And how exactly has personality affected you and your family positively? What you are saying is this is an American idol issue now where popularity matters more than talent. So sad
Whether it's Schiff, Thompson, Cheney or Kinzinger - their duty on the 1/6 Committee is admirable. Schiff has already stated several times that until all facts/evidence are humanly collected (among the chickenshit obstructionists) the public will not be given the final report.
okeyyyyy and ____________?Glad that you admitted to this.That's progress, sport.
The riot/attack on the Capital was not planned by anyone in government. That is CT lunacy, sorry.Well that's what we'll know as part of this investigation. At first the common thought was the riot was just a protest gone sideways, now we continue to learn there was far more coordination among two particular groups. You also seem to forget the scope is broader than that as well, since it's also delving into other efforts to try and subvert the election results (calls to secretaries of state) and other officials.
Given what we've heard from the taped conversation between Trump and Raffensperger, that alone makes it more realistic than a CT theory.
The FBI has been investigating this for a year and a half. What the democrats are doing is putting on a show trial for the benefit of their trump hating, lunatic base.
Everyone but Trump hating leftist lunatics knows what happened.
This is just you entering 1/6Trutherism land. But I love a good CT as much as the next guy, so give me the worst case scenario of Trumps role in the Capital riot.
Lol Schiff. This is a political hit job on Trump masquerading as an investigation. How many times are you libs going to fall for this crap?
The people who committed crimes on 1/6 have been arrested and charged. These hearing are not about them. They are about Trump
Right. And many of those people, rightist Trumpists all, say that Trump provoked them.
Ask the libs.
There should be more to happen.
The investigation is about possible roles connected to 1/6/21 carried out by Congress Critters, DJT's cabinet members, staffers, lawyers connected to DJT and family members. Oh, and DJT too.
I think history has proven that, beauty contest, personality contest, American idol. Call it whatever you like. When I do my forecasts, I know from history that 94% of Republicans will vote for their candidates, 94% of Democrats will vote for theirs. Now independents are a bit tricky. They’re not political junkies, they’re less to non-partisans. Usually they pay little to no attention to politics until an election nears. They have no skin in the game. The racehorses are owned by the two major parties, equate that to the candidates they nominate. Many independents are like casual fans who watch the super bowl, vote in the general election, but don’t watch any of the regular season or even the playoffs. But they do vote and watch the super bowl.
Doesnt matter what they say. That they THOUGHT they were doing what Trump wanted is not evidence that Trump wanted them to do it or organized their activities.
I thought Trump was a bad idea the moment he announced his candidacy, and that's mainly because he's been a clown most of the time I've been aware of him (mid 80s). Locally, he was always a bit of a pariah, which is why many were shocked when he upended the GOP field. I completely agree with the sentiment of us having more than just the lesser of two evil options; that's not very inspiring as a voter at all.
No, its about trump. Period.
What remains to be seen is what level of coordination there was between the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers and any one in office. To rule it out completely seems a bit odd and reeks of the desire to look the other way because it is politically convenient. The very fact you had the former president actively calling secretaries of state to find votes opens up that possibility.
So its your belief that someone in the Trump administration (likely Trump himself) coordinated with a half dozen unarmed lunatics to overthrow the government. Do I have that right?
So Schiff, one of the most partisan members of congress and lead trump hater believes that the DOJ should investigate his arch nemesis for a plot that Schiff cant prove ever existed. Right. Sounds a lot like the last Schiff led witch hunt.
You haven't watched the hearings where all the evidence was from Trumps own people NOT Adam schiff.
If you have watched, what new evidence is there of Trumps involvement in the Capital riot?
The hearing is not just about the capital riot. That is but a small part of it.
It's not a question of belief, but finding out what happened considering the activities of the former administration to subvert the vote without any evidence whatsoever; a claim of fraud he made before a single vote was cast mind you. Had the former president just went about legal proceedings, failed and moved on, I'd be less inclined to think there was anything else going on. Since that wasn't the case, there is more doubt in my mind. I didn't think we'd be in a situation where we have the losing candidate staging a protest and asking the VP to not certify the results despite there being no evidence of fraud either, but here we are.
Great. So what evidence has been put forth that trump had something to do with the Capital rioters?
Apparently it just isn't true because it isn't, which is at least consistent rationale since some seem to be happy to accept the idea the only way Trump could have lost was through fraud. So in one breath some posters are asking how we can accept the possibility of government officials coordinating with violent groups without evidence, and in the other they accept the premise the only way Trump could lose is through unproven election fraud.
