- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 113,014
- Reaction score
- 60,601
- Location
- Sarasota Fla
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Why not post the rest of it, so those not familiar with the information can see what it really says.
http://www.sldn.org/page/-/Website/The%20Law/The%20Law%20-%20Statute.pdf
Sorry for the crappy formatting, it's a pdf and I am not going back over the whole thing and removing line breaks. Note number 2 and 3. 2 is the one that almost all DADT discharges come from, since 1 is hard to prove and 3 is rare.
c. Separation policy. Homosexual conduct is grounds for separation from the Army under the terms set forth in
paragraph a(3). AR 600–8–24, AR 635–200, AR 135–175, and AR 135–178 govern Army separation policies.
You wanted me to quote the entire thing, instead of just the actual directive? What exactly are you talking about, quote the part you think I left out, I provided a link for you.
I like your posts I also like Redress' posts.
Speaking of regs, have you found that reg that said the opposite sex could not shower together yet? Funny how you never did show that, but are quick to insist on documentation.
What the hell are you even talking about, cuz?
Here's the part that you left out, that proves you wrong.
Although I disagree with Redress on almost every issue I find her to be fair and most of all she is a shipmate,,,,,,,,,,I can't say the same for DD whose stalking and stale rhetoric has grown old and boring.........I rarely respond to him anymore because when I do I get in trouble besides he never brings up anything new to the table.............
Moderator's Warning: |
The hypothetical was that being Jewish in the military was the same policy as DADT. A Jewish service member writes an private email to his Rabbi. His email is hacked by his superiors. They find out he is Jewish. They kick him out. Is that acceptable, or is that only ok for gay people?
And let me ask you another question "cuz." How many gay people do you actually know?
Funny how you gave partial docs and chopped off the part tht proved you wrong.
Never claimed otherwise. What I said is that discharges under DADT are for telling, not for being gay. Almost no one(if any are at all) are discharged for actually being gay.
Actually, last I heard no discharges are being processed currently for DADT violations at all, but that may have changed.
I linked the whole thing and quoted the portion relevant to the claim I was making. You linked to two huge documents neither one of which said what you claimed, and have yet to show any backup for your claim.
You're still wrong. :rofl
If they weren't gay, there wouldn't be anything not to tell...sheeesh!!
I posted a part of the same regulation that you posted. Mine was on the next page...LOL
Who's email got hacked?
I am referring to your claim that there was a regulation against opposite sexes showering together. You claimed it, never documented it despite a couple failed attempts.
Mike Almy. Is it acceptable? And how many gays do you actually know?
I can't find the actual regulation, but obviously it exists, because--in the army at least--males and females can't share billets.
Who's email got hacked?
Of course hacking someone's email isn't acceptable. But, what's your point?
And, what's me knowing someone who is gay, have to do with a ****ing thing? But, to answer your question: **** if I know! I don't care if any of my friends are gay.
What matters is that I think that anyone who opposes a repeal of DADT is a bigot. They don't oppose it for practical reasons (because there are none), they oppose it because they don't like gays. My point is that you are saying gays are rapist perverts who want to rape any man they see, but if you knew an actual gay person, you would know its not true.
And my point is, that this is what happens under DADT.
Mike Almy. Is it acceptable? And how many gays do you actually know?
I will take that one.........I know one, I use to know two but one was the partner of the other one I know and sadly he died frrom AIDS...I went to his funeral........He was a good friend.........His partner is on my golf team............He has a 2 handicap and is the best golfer on our team... (I have a 9 handicap) He is Conservative and we discuss politics all the time.........He is not hard core like the liberals here...........He believes that the economy and the deficit are the most important issues we face........He would like to see Civil Unions (as would I) and thinks DADT is fine........He just wants to live his life in peace and harmony and I agree with him..........Oh by the way he is a retired Navy Commander........
You can oppose DADT repeal without being a bigot. Being wrong does not mean you are a bigot. Some honestly do think that if gays can serve openly it will hurt military readiness. Of course, some people think the world is flat too...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?