• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

do you support Democrats calls for violence/insurrection ?

agree with Democrats calls for violence/insurrection/upheaval


  • Total voters
    56
Mainly because they're sick and tired of school shootings.
Then allow the teachers to carry who wish to. Problem solved. Schools being a no gun zone, is an open invitation to law breakers.
 
Maybe the left should rethink the second amendment.

Yeah, maybe. It's not that I don't believe in self-defense, or the concept of resisting a tyrannical government. I would have supported the Black Panthers. But getting into a gun fight with Trump's red-hat militias is not on my bucket list.

I don't want to live in a society where I need to carry munitions, a canteen, camouflage, and hide in the shrubbery because some Elon simps want to own the libtards and thus destroyed civilization. This isn't a video game.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, maybe. It's not that I don't believe in self-defense, or the concept of resisting a tyrannical government. I would have supported the Black Panthers. But getting into a gun fight with Trump's red-hat militias is not on my bucket list.

I don't want to live in a society where I need to carry munitions, a canteen, camouflage, and hide in the shrubbery because some Elon simps want to own the libtards and destroyed thus civilization. This isn't a video game.
AI's hallucinate. Are you an AI?
 
I doubt those are insurrections.

Are these words insurrections?

...
"We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," he said.

they're out there fighting. The House guys are fighting. But it's, it's incredible.

And you have to get your people to fight. And if they don't fight, we have to primary the hell out of the ones that don't fight.

And we're going to have to fight much harder.

It was going to be great and now we're out here fighting

I'd fight. So I'd fight, they'd fight, I'd fight, they'd fight. Pop pop.

And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore.

good post

so Trump did NOT incite riots/insurrection in your opinion ? I don't think so either

the only problem I have with Democrats quotes right now is them circumventing Fed laws. That's illegal. If they want to bring fights physically/violence they are terribly outmanned and outgunned and wouldn't last very long so that's not a concern
 
I doubt those are insurrections.

Are these words insurrections?

...
"We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore," he said.

they're out there fighting. The House guys are fighting. But it's, it's incredible.

And you have to get your people to fight. And if they don't fight, we have to primary the hell out of the ones that don't fight.

And we're going to have to fight much harder.

It was going to be great and now we're out here fighting

I'd fight. So I'd fight, they'd fight, I'd fight, they'd fight. Pop pop.

And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore.

Thank you, for adding more to my list.

@stealthycat when are you going to answer my questions?

So what makes you think these people (in OP) are talking about actual violence or insurrection? Was mango MAGAt magnet?

They're a logical counterargument to your OP.
 
good post

so Trump did NOT incite riots/insurrection in your opinion ? I don't think so either

the only problem I have with Democrats quotes right now is them circumventing Fed laws. That's illegal. If they want to bring fights physically/violence they are terribly outmanned and outgunned and wouldn't last very long so that's not a concern

Where is their speech anymore or less meaning physical violence than his on Jan 6? Explain.
 
Not what I said at all.

but it kinda is

unless you're saying you really want Democrats to do anything to get their way but you don't want Republican's to do the same ?

is that it ?
 
Thank you, for adding more to my list.

@stealthycat when are you going to answer my questions?

So what makes you think these people (in OP) are talking about actual violence or insurrection? Was mango MAGAt magnet?

They're a logical counterargument to your OP.

I don't know how to address weird baby like talk , sorry
 
Where is their speech anymore or less meaning physical violence than his on Jan 6? Explain.

you explain and you tell me what you think

I'm guessing you've said often Trump incited riots - do I need to go back and search/look to find it ? If you did ... then you have to in good conscious call Democrats here the very same


me? I never said Trump incited riots. And here? I voted no - I don't think violence/threats/stifling Fed Govt rules/laws is right thing to do

I'm consistent - are you ?
 
I don't know how to address weird baby like talk , sorry

Dont make excuses...why cant you address my questions? Are you afraid of admitting that mango MAGAt magnet did exactly the same on Jan 6?
 
Thank you, for adding more to my list.

@stealthycat when are you going to answer my questions?

So what makes you think these people (in OP) are talking about actual violence or insurrection? Was mango MAGAt magnet?

They're a logical counterargument to your OP.
I have an answer to that.

Because trump said less, and these same leftists keeps saying he called for the attacks on the capitol.
 
you explain and you tell me what you think

I'm guessing you've said often Trump incited riots - do I need to go back and search/look to find it ? If you did ... then you have to in good conscious call Democrats here the very same


me? I never said Trump incited riots. And here? I voted no - I don't think violence/threats/stifling Fed Govt rules/laws is right thing to do

I'm consistent - are you ?

I gave you a list of his quotes. Did you see it? Then another poster just provided more.

Please answer my question before asking more of yours...mine ⬇️ are a direct counterargument to your OP.

So what makes you think these people are talking about actual violence or insurrection? Was mango MAGAt magnet?
 
more and more Democrats are calling for violence/insurrection/upheaval .... do you support it ?




Maryland Democratic Rep. Kweisi Mfume
"This will be a congressional fight, a constitutional fight, a legal fight, and on days like this a street fight, yes we will stand," Mfume said.

California Rep. Robert Garcia said the Democratic Party now needs to "bring actual weapons" in the "fight for democracy."
"I think [Musk is] also harming the American public in an enormous way," Garcia said. "And what I think is really important and what the American public want is for us to bring actual weapons to this bar fight. This is an actual fight for democracy, for the future of this country."

In January, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., also called for Democrats to fight Trump’s agenda "in the streets."
"That's not acceptable. We are going to fight it legislatively. We are going to fight it in the courts. We're going to fight it in the streets."

I call BS.

Show me a cite where Democrats are calling for “Second Amendment remedies”.

Democrats mean money, time, numbers when they say weapons. They mean influence and pressure. They aren’t talking ball bats, edged weapons and ballistics.
 
"Less?" He spoke for a long time and used the word "fight" 20 times. One guy. The OP is discussing multiple people.

Please explain "less"? And were his words significantly different than the ones in the OP? I listed a bunch of his Jan 6 quotes and another poster just posted more.
Yet it is the left who defined what those mean to them. now the left is using those words. We all know he was speaking figuratively, Everyone knew that. But the left states he was not. They he meant a real fight. Now the left is using the same words, and you expect people not to see there redefining of it?

Wow. Are you really that oblivious?

The left now owns those words in political speaking as actual fighting, so stop playing dumb.
 
Yet it is the left who defined what those mean to them. now the left is using those words. We all know he was speaking figuratively, Everyone knew that. But the left states he was not. They he meant a real fight. Now the left is using the same words, and you expect people not to see there redefining of it?

Wow. Are you really that oblivious?

The left now owns those words in political speaking as actual fighting, so stop playing dumb.

Please answer my questions ⬇️ first...I need the context and you just went off on a little lecture there that doesnt make sense without that context...if it would.

"Less?" He spoke for a long time and used the word "fight" 20 times. One guy. The OP is discussing multiple people.​
Please explain "less"? And were his words significantly different than the ones in the OP?
 
I gave you a list of his quotes. Did you see it? Then another poster just provided more.

Please answer my question before asking more of yours...mine ⬇️ are a direct counterargument to your OP.

So what makes you think these people are talking about actual violence or insurrection? Was mango MAGAt magnet?
I did answer

I swear there must be something wrong with your computer .... you never seem to see where anyone answers your questions - very odd

"me? I never said Trump incited riots. And here? I voted no - I don't think violence/threats/stifling Fed Govt rules/laws is right thing to do
I'm consistent - are you ?"
 
I did answer

I swear there must be something wrong with your computer .... you never seem to see where anyone answers your questions - very odd

"me? I never said Trump incited riots. And here? I voted no - I don't think violence/threats/stifling Fed Govt rules/laws is right thing to do
I'm consistent - are you ?"

OK so then you dont think that the people in your OP are talking about violence and insurrection against this administration? Yes or no? Because that's what I asked you.

I am questioning your OP which is the foundation of your poll options, before I can answer the poll, so I can answer the poll.

So what makes you think these people are talking about actual violence or insurrection? Was mango MAGAt magnet?
If you dont think they are, please just say so.
 
Most of the people you see on these protests are shrieking, screaming, cursing harpies and government employees who should have their ass at work.

THEY DO NOT REPRESENT EVERY DAY AMERICANS. They are simply poor losers. And yes, so were the people on Jan 6.
 
Then allow the teachers to carry who wish to. Problem solved. Schools being a no gun zone, is an open invitation to law breakers.

Yes, the universal problem for guns.

More guns.

Genius!
 
Most of the people you see on these protests are shrieking, screaming, cursing harpies and government employees who should have their ass at work.

THEY DO NOT REPRESENT EVERY DAY AMERICANS. They are simply poor losers. And yes, so were the people on Jan 6.

Firstly, people do have holidays and can use them however they like.

Secondly, they're still US citizens who have every right to state how they feel by peaceful protest.
Lastly how do they not represent every day Americans? They are simply people who got a job for the government, how are they not normal?
 
but it kinda is

unless you're saying you really want Democrats to do anything to get their way but you don't want Republican's to do the same ?

is that it ?
You have reading comprehension issues.
 
Curious. What do you think would happen if the agenda of Curtis Yarvin was enacted?
Wow.

I never heard that name before and had to look him up. I didn't get to what his agenda is, but Mencius Moldbug seems like a whack-job.
 
Back
Top Bottom