yesYou're wrong... That amendment is to protect freedom of speech from being abridged by the government. If they are in the Administration, they represent the government.
I was told:
yes
no
other
Click on the Grim17 linki n my post.I'm kinda lost without context....
on the general question... sure he has free speech rights... he has more free speech rights than any other citizen or person in the United States.
Click on the Grim17 linki n my post.
I was told:
yes
no
other
there's no link.. but it doesn't matter... i've said my piece and it's not worth debating any further.
there's no link.. but it doesn't matter... i've said my piece and it's not worth debating any further.
Just a quick FYI... When someone posts a quote, after the name of the poster there is a little blue square with two white arrows in it. Clicking this will link you to the original post, where you can review everything there.
It's a helpful little tool!
I was told:
yes
no
other
gotcha... I didn't know that before
thanks, love ..
A tad patronising, no?
Yes, it is very helpful, but when starting a new thread the OP should give a little more context if they're going to depend on another quote like that. Doesn't necessarily have to be their own opinion, just a little background info.Just a quick FYI... When someone posts a quote, after the name of the poster there is a little blue square with two white arrows in it. Clicking this will link you to the original post, where you can review everything there.
It's a helpful little tool!
Yes, of course they have free speech rights.I was told:
yes
no
other
A tad patronising, no?
not at all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?