• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Donald Trump’s alleged ‘sexual proclivities’ graphically detailed in new Epstein documents

I wouldn't. It's a very strong accusation. There needs to be more proof other than she just says it. Do you know if she has ever said this before?
This woman was intimidated into silence with threats against her and her attorney.

There is no reason to do that unless dumpletits has something to hide.
 
So...what makes this woman credible?
I'm sick of this MAGA bullshit defending Trump at every turn.

What makes MAGAts credible? We've seen and heard enough of Trump to know damn well she's credible.

Your defense of Trump is not a good look.
 
I wouldn't. It's a very strong accusation. There needs to be more proof other than she just says it. Do you know if she has ever said this before

This was from an under oath deposition from 2017. Lucky lady to still be breathing.
 
One has to read all the way through the article but in the second to last paragraph we have this -

What this looks like to me is that the paper decided to write an article about documents that contain accusations that were retracted by the accuser who then admitted that she made up stuff. The New Yorker article is paywalled but it's referenced in this ABC piece.

Ransome also gave an interview to NPR in 2021in which she never mentioned Trump, Branson, Dershowitz or anyone other than Epstein and Maxwell. The 2021 interview was well after her 2017 retraction so maybe she'd given up on the Trump angle by then. Fortunately, we have our local bevy of conspiracy theorists around here to remind us of the many debunked, retracted and fully made up stories about Trump.
The evidence says Trump was involved.

Covering for him is lame.
 
This was from an under oath deposition from 2017. Lucky lady to still be breathing.
If she's said it in the past, I feel that does lend her some credibility.
 
Back
Top Bottom