't a proponent of innocent until proven guilty...Trump was found guilty and yet, here you are voting for him...I'm with you.
I reviewed each of my posts on the alleged slapping the gf claim, and nowhere in any of my twenty-five posts to the thread did I write what Clara has accused me of writing, that Doug Emhoff did it. Clara, otoh, has tried to get me to prove that he did it. How could I do that when the article was clear to say Emhoff was accused by three people who chose to remain anonymous?..
How could I do that when I wrote yesterday that Emhoff denied the allegations to be true, and then I wrote this:
I'm a big proponent of innocent until proven guilty, so the ball is now in the court of the three accusers to step forward with their proof, come out of anonymity, or let it go.
No, you didn't. I never wrote that Doug Emhoff did it. You're lying.I just quoted you saying he did it above....
That's a lie.no you aren't a proponent of innocent until proven guilty...
Trump was found guilty and yet, here you are voting for him...
dobieg this you? You are implying his being rich excludes him from sexual assault....you do realize that it is about power right? A dressing room isn't as public as you think it is..
Also, this very same rich dude....alledgedly raped a 13 year old at Mar a Lago with Epstein at the helm. Want to say that Epstein, a billionaire didn't do this stuff?
Are you saying that you didn’t like the quoted comment?I don't know what you're talking about.
post 385...I most certainly did. YOU SAID his past with domestic violence...that implies he is guilty. of domestic violence....you didn't say his alleged past.No, you didn't.
That's a lie
I don't need your permission to do anything.
I know exactly what you were saying...you were saying he is too rich to do something that stupid...yet, he has TWENTY FIVE accusations, including from a 13 year old...You'd have to have an ounce of common sense to understand what I was saying and it's nowhere close to what you're implying.
You already know that but it doesn't matter to you.
Are you saying that you didn’t like the quoted comment?
I know exactly what you were saying...you were saying he is too rich to do something that stupid...yet, he has TWENTY FIVE accusations, including from a 13 year old...
Not only that....he has a nasty, nasty habit of hanging out with pedophiles and sex traffickers....you know, you are who you associate with.
Why can't you answer the question? Did you or did you not like the post?Just a suggestion. Like another poster already has done, don't make this thread personally about me. The topic is above.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?