Obviously a huge hypothetical as we are not ready for a world government yet, but in the future if all nations have become democratic in nature would you support the United Nations of Earth so to speak? Could each nation work as a state and have different nations rights like we have state rights? The only problem is there would be no one to trade with so ultimately we would have to work to keep the nation alive trading among each other. Honestly I don't even know if capitalism would work for a world government since there would be no competition. There's a ton of things to considerand I personally think because of human nature a world government in even 200 years isn't possible. But as a hypothetical would you support such a idea?
This would certainly help to equalize conditions throughout the world. With the world government taxing authority, it would be easy to get the richer countries to contribute more to help the poorer counties.
.
This would certainly help to equalize conditions throughout the world. With the world government taxing authority, it would be easy to get the richer countries to contribute more to help the poorer counties.
.
But if there was a world government, don't you think it would have taxing authority? Then you would be obligated to pay your taxes.We are under no obligation to pay for poor countries nor is the wealth of the rich countries something that poor countries are entitled to. How many of them are poor because of dictatorships or oppressive governments?
Obviously a huge hypothetical as we are not ready for a world government yet, but in the future if all nations have become democratic in nature would you support the United Nations of Earth so to speak? Could each nation work as a state and have different nations rights like we have state rights? The only problem is there would be no one to trade with so ultimately we would have to work to keep the nation alive trading among each other. Honestly I don't even know if capitalism would work for a world government since there would be no competition. There's a ton of things to considerand I personally think because of human nature a world government in even 200 years isn't possible. But as a hypothetical would you support such a idea?
States don't have Tenth Amendment rights as it stands. So you're saying I would then be 1 vote out of 7 billion instead of 300 million? I would have even LESS individual sovereignty than I have now?Obviously a huge hypothetical as we are not ready for a world government yet, but in the future if all nations have become democratic in nature would you support the United Nations of Earth so to speak? Could each nation work as a state and have different nations rights like we have state rights? The only problem is there would be no one to trade with so ultimately we would have to work to keep the nation alive trading among each other. Honestly I don't even know if capitalism would work for a world government since there would be no competition. There's a ton of things to considerand I personally think because of human nature a world government in even 200 years isn't possible. But as a hypothetical would you support such a idea?
And who enforces your world wide directives?It is better to have smaller localised government, decision making bodies, and then a world wide directive on human rights, environmental and labour standard. We are working towards that, standards are converging, but it will take centuries for it to happen assuming we don't fall into WWIII first.
And who enforces your world wide directives?
.
Yeah, sanctions have such a great record I'm sure that will work. :roll:The court that's charged with it, using sanctions and other forms of economic punishments with the cooperation of complaint countries.
On what authority does your court get charged with juridiction?The court that's charged with it, using sanctions and other forms of economic punishments with the cooperation of complaint countries.
Yeah, sanctions have such a great record I'm sure that will work. :roll:
.
On what authority does your court get charged with juridiction?
You do realize that the only reason a court is able to enforce anything is because there are guns to back it up.
.
Obviously a huge hypothetical as we are not ready for a world government yet, but in the future if all nations have become democratic in nature would you support the United Nations of Earth so to speak? Could each nation work as a state and have different nations rights like we have state rights? The only problem is there would be no one to trade with so ultimately we would have to work to keep the nation alive trading among each other. Honestly I don't even know if capitalism would work for a world government since there would be no competition. There's a ton of things to considerand I personally think because of human nature a world government in even 200 years isn't possible. But as a hypothetical would you support such a idea?
So basically you are suggesting the UN or a simlilar organization would enforce your sanctions. Good luck on that. :crazy3:Sure, it will work in certain instances, and in other there will be needs for other economic punishments.
Society, people, government. The same authority that gives any court the power it has.
Or the threat of guns, that's what the cooperative countries are for.
Do you support a World Government?
Do you support a world government?
I support a "world judge" and btw very strictly limited in deed. The purpose to not kill each other off. Not government in the traditional sense.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?