Donald Trump allegedly handed Prince Andrew a list of masseuses after the two men engaged in a sick conversation.

[W_Heisenberg]

Donald Trump allegedly handed Prince Andrew a list of masseuses after the two men engaged in a sick conversation about “p---y.”

The interaction reportedly happened in the year 2000, not long after they had been introduced by their mutual friends, Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.

The claim was made in a report in the Daily Mail on Saturday by the respected royal writer and historian Andrew Lownie. Lownie is the author of Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, a new investigative biography of Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson.
The book has already ignited controversy with a series of astonishing claims, including that Epstein described Andrew as “more obsessed with p---y than me.”


—

Prince Andrew and Donald Trump’s Sick ‘P***y’ Conversations Revealed

An explosive new book heaps more shame on the disgraced prince.

www.thedailybeast.com

—

Could this be true? Could it indicate Trump sexually abused children?

 

[Airyaman]

Hmmm, masseuses are typically adults, so this would not mean either were kiddy diddlers.

 

[Allan]

Hmmm, masseuses are typically adults, so this would not mean either were kiddy diddlers.

These guys preferred younger masseuses.

 

[PeteEU]

If it had been almost anything but the Daily Nazi.. then it might have a bit more credibility. Saying that, if he has the actual documentation or something.. then it is a game changer.

 

[Mycroft]

Could this be true?

Maybe.

Could it indicate Trump sexually abused children?

No.

 

[j brown's body]

If it had been almost anything but the Daily Nazi.. then it might have a bit more credibility. Saying that, if he has the actual documentation or something.. then it is a game changer.

It is quoting another source.

 

[PeteEU]

It is quoting another source.

Yea the Daily Nazi, aka the Daily Mail, who has an exclusive from the dude.. because he is coming out with another book. You made me click the link to the Daily Mail.. now I have to take an acid bath.

Listen I am not dismissing the accusations at all, it is just that the "source" aka the Daily Nazi, is a know anti-Royal newspaper with historical links to Nazis.

 

[lwf]

Yea the Daily Nazi, aka the Daily Mail, who has an exclusive from the dude.. because he is coming out with another book. You made me click the link to the Daily Mail.. now I have to take an acid bath.

Listen I am not dismissing the accusations at all, it is just that the "source" aka the Daily Nazi, is a know anti-Royal newspaper with historical links to Nazis.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mail/

 

[uptower]

 

[Emlee]

Apparently the story didn’t originate with the DailyMail, it originated with Andrew Lownie, who wrote a book called the Rise and Fall of the House of York, and that was included in the book.

Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York - William Collins

Entitled is the first joint biography of Prince Andrew and his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson by renowned royal biographer and literary agent, Andrew Lownie.

www.williamcollinsbooks.co.uk

 

[Lutherf]

Why does it matterr what the source was? As long as it's bad for Trump we HAVE to accept it as truth!

 

[W_Heisenberg]

Apparently the story didn’t originate with the DailyMail, it originated with Andrew Lownie, who wrote a book called the Rise and Fall of the House of York, and that was included in the book.

Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York - William Collins

Entitled is the first joint biography of Prince Andrew and his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson by renowned royal biographer and literary agent, Andrew Lownie.

www.williamcollinsbooks.co.uk

The online commentary about Lownie suggests he is generally well respected as an author, biographer, and historian.

 

[W_Heisenberg]

Why does it matterr what the source was? As long as it's bad for Trump we HAVE to accept it as truth!

All the speculation would end if Trump made public the references to him in the Epstein files, which of course he has the power to make public.

 

[Lutherf]

All the speculation would end if Trump made public the references to him in the Epstein files, which of course he has the power to make public.

You know damned well that releasing everything wouldn't change anything. Unless the transcripts say what YOU want them to say they’ll be called incomplete or manipulated. You have already made up your mind and no amount of evidence will change that.

 

[W_Heisenberg]

You know damned well that releasing everything would change anything. Unless the transcripts say what YOU want them to say they’ll be called incomplete or manipulated. You have already made up your mind and no amount of evidence will change that.

I don’t think my own opinion matters that much. What matters is what the general public thinks, and the general public will always be suspicious of Trump so long as be continues to hide the information contained in the files. A release of the information would help discourage speculation that Trump did something wrong. So, if he has nothing to hide, he has nothing to lose by releasing the information. Sounds like you’re worried about what’s in the files. I wonder if you’ve made up your own mind about them.