Not only sarcastic, but oblivious to fact....while avoiding the implication in arguing the racial divide on homicides. The rw plays the "jus say'n card by stating the levels, but don't want to say why they are such beyond wink/nudge.
D'oh!
Hilarious.
You are the one oblivious to fact, as that sarcasm contained fact.
There are more whites in poverty that there is blacks, yet by respective population, whites commit fewer crimes than blacks do.
You just don't like the facts.
while avoiding the implication in arguing the racial divide on homicides
Bs. Ignoring the implications? That appears to be what you do.
It is exactly those stats concerning this topic "murder" which show the study you like to cling to, to be a farce.
The rw plays the "jus say'n card by stating the levels, but don't want to say why they are such beyond wink/nudge.
Facts are facts.
You want to lamely shift the blame to "poverty".
Poverty does not cause a person not to care about another and cause them damage.
Poverty does not cause a person to act out criminally or violently.
The fact that the majority of all races who are in poverty are not out there making that poor choice s an indication that it is not caused by poverty.
That pretty much shows it isn't caused by poverty.
Get a clue. Crime is a choice, it is not caused by poverty.
Sans exceptions to the rule, there are only two variables that can account for the choice of acting out criminally. Nature and nurture.
prove a negative...brilliant. another example of fingers faster than reason.
I see reality has escaped your grasp again.
Mexico, by not acting to stop them (a deliberate action on their part), is exporting them.
As already linked, and debated, "crime" is directly correlated to levels of poverty regardless of race.
You linked bunk.
A single limited study of generalities that falls apart when the specifcs stats of this topic "murder" got pointed out.
Rational discourse! As if! I have attempted rational debate on this very topic previously with you and xcon and turtle in the thread linked, never have I been able to get you or your ilk to bring your arguments to a conclusion on the causes....beyond irrational and unsupported claims of "culture", which is nothing more than Murray-ist genetics argument.
Is that what you think you engaged in?
iLOL
No you didn't.
You provided an "in-general" bunk study that fell apart when the specific stats surrounding this very topic, "murder" were introduced.
Or in a simpler expression. The study you provided could not and did not account for the disparity in murders.
I'm pretty sure Ex-Con already has.
D'oh!
The tweet wasn't racist. Some of the information it contained got transposed, making it incorrect in regards to those two specifics.
That is all and there is nothing racist about it.
To claim it is racist is just stupid.
