• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do you support cutting taxes, even if it increases the deficit?

Do you support cutting taxes, even if it increases the deficit and debt?


  • Total voters
    61
Cutting taxes does not increase the debt.
Good frigging grief. But the best part is watching you deny that revenue cuts does not mean you would have to cut services. For a guy focused on spending, thats a hoot!
 
Here's a simple example that even an economic moron might understand:

Let's say someone, we'll call them G, is working for $100 day, and has current expenses of $90/day for food, housing, insurance, car payment, etc. and $35/day of that is debt service for mortgage, car payments and credit cards. G decides to retire, and is only going to take home $50/day. That is called a "deficit". G's expenses are now $40/day more than his revenues, $35 of which is just debt service. According to one of our financial geniuses, loss of income doesn't create debt. Of course, G could take out a loan to cover existing expenses, but because of diminished revenues, that loan is going to be very expensive, if one is even available. Or, G could stop eating, live on the street, or default on the loan and try to avoid the loan sharks and debt collectors, just to be "responsible" with their money.
 
Hasn't DOGE show EVERY AMERICANS that we don't have a Taxing Problem, but CRIMINALS are pissing away our Tax $'s and getting the greedy poor majorities to vote to financially oppress hard working Americans so the CRIMINALS stealing our money can get more money ????......

The gaslighted people on the left need to END the DNC and start over ! Until that happens the DNC will keep screwing you over and continue to destroy America !

Just like they DID NOT LET DEM voters pick Sanders (See why Diddie Wasserman Schultz quit)!
Just like they did not let DEM voters Pick bidens replacement!
Just like they are trying to get DOGE to stop uncovering all their Fraud , waste and crimes!
 
The debt doesn't happen until you actually spend more than you take in. I can plan to knock over a liquor store all day long, but I haven't robbed the liquor store until I've robbed the liquor store.
LOL. Passing tax cuts absolutely assures that the liquor store will be robbed!
 
According to the polls, 60% of Americans support cutting taxes, even if it means higher deficit. 74% of Republicans support this. 55% of Democrats oppose cutting taxes, even if it means higher deficit. Back in 1996, only 23% of Americans supported lowering taxes, if it means higher debt.

You can watch Harry Enten's analysis below:



How about you? Do you support deficit inducing tax cuts?

The premise of the question is wrong. Spending causes deficits.
 
Hasn't DOGE show EVERY AMERICANS that we don't have a Taxing Problem, but CRIMINALS are pissing away our Tax $'s and getting the greedy poor majorities to vote to financially oppress hard working Americans so the CRIMINALS stealing our money can get more money ????......

The gaslighted people on the left need to END the DNC and start over ! Until that happens the DNC will keep screwing you over and continue to destroy America !

Just like they DID NOT LET DEM voters pick Sanders (See why Diddie Wasserman Schultz quit)!
Just like they did not let DEM voters Pick bidens replacement!
Just like they are trying to get DOGE to stop uncovering all their Fraud , waste and crimes!

Same old drivel about waste, fraud and abuse without ever showing any significant examples.
 
The premise of the question is wrong. Spending causes deficits.
No. Taking in less revenue than the following years budget calls for causes deficits. Republicans slash revenues and then outspend Dems. It’s total fiscal incompetence.
 
The debt doesn't happen until you actually spend more than you take in. I can plan to knock over a liquor store all day long, but I haven't robbed the liquor store until I've robbed the liquor store.
Bottom line is that rational people make decisions based on information. Anyone who voted for Trump was voting for more debt.
 
No. Taking in less revenue than the following years budget calls for causes deficits. Republicans slash revenues and then outspend Dems. It’s total fiscal incompetence.
The tax cut is a permanent extention of one already in place. The salt tax exemption is a nod to blue state Republicans. New tax breaks are for tips and overtime and interest deduction on new American made vehicles. These new do not nearly account for the 2 trillion expected. The dirty secret is that if we allow the 2017 tax cuts expire tax revenue would go down along with the economy. A 1.5 increase in the GDP nor the 700 billion in tariff revenue isn't considered by CBO.
Still a lot of fat that should be cut.
 
No. Taking in less revenue than the following years budget calls for causes deficits. Republicans slash revenues and then outspend Dems. It’s total fiscal incompetence.
These people don’t seem to understand how the equation Debt = Expenses minus Revenue works. In this equation changes in either revenue or expenses have an equal impact on debt. It’s total math incompetence.
 
The tax cut is a permanent extention of one already in place.
With additional cuts.
The salt tax exemption is a nod to blue state Republicans. New tax breaks are for tips and overtime and interest deduction on new American made vehicles. These new do not nearly account for the 2 trillion expected.
Of course they do. Not all of it, as the remainder is for out of control spending republicans love adding.
The dirty secret is that if we allow the 2017 tax cuts expire tax revenue would go down along with the economy.
lol, no.
A 1.5 increase in the GDP nor the 700 billion in tariff revenue isn't considered by CBO.
Still a lot of fat that should be cut.
Tax rates need moved back to pre Reagan cuts on the top 10%. Military spending needs cut in half.
 
Nope directly addressing the post to which I responded and the actual results of when the Reps cut tax rates. Care to respond?
The actually result of tax cuts is they add to the federal revenue...the problem is both parties when flush with federal money tend to spend it.
 
Cutting taxes does not increase the debt. Spending beyond revenues is what increases the debt, in all cases.

Hi Adams,

No.

It is a balanced system where there is revenue and expenditures. If you decrease revenue without compensating the loss of income elsewhere, than the cutting the taxes is the single sole reason why the debt went up. It's like saying that all cars that are parked must have ran out of fuel, conveniently ignoring the fact that you also need an engine and a driver to get the darn thing moving.

Just because 'Spending beyond revenues is what increases the debt, in all cases' is a little bit true, that does not mean that 'Cutting taxes does not increase the debt' is therefore also true. And it obviously is not.

Joey
 
The actually result of tax cuts is they add to the federal revenue...the problem is both parties when flush with federal money tend to spend it.
Tax cuts do not add to revenue. It’s a mathematical impossibility to do so.
 
Tax cuts do not add to revenue. It’s a mathematical impossibility to do so.
As has been demonstrated by decades of data. The "theory" was disproved, as was the vaunted Reagan "miracle" which was, in fact, a mirage, promulgated and promoted by economic charlatans. In short, a fraud. Reagan nearly collapsed the economy in the process. Trump is determined to finish that foolish destruction.
 
The tax cut is a permanent extention of one already in place. The salt tax exemption is a nod to blue state Republicans. New tax breaks are for tips and overtime and interest deduction on new American made vehicles. These new do not nearly account for the 2 trillion expected. The dirty secret is that if we allow the 2017 tax cuts expire tax revenue would go down along with the economy.
The reason it’s a dirty little secret is that it’s not true. Republican politicians will tell you it’s true, but it’s not. They will pass a tax cut then revenue will go up and they will say “look see it went up.” The truth is that unless we have a major recession revenue almost always goes up due to normal growth, inflation and population increases (due to immigration). Economists pick this apart and study after study show that tax reductions do not pay for themselves. Tax reductions decrease revenue tax increases increase it.

A 1.5 increase in the GDP
The CBO estimates any growth that would be expected. I don’t know where you got 1.5%.

nor the 700 billion in tariff revenue isn't considered by CBO.
Tariff revenue is not in the bill therefore it’s not estimated. No one has any idea whatsoever how much the tariff revenue will be. All we know is that it’s a new tax targeting the poor and middle classes.

Still a lot of fat that should be cut.
Republicans will only cut from programs they don’t like. For example “defense” doesn’t get cut, it gets an extra $150 billion.
 
The reason it’s a dirty little secret is that it’s not true. Republican politicians will tell you it’s true, but it’s not. They will pass a tax cut then revenue will go up and they will say “look see it went up.” The truth is that unless we have a major recession revenue almost always goes up due to normal growth, inflation and population increases (due to immigration). Economists pick this apart and study after study show that tax reductions do not pay for themselves. Tax reductions decrease revenue tax increases increase it.


The CBO estimates any growth that would be expected. I don’t know where you got 1.5%.


Tariff revenue is not in the bill therefore it’s not estimated. No one has any idea whatsoever how much the tariff revenue will be. All we know is that it’s a new tax targeting the poor and middle classes.


Republicans will only cut from programs they don’t like. For example “defense” doesn’t get cut, it gets an extra $150 billion.
I believe Obama called that anemic growth the new normal.
 
I believe Obama called that anemic growth the new normal.
And it was, until post pandemic when all the lent up demand kicked in.
 
I believe Obama called that anemic growth the new normal.
?
Obama 2.3%
Trump 2.3%
Biden 3.2%
Trump second term so far -0.3%
So far Trump has certainly slammed the brakes on growth.
 
If you decrease revenue without compensating the loss of income elsewhere, than the cutting the taxes is the single sole reason why the debt went up.
No. Decreases in revenue must be compensated for by reductions in spending. If revenue decreases, but spending is not adjusted, the debt is caused by the failure to adjust spending, not the revenue reduction. Why? Because the debt hasn't happened until the money is spent.
 
Cutting taxes does not increase the debt.

Good frigging grief. But the best part is watching you deny that revenue cuts does not mean you would have to cut services. For a guy focused on spending, thats a hoot!

Please, cite it.

Or admit you're lying.
Anyone can look at page 1 & 2. You were bothered that you were asked what services you wanted cut as a result of lower revenue.

Again, it is absurd that you argue cutting taxes does not cause lower revenue, of course it does if you hold all other things constant. If you have lower revenue then you have to cut services if you don't want higher debt.....AND YOU DO NOT WANT HIGER DEBT, so of course YOU would have to cut services........WHICH IS WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN ARGUING. But you were upset that anyone asked what you wanted to cut.....its all so self-contradictory.
The game neocons used with supply-side ideology was to use the laffer curve and falsely claim the low rates would cause greater GDP and revenue. It doesn't, the correlation is the other way around slightly.

If you can't argue with some modicum of intellectual integrity, you end up posting hypocritical nonsense.
 
No. Decreases in revenue must be compensated for by reductions in spending.
There is no must involved. Republicans reduce revenue and actually increase spending on a regular basis.

If revenue decreases, but spending is not adjusted, the debt is caused by the failure to adjust spending, not the revenue reduction. Why? Because the debt hasn't happened until the money is spent.
Sorry but that makes no sense. You are twisting yourself into a pretzel trying to prove something no one will believe.

If only one action was taken and the debt goes up then that action caused the debt to go up.

Debt = Expenses - Revenue

Changing either or both can make the debt go up or down. It's simple math.
 
No. Decreases in revenue must be compensated for by reductions in spending.
And this was the point I made, thats exactly what I said YOU said.
If revenue decreases, but spending is not adjusted, the debt is caused by the failure to adjust spending, not the revenue reduction. Why? Because the debt hasn't happened until the money is spent.
LOL....the lower tax rate caused the lower revenue to begin with, you leave that part out.
 
Back
Top Bottom