Donald Trump: 'I Don't Really' See A Rise In White Nationalism | HuffPost
A white nationalist is a suspect in the New Zealand mosque attack that left dozens dead.
President Donald Trump said Friday that he doesn’t think white nationalism is a growing problem.
In a press conference after he vetoed Congress’ attempt to end his national emergency over border wall funding, Trump was asked various questions in relation to the mass shootings at two mosques in New Zealand on Friday. According to a pool report, one reporter asked the president if he saw a rise in white nationalism around the world.
============================================
Trump did not disavow white nationalists. Why should he disavow one of his most potent weapons in his climb towards becoming king or emperor?
President Donald Trump said Friday that he doesn’t think white nationalism is a growing problem.
The comment is damn kooky.... "becoming king or emperor" off the wacky scale!
As usual, the President was right. So-called "white nationalism" is NOT a major problem. Those FEW individuals who call themselves "nationalists" or "supremacists" are what other people refer to as "losers." They have NO influence on government policy. They simply serve as a convenient whipping boy for those activists who want to blame everything on a particular ethnicity.
Donald Trump: 'I Don't Really' See A Rise In White Nationalism | HuffPost
A white nationalist is a suspect in the New Zealand mosque attack that left dozens dead.
President Donald Trump said Friday that he doesn’t think white nationalism is a growing problem.
In a press conference after he vetoed Congress’ attempt to end his national emergency over border wall funding, Trump was asked various questions in relation to the mass shootings at two mosques in New Zealand on Friday. According to a pool report, one reporter asked the president if he saw a rise in white nationalism around the world.
============================================
Trump did not disavow white nationalists. Why should he disavow one of his most potent weapons in his climb towards becoming king or emperor?
I'd say the white power deflectors are useful idiots for the white pride activists who are intent on trying to hang on to power based on ethnicity...eace
As usual, the President was right.
So-called "white nationalism" is NOT a major problem.
Those FEW individuals who call themselves "nationalists" or "supremacists" are what other people refer to as "losers."
They have NO influence on government policy.
They simply serve as a convenient whipping boy for those activists who want to blame everything on a particular ethnicity.
It's ridiculous to blame white nationalism for the NZ issue. You liberals say nationalism as if its something bad and that's because you must not know the meaning of the word. Nothing wrong with being a nationalist, love of country is what it means.
na·tion·al·ism
/ˈnaSH(ə)nəˌlizəm/Submit
noun
identification with one's own nation and support for its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations.
"their nationalism is tempered by a desire to join the European Union"
synonyms: patriotism, patriotic sentiment, allegiance/loyalty to one's country, loyalism, nationality; More
advocacy of or support for the political independence of a particular nation or people.
Liberals like to make it out to be something else. Any belief may be made into something else in the eyes of some. I'm not ashamed of being America first, not ashamed of being big on America exceptionalism and its more traditional heritage.
So-called "white nationalism" is NOT a major problem.
Your opinion deserves respectful consideration. That is the purpose of Internet discussion forums.
The vast majority of Caucasian Americans are not stupid.
They are not "trying to hang on to power."
Caucasian Americans, in general, have been the most generous people on earth.
Starting in the 1960s, Americans -- led by Democratic and Republican pols -- decided that it was time for change.
The 2008 presidential election was a true watershed.
Most Caucasians have accepted the fact that the United States of America is on track to become a non-Caucasian majority nation by the next century.
Most Caucasians graciously accept this fact and wish the best of luck to the new majority.
Have a nice day!
Your opinion deserves respectful consideration. That is the purpose of Internet discussion forums. The vast majority of Caucasian Americans are not stupid. They are not "trying to hang on to power." Caucasian Americans, in general, have been the most generous people on earth. Starting in the 1960s, Americans -- led by Democratic and Republican pols -- decided that it was time for change. The 2008 presidential election was a true watershed. Most Caucasians have accepted the fact that the United States of America is on track to become a non-Caucasian majority nation by the next century. Most Caucasians graciously accept this fact and wish the best of luck to the new majority. Have a nice day!
Your argument is flawed, what exactly is 'most' Caucasians??? I'm not claiming 'most' Whites fear the brown tide or rant that only a white, Christian America can thrive.
Am saying there is a strong contingent of Whites who want the white race to keep control of the key facets of this Republic.
The 60's were a dividing era where dixie crats fled the Democrat Party and became 'Reagan' Republicans. Strong democrat states are now strong republican states in the south. Little if any acceptance on the part of Southern white folks... :roll:
The 2008 election was a lightening rod not a watershed as the white pride groups attacked the first African/American President. Birthers ran wild and many (not most) white Americans in the fly-over states declared 'the blacks' would take over our government.
AMERICANS, in general, are the most generous people on the face of the earth.
Again this isn't about what 'most' Caucasians graciously accept- a comment by itself that raises an eyebrow or two. There is a strong faction of not so gracious white folks who resent the 'muddying' of our nation- you must read the posts in here and on the interwebz- that lament loudly and sometimes violently against immigrants from south of the border or from across the ocean.
I posed the thought- if there are in fact so few white 'terrorists' as Donald can be dismissive, then why ban ALL Muslims for the actions of so few???? If the white power thugs are to be ignored than why try and paint immigrants from south of the border as rapists, drug runners and violent criminals???
No bias here.... :doh
Well the same argument could be made about Muslim terrorists- a very few among the MILLIONS of peaceful followers of Islam.
Now don't be modest, white nationalism is alive and well in our politics, and they have had influence on government policy. Remember the ban tRump tried to push through in the beginning??? tRump is pandering to his white pride base when he declares 'crisis on the border', and calls asylum seekers drug runners and known criminals. Remember the President declared there were 'good' people marching with the white pride agitators during our recent white pride marches that had white power 'loser' killing an American citizen? Remember Congress 'loser' King??? He was very influential in Congress for years as chairman of various committees.
I'd say the white power deflectors are useful idiots for the white pride activists who are intent on trying to hang on to power based on ethnicity...eace
AMERICANS, in general, are the most generous people on the face of the earth.
"I don't really see a rise in white nationalism."
---white nationalist president
"I don't really see a rise in tobacco related cancer."
---cigarette company CEO
See how that works?
Your argument is flawed, what exactly is 'most' Caucasians??? I'm not claiming 'most' Whites fear the brown tide or rant that only a white, Christian America can thrive.
Am saying there is a strong contingent of Whites who want the white race to keep control of the key facets of this Republic.
The 60's were a dividing era where dixie crats fled the Democrat Party and became 'Reagan' Republicans. Strong democrat states are now strong republican states in the south. Little if any acceptance on the part of Southern white folks... :roll:
The 2008 election was a lightening rod not a watershed as the white pride groups attacked the first African/American President. Birthers ran wild and many (not most) white Americans in the fly-over states declared 'the blacks' would take over our government.
AMERICANS, in general, are the most generous people on the face of the earth.
Again this isn't about what 'most' Caucasians graciously accept- a comment by itself that raises an eyebrow or two. There is a strong faction of not so gracious white folks who resent the 'muddying' of our nation- you must read the posts in here and on the interwebz- that lament loudly and sometimes violently against immigrants from south of the border or from across the ocean.
I posed the thought- if there are in fact so few white 'terrorists' as Donald can be dismissive, then why ban ALL Muslims for the actions of so few???? If the white power thugs are to be ignored than why try and paint immigrants from south of the border as rapists, drug runners and violent criminals???
No bias here.... :doh
As usual, the President was right.
And, over the weekend at a rally in Michigan, Trump hit a(nother) milestone: He topped 3,000 untrue or misleading statements in 466 days in office.
That means that, on average, Trump says 6.5 things that aren't true a day. Every. Single. Day. (Trump is actually picking up the pace when it comes to not telling the truth; he has averaged nine untruths or misleading statements a day over the past two months, according to the Post's count.)
President Trump lied more than 3,000 times in 466 days - CNNPolitics
They have NO influence on government policy.
Should I tell him, or does anyone else want to take a crack at this first?
I have noticed your propensity to avoid uncomfortable truths.
Do you think that this kind of statement illustrates you as someone who cherishes the truth?
They put Trump in power.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?