- Joined
- Mar 31, 2020
- Messages
- 63,617
- Reaction score
- 64,858
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Yeah, I know...
It's basically enabling him.
Yeah, I know...
At the very least it's exposing his routine stupidity. He might learn one day, but I'm not optimistic...It's basically enabling him.
At the very least it's exposing his routine stupidity.
Smallpox is over 30 times deadlier then Covid so by your standards people should’ve permanently stayed locked in their homes and made no effort to do anything
is the argument you’re making.
or that you expect modern people to be 30 times more cowardly.
I don’t care about any of the graphs. I do not support forced vaccination and mask mandates for this virus. I can provide all the graphs proving that if blacks were all imprisoned the murder rate would drop by half and if it saves “just one life, isn’t it worth it”? No, it is not, there is right and wrong in Government policy and making the right decision often means some will be harmedThe mortality rate for Smallpox was approximately 30%. The mortality rate for COVID-19 is around 2.07% (in the US).
Obviously you missed school when they were teaching long division.
That being said, people WERE "locked in their homes" when Smallpox epidemics struck. That remained the case until a vaccine was developed for Smallpox, at which point it became mandatory to get vaccinated (so that people did NOT have to stay "locked in their homes").
The argument that I am making is that,
Now that there is a vaccine for COVID-19, people should get vaccinated rather than risk having to be "locked in their homes".
but I see that that is too subtle for you to grasp.
It is people like you who are producing results like this
and this
because this
is their response to vaccination.
I do not care.
I don’t care what the number on some chart is. I will not consent to martial law so a tiny number of infirm people can be safer. That is insane
That is not the true fatality rate since we know most cases are asymptomatic. Therefore there is likely two to three times as many people who have had Covid 19 and were never tested because they were never sick.
I suspect this was the case for me since I had a unusually bad reaction to the first dose of the vaccine
Lol that was the point.
you apparently trust the same media without question whenever it meets your agenda though
A monarchy with a correct thinking monarch.
Not a totalitarian technocratic bureaucracy
It is in effect in Australia. They’ve allowed police to enter homes without warrant, survi citizens with drones, and even told people not to engage in conversation. And you have not condemned these measures. Therefore you support them.
I don’t care about any of the graphs. I do not support forced vaccination and mask mandates for this virus. I can provide all the graphs proving that if blacks were all imprisoned the murder rate would drop by half and if it saves “just one life, isn’t it worth it”? No, it is not, there is right and wrong in Government policy and making the right decision often means some will be harmed
Did you bother read your own link?
It forbids you from leaving your house. Except to go to the nearest grocery store, requires government permits to move, forbids you from driving in your car more then 5km from your house, requires you to have proof of valid excuse, and by the way the military is assisting in enforcing these.
this is all elements of martial law present.
you are not free to go where you want, to choose where to shop, or even to change residence unless some fat lesbian affirmative action hire signs off on it.
Money is not just money. Of course you’re being dishonest there and you are being dishonest about Catholic teaching which you don’t even believe in.
Dude ..they had " vaccination raids " where the police would go door to door and pull people out and forcibly vaccinate them. If they found someone..even a baby that had smallpox...they would forcibly take them away to the "pest house" .Vaccination for smallpox, which unlike coronavirus, actually reduced populations and was dangerous to healthy working age people.
and even then there was no permission required to move or 5km limits from your house or the idea society should be put on hold indefinitely
Nope, lock up in your house
What you dont get is that you completely didnt understand about how the virus doesnt 'starve' in a single host, but that we need to starve it....keep it from spreading...basics 101...and over and over...you didnt get it.
And 203 if I remember (I dont care all that much anymore) quoted it...but you dont even realize it.
Modern education may be bad....if you are any example. Good lord.
Heh, I seriously doubt it but more to the point, you cannot demonstrate it.Bet I got a better education than you. Clearly you don't know how to back up your statements.

Bet I got a better education than you. Clearly you don't know how to back up your statements.
Heh, I seriously doubt it but more to the point, you cannot demonstrate it.
I intentionally write to the mainstream publishing guideline of the 4th-6th grade levels, so if you (still) cant understand the important distinction in how I applied the word 'starve,' you are the one who's education fails under scrutiny.
OTOH, you could try to educate yourself on it, rather than continually try to save face by attempting to denigrate me.
View attachment 67348847
I love it!!!!! You just PROVED me right again! I didnt write 'on' a 4th grade level. I wrote 'to' that level. You couldnt even understand that post!You SAY you're writing on a 4th grade level, but what you end up writing is something like a 4th grader might produce. And like a 4th grader you're unable to admit your faults.

I love it!!!!! You just PROVED me right again! I didnt write 'on' a 4th grade level. I wrote 'to' that level. You couldnt even understand that post!
And you're so invested in struggling to look 'right on the Internetz' you've embarrassed yourself further. OMG, perfect!![]()
![]()
Goodness, now I'm starting to feel guilty.
Please stop...this isnt on-topic. Let me know when you figure out the way I was using 'starve' in our original conversation please.
View attachment 67348853
You clumsily used “starve” in a jargonistic manner and attempted to dance the superiority dance when I asked you to clarify what you meant. That “I know something you don’t know” attitude is the thing that puts all of your posts on a 4th grade level.
I understood what you meant with your half baked definition. What you have never answered is how you can be sure that in the process of being “starved” the virus will not produce compensatory mutations. You represented that our precautions were going to sideline the virus so that it wouldn’t have the chance to create new mutations. I think you believe this in an uncritical, almost religious manner, and that’s why you got so pissy when I suggested that the chance of mutations might actually rise, since you admit the original virus wouldn’t actually “die” at all.

Nope, I used it in an accurate descriptive manner and you were unable to connect that with the way that the variants develop...which has been discussed in the media for months and quite intensely since July.
"I know something" that any intelligent person with a mind open to the changes we're facing with covid knows. It's sad that you dont.
I've been studying epidemiology as a layperson for more than 2 decades with a foundation in microbiology, evolutionary biology, and population dynamics in college. My 'beliefs' are based on years of study, in a 'non-politicized manner', rather than just this one-off situation. What's your background in epidemiology or any of the related fields of science?
You still didnt indicate that you understand the use of 'starve' as I used it. "Starve" is the way the mechanism is described in many epidemiology books. Your attempt at using multi-syllabic words didnt help indicate that...and its laughable.
I have explained in post after post on this forum how the potential for mutations develops/is developing. I probably did earlier in this thread. However I'm no longer convinced you're capable of understanding it...either because of your personal limitations or resentful bias.
I've offered many times on the forum to share my booklist from my epidemiology library. Most of the book are written for the layman and are fascinating. It's an Excel spreadsheet, let me know if you're interested.
View attachment 67348989