• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DOJ moves to release grand jury testimony in Epstein case

N

Napoleon

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
38,841
Reaction score
14,437
Location
Columbus, OH
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
The decision to move forward with releasing the grand jury now lies with a federal judge. Judge Richard M. Berman in Manhattan, oversaw the criminal case against Epstein before his death, ruled a suicide, in 2019.
Click to expand...

Before making and ruling on the matter, the judge must consult with the victims and any uncharged person discussed in the testimony, as their identities are protected under federal law. Depending on what timeline is set, that process could take weeks, months, or longer to unfold.
Click to expand...

Judges have already released hundreds of documents in the Epstein saga. The majority of those held back were deemed unsuitable to be released because of federal laws that protects the privacy of Epstein victims and people not charged with crimes.
Click to expand...


The left has been strangely silent about this all day. A lot of democrats out there sweating bullets.

 
roberthughey said:
The Washington Post

Trump and Epstein had a relationship, but there’s no evidence of Trump wrongdoing​

A year ago, we scrubbed the public record. Here are our updated findings.

Yesterday at 4:03 p.m. EDT

Click to expand...
Notably:

“At the time, we dug deep into the public record and awarded Four Pinocchios to a Democratic lawmaker who suggested Trump’s name was all over the files released by Delgado. Nothing has emerged since then to change our assessment that there is no public evidence of inappropriate behavior by Trump related to Epstein.”
 
Napoleon said:
The left has been strangely silent about this all day. A lot of democrats out there sweating bullets.

Click to expand...
No, we're not.

That is just a lie.

We are wondering how much of the information on those records has been unlawfully suppressed.

Trump is lying child-rapist. Bondi is a confederate traitor who takes bribes and juggles Trump's junk on her chin. She is ABSOLUTELY NOT TO BE TRUSTED.
 
FBI and Justice officials soon realized that, with the required redactions, they would be releasing thousands of pages that were blacked out.

Putting any additional release in the hands of a federal judge could be a workaround to that problem because justice officials would no longer be responsible for the decision, or declination, to do so.

Judges have already released hundreds of documents in the Epstein saga. The majority of those held back were deemed unsuitable to be released because of federal laws that protects the privacy of Epstein victims and people not charged with crimes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We're going to get meaningless bullshit.
 
Napoleon said:
The left has been strangely silent about this all day. A lot of democrats out there sweating bullets.
Click to expand...
🤣😂🤣

Assumes facts not in evidence. You win the prize for today's most ridiculous assumption. In fact, it's safe to say that if the files contained anything at all that incriminated Democrats, Trump would have tried to put it on the front page of every major newspaper in the country before the street sweepers had even cleaned up the mess after his miserably attended inauguration non-event. Where on earth do you get this shit?
 
Napoleon said:
The left has been strangely silent about this all day. A lot of democrats out there sweating bullets.

Click to expand...
In the last day or two I've seen several people point out that this GJ testimony will only pertain to E and his crimes, and is not expected to discuss any other alleged offenders which is the whole point. These are not the "Epstein Files" we're looking for, it's just a Trump red herring to fool MAGA into thinking he's being transparent.
 
Loulit01 said:
FBI and Justice officials soon realized that, with the required redactions, they would be releasing thousands of pages that were blacked out.

Putting any additional release in the hands of a federal judge could be a workaround to that problem because justice officials would no longer be responsible for the decision, or declination, to do so.

Judges have already released hundreds of documents in the Epstein saga. The majority of those held back were deemed unsuitable to be released because of federal laws that protects the privacy of Epstein victims and people not charged with crimes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We're going to get meaningless bullshit.
Click to expand...

Follow the law!
 
MAGA will cherry pick grand jury testimony to launch another round of conspracy theories.
 
Last I checked, it was never the democrats making a huge deal about the Epstein case.

It has ALWAYS been MAGA.

Including in February when they made a huge deal about “releasing” files.


🤷‍♀️


Let’s see them.

I’m all for charging and prosecuting any and everyone on the flight logs.

Bring it.
 
lwf said:
Why just the grand jury testimony? Why not release the client files Bondi said she had on her desk?
Click to expand...
Because it's the one part of those files that is 100% under the control of a judge who will almost certainly block this move. (because it's not a normal thing to just release the entire contents of a grand jury's testimony). Then they can go "LIBRUL JUDGE WOULDNT LET US RELEASE THE FILES"

It's the sort of move that only works on people who were already true believers.
 
BirdinHand said:
Last I checked, it was never the democrats making a huge deal about the Epstein case.

It has ALWAYS been MAGA.

Including in February when they made a huge deal about “releasing” files.


🤷‍♀️


Let’s see them.

I’m all for charging and prosecuting any and everyone on the flight logs.

Bring it.
Click to expand...
These are the MAGAS Trump calls lunatics.

Imagine transparency is now lunacy, according to Trump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom