- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 31,346
- Reaction score
- 19,890
- Location
- East Coast - USA
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
CC I can'tt do that because people like me are in the silent majority and we never get polled............
Got any studies, or links to studies that prove the nonsense you're talking about here?
I am sure Michelle Bachmann's husband could help pray away that gay problem.
Well, as a personal opinion, which i am entitled to, i dont want to see gay pda. But gays seem to want to put their sexuality in peoples faces moreso than heteros.
If you can' t see it as sin, consider it a negative force in the universe where we are all conneected by a common thread. It has no usefulness.
Well, it was in the past, when there was not so much noise around gays. And there was not so many gay propaganda. Do you know, that in the present time, the number of those who became gay under the influence of gay environment and gay propaganda is equal to the number of those who are gay by nature
people like me are in the silent majority
You are correct that we don't live under a theocracy but, My faith requires me to rebuke sin where I see it.
If you can' t see it as sin, consider it a negative force in the universe where we are all conneected by a common thread. It has no usefulness.
No. It would mean that there are places where the law has been amended to create the oxymoron of homosexual marriage. It doesn't mean it's not an oxymoron.
There is a silent majority on every issue....I belong to the Fleet Reserve Association and we have over 100 members and none have ever been polled on SSM.
So that 11 year old that was raised by lesbians speaks for all children of gay parents? Sorry but no, I've seen numerous children raised by gay parents that have turned out just fine both physically and psycologically.
Secondly, please explaiIn in your example how preventing those two gay parents from marrying solves that problem. Answer is it doesn't. It isn't illegal for gays to raise children. The anti-gay folks lost that battle long long ago.
So again, the anti-SSM crowd is losing not only to logic, but facts as well.
Yep the FedGov and the SCOTUS need to let the people of our states decide for themselves.Then we can both rebuke the abominations we see before us. I will rebuke christianity because I think it's bigoted bull****, and you can rebuke homosexuality because you think it's a sin. The only important part here is that neither you, me, or anyone else have any power to use the government to deny rights to the groups we don't like.
Are we talking about your faith?
Because SSM does serve a purpose. You may not like it but your likes/dislikes are irrelevant.
Exactly which "faith" is it you subscribe to? What faith "requires you to rebuke sin" ????
Hear that a lot do you?
Except that it's not a negative force and it's no more "useless" than any other relationship that doesn't produce children.
To all the gay couples out there, married or not, with children or not, you are the "negative force".
And unlike this bigoted horse****, the basis of their opinion is the fact that you're deliberately working to make their lives worse.
So, since the law prohibiting women from voting was amended, the phrase 'women voters' is an oxymoron, right?
Its fine to rebuke it, you just won't have the power to force anyone else to.
Why would I consider it a negative force when it's not? The rest is just your opinion and you are just upset you can't force it on others.
My goal is to have folks sin no more. Basically to save them from their selves.
I don't intend to force anything nor can I. I only want them to have eternal life.
Again it is written that homosexuality and thus SSM is a sin. That's all I need to know.Sin is subjective, so the chances of you achieving such a selfish goal (since the assumption is being made that it is what you believe is sin is what you believe folks should not do any more) are very small.
So, why does it lose at the polling place if all these polls are showing that Americans support changing the definition of marriage?
So, why does it lose at the polling place if all these polls are showing that Americans support changing the definition of marriage?
Again it is written that homosexuality and thus SSM is a sin. That's all I need to know.
I have no idea why it would be selfish other than I might get some good out of seeing someone step away from that lifestyle.
Yeah, the point is a no limits libertarian view of the world. There should be no limits on anything.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?