No, because the sole reason you’re asking the question has everything to do with babies and your belief women have no obligation to their own children
They do not havevthe obligation to risk their life for them
You're confusing 'fetuses" ( bolded ) with 'babies/children.' They are not one and the same. The former have zero legal rights; the latter have every legal right as any adult has.
Let me correct your question for you and perhaps it will help everything make sense.
Of course you are. The alternative is death.
Uh no. You were required to work as a slave
Yes. States criminalize behavior and are empowered to take possession of and incarcerate, under panopticon and fully regulated conditions, a human person, assigning them guards and wardens who have absolute control over that incarcerated person, including even if they sleep or eat, can be treated for illness, or have human contact, and largely without recourse to remedy.
How so?
Like I said, at least I have my freedom.
Was my question invisible?
Well sure - people are beaten and killed every day for all sorts of reasons.
You know why? It's about trust. That's beside the point I was making. The laws are not equal.
No. Get picked up and cannot afford bail? All still applies, sometimes lasting years.
A person is just a human. From a legal perspective, a law can dictate when a human is considered a person with rights.
Whatever floats your boat...Maybe we can enroll fetuses in CCW classes and give them a 9mm so they can stand their ground.
That does not change the fact that forcing a women to risk her life bringing a fetus to term is tyranny. Add that to the fact that the U.S. has the highest maternal death rate in the western world....Well, technically the Constitution once did contain sections allowing States with Slavery certain rights to do so (see Article IV Section 2 paragraph 3); to count Slaves as three-fifths of a person for Taxation and Representation (see Article I, Section 2 Paragraph 3).
However, while the 13th Amendment generally abolished slavery it still allowed "involuntary servitude, ...as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted." That permitted prison labor (chain gangs), and still allows prisons to compel inmates to work.
Penal labor in the United States - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So, even today the answer is "yes, under certain specific circumstances."
Of course, despite the OP's "forget the fetus for a moment" attempt to pretend this poll isn't really about abortion rights, it is leading to the argument that pregnancy is a form of bondage.
It is disingenuous to argue that the natural process whereby ALL human beings come into existence (including the mothers and fathers of every "inseminated ova") somehow equates to "allowing someone else to use your body." As if it is in fact "slavery" rather than an amazing biological mechanism which led to human existence itself, which is a false equivalence.
So to answer the actual underlying point; no, getting pregnant and carrying a child to term is not "allowing someone else to use your body." That is like stating everyone who can read this response exists as the result of "enslaving their mother's body."
Actually only a religion can do that and we do not make laws based on religion. The Roe decision used viability outside the womb as the time the State can claim that a fetus has rights. That is the only secular metric that makes sense. We now have a SC majority that believes their religion takes precedence over secular metrics.
This is stupid. Very stupid. Rethink this and try to respond again using facts rather than fiction.
Nope.