• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do you know what terrible thing Kimmel said about Charlie Kirk that got him fired?

W

WisconIndependent

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Messages
2,306
Reaction score
2,997
Gender
Male
I have heard the right wing saying that Kimmel said a terrible thing about Kirk and it got him fired, so what was it that Kimmel said about Kirk. Here goes
"The MAGA Gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it."Charil
I guess I miss the point of saying something terrible about Charlie Kirk as it says nothing bad about Kirk, only the truth about the MAGAs trying to score political points with Kirk's murder. This comes down to Trump and his cronies using this as an excuse to get another comedian who makes fun of Trump and his MAGAs off the air by threatening the stations and the network to lose their licensee's if they fail to fire Kimmel. They are calling this hate speech, which as you can see it was not. If you want hate speech, listen to Stephen Miller or even Trump.
 
WisconIndependent said:
I have heard the right wing saying that Kimmel said a terrible thing about Kirk and it got him fired, so what was it that Kimmel said about Kirk. Here goes
"The MAGA Gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them
Click to expand...
So what are you trying to say? That Kimmel was fired for being a moron?
WisconIndependent said:
and doing everything they can to score political points from it."Charil
I guess I miss the point of saying something terrible about Charlie Kirk as it says nothing bad about Kirk, only the truth about the MAGAs trying to score political points with Kirk's murder. This comes down to Trump and his cronies using this as an excuse to get another comedian who makes fun of Trump and his MAGAs off the air by threatening the stations and the network to lose their licensee's if they fail to fire Kimmel. They are calling this hate speech,
Click to expand...
Who is this they? ABC?
WisconIndependent said:
which as you can see it was not. If you want hate speech, listen to Stephen Miller or even Trump.
Click to expand...
 
Who actually watches ABC?

Maybe back in 1998

They are still a network ?
 
WisconIndependent said:
This comes down to Trump and his cronies using this as an excuse to get another comedian who makes fun of Trump and his MAGAs off the air by threatening the stations and the network to lose their licensee's if they fail to fire Kimmel.
Click to expand...

Exactly. This is why people like me have been arguing against the idea of government licensing since forever. Note that even after this, people like you will still support state licensing "for the common good".

WisconIndependent said:
They are calling this hate speech, which as you can see it was not. If you want hate speech, listen to Stephen Miller or even Trump.
Click to expand...

They've taken the nonsense term "hate speech", another moronic left-wing invention, and are now using it against their political opponents.
 
aociswundumho said:
They've taken the nonsense term "hate speech", another moronic left-wing invention, and are now using it against their political opponents.
Click to expand...

Yes, because calling black people “n-gger” is the exact same thing as threatening to shut down news media and firing comedians unless they speak as desired by government.
 
Right wing cancel culture in full swing.

Actually, I think it may not matter. These guys, Kimmel and Colbert, are way too hot to just stick on the shelf. They are going to have new gigs in some form and it's likely they will be less restricted in what they say than previously. They may go to another network, or simply do something online. I could easily see them producing UTube videos. The internet is basically wide open for anything they want to do.

For now, anyway. We can't put it past Trump to try to control that somehow.
 
ataraxia said:
Yes, because calling black people “n-gger” is the exact same thing as threatening to shut down news media and firing comedians unless they speak as desired by government.
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter, because the idiotic term "hate speech" is entirely subjective.
 
WisconIndependent said:
I have heard the right wing saying that Kimmel said a terrible thing about Kirk and it got him fired, so what was it that Kimmel said about Kirk. Here goes
"The MAGA Gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it."Charil
I guess I miss the point of saying something terrible about Charlie Kirk as it says nothing bad about Kirk, only the truth about the MAGAs trying to score political points with Kirk's murder. This comes down to Trump and his cronies using this as an excuse to get another comedian who makes fun of Trump and his MAGAs off the air by threatening the stations and the network to lose their licensee's if they fail to fire Kimmel. They are calling this hate speech, which as you can see it was not. If you want hate speech, listen to Stephen Miller or even Trump.
Click to expand...
One word, scary how our government is taking over every aspect of our life.
 
Kimmel said about Kirk? Nothing. He went after MAGAs and Trump himself, which is what got the threat to ABC, and consequently Kimmel booted.

This is entirely about Trump's fragile ego, then resorting to fascism to silence opposition using the threat of government and/or lawsuits.
 
WisconIndependent said:
I guess I miss the point of saying something terrible about Charlie Kirk as it says nothing bad about Kirk....
Click to expand...
Kimmel didn't say anything bad about Kirk at all.

Authoritarians do not care about facts when they are attacking their rivals or trying to seize power.
 
Peacenik said:
Right wing cancel culture in full swing.

Actually, I think it may not matter. These guys, Kimmel and Colbert, are way too hot to just stick on the shelf. They are going to have new gigs in some form and it's likely they will be less restricted in what they say than previously. They may go to another network, or simply do something online. I could easily see them producing UTube videos. The internet is basically wide open for anything they want to do.

For now, anyway. We can't put it past Trump to try to control that somehow.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it's not an end to their careers, it's just cable TV becoming more unwatchable.
 
aociswundumho said:
That it's not subjective.
Click to expand...

Sure it is. Evil is only guaged from the perspective of someone depending on perceived or actual danger or harm to them.

From the standpoint of the lamb, a wolf is evil because it eats them alive. From the standpoint of a wolf, eating a lamb is not evil, it's survival. So who is objectively right?

Muslims think women not covering their hair is evil because it leads to a licentious and disordered society- a perceived harm. Some pacific islanders, on the other hand, are nudists and don't understand why anyone even wears clothes. Westerners fall somewhere in the middle- and think it's OK for women to show their hair, but not their chest or groin area, because that would be indecent and immodest. So who is objectively right, and who is objectively evil?
 
Cosmo said:
So what are you trying to say? That Kimmel was fired for being a moron?

Who is this they? ABC?
Click to expand...
He was fired because the Federal government punished him for what is objectively protected speech.
 
WisconIndependent said:
I have heard the right wing saying that Kimmel said a terrible thing about Kirk and it got him fired, so what was it that Kimmel said about Kirk. Here goes
"The MAGA Gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it."Charil
I guess I miss the point of saying something terrible about Charlie Kirk as it says nothing bad about Kirk, only the truth about the MAGAs trying to score political points with Kirk's murder. This comes down to Trump and his cronies using this as an excuse to get another comedian who makes fun of Trump and his MAGAs off the air by threatening the stations and the network to lose their licensee's if they fail to fire Kimmel. They are calling this hate speech, which as you can see it was not. If you want hate speech, listen to Stephen Miller or even Trump.
Click to expand...
You should ask ABC.
 
aociswundumho said:
They've taken the nonsense term "hate speech", another moronic left-wing invention, and are now using it against their political opponents.
Click to expand...
So you approve of the government punishing Jimmy Kimmel for what is objectively protected speech. Got it. Putting you on the "anti first amendment" list.
 
aociswundumho said:
Exactly. This is why people like me have been arguing against the idea of government licensing since forever. Note that even after this, people like you will still support state licensing "for the common good".



They've taken the nonsense term "hate speech", another moronic left-wing invention, and are now using it against their political opponents.
Click to expand...
Were you against Biden & Co being in close contact with media and social media, pointing out what they claimed was "misinformation", based on their opinion of what misinformation was?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom