- Joined
- Jan 16, 2025
- Messages
- 2,951
- Reaction score
- 4,529
- Gender
- Female
No.I am okay with its use on anything other than official government business. The damn things are intended merely to sign a large quantity of souvenir autographs, not official business. I condemn the use of autopen for any legal documents. Are we clear?
No, the Constitition gives Congress the primary responsibility for curbing the President’s abuse of power. Democrats have filed more lawsuits against the Trump administration than all other Presidencies combined. It's not because previous Presidential opponents were stupid, they recognized the Constitution specified Congress as the place for policy debates to be settled.So a president should be able to interpret the law any way he wants. Huh.
Anyone who disagrees with Democrat talking points is a right wing extremist. The sheer volume of Democrat lawsuits debunks this claim.That may be clear to to right wing extremists, but not in reality.
Denial of the Biden regime's role in the KGB style campaign against its leading political opponent doesn't make it go away. Do some research on Matthew Colangelo's role in the lawfare campaign for a start.There is none.
I argue that the three branches are not coequal in power.How the Myth of the Coequal Branches Became the Norm
The Constitution is not a system of coequal branches. Congress is the dominant branch of our government. How, then, did this idea become so embedded in our national consciousness?www.aei.org
Democrats have filed a tsunami of lawsuits asking for selected judges to second guess the President instead of trying to work through Congress. They wouldn't do that if they thought they could get their way in Congress.??? Not what I said at all.
I don't like it when bitter, deadender Democrats try to use the courts to overturn the election.I get that you don’t like it when the judicial system doesn’t lie down for trump.
I will support your opponent in an upcoming election is a threat that inspires fearful compliance? I hope so, that's how politicians are held accountable. It's something repeated by both sides of the aisle. There is nothing nefarious about it.Demonstrably true. See trump’s clear threats of “you will be primaried” if you don’t play along with me. Witness the various flip flops of Rubio and Graham and many others who lambasted trump and now praise him faithfully. Please.
See above.What examples?
Another playground taunt. Is that the best you can do?You only see a bubble outside of your own. That one is apparently invisible to you. Look closer.
You have officially jumped the shark.Democrats should be allowed to issue Pardons but not Republicans.
Democrats should be allowed to issue Pardons but not Republicans.
No, the Constitition gives Congress the primary responsibility for curbing the President’s abuse of power. Democrats have filed more lawsuits against the Trump administration than all other Presidencies combined. It's not because previous Presidential opponents were stupid, they recognized the Constitution specified Congress as the place for policy debates to be settled.
Anyone who disagrees with Democrat talking points is a right wing extremist. The sheer volume of Democrat lawsuits debunks this claim.
Denial of the Biden regime's role in the KGB style campaign against its leading political opponent doesn't make it go away. Do some research on Matthew Colangelo's role in the lawfare campaign for a start.
I argue that the three branches are not coequal in power.
Democrats have filed a tsunami of lawsuits asking for selected judges to second guess the President instead of trying to work through Congress. They wouldn't do that if they thought they could get their way in Congress.
I don't like it when bitter, deadender Democrats try to use the courts to overturn the election.
I will support your opponent in an upcoming election is a threat that inspires fearful compliance? I hope so, that's how politicians are held accountable. It's something repeated by both sides of the aisle. There is nothing nefarious about it.
As for primary opponents and critics turning into supporters, it happens frequently as positions evolve. For example, Kamala strongly implied Joe Biden was racist for his opposition to busing. But VP Harris told a different story. Was that fear? Certainly not.
See above.
Another playground taunt. Is that the best you can do?
Absolutely. And Trump has not signed any of them with autopen.No.
Do you consider Presidential pardons legal documents?
And how do you know this? Links please.Absolutely. And Trump has not signed any of them with autopen.
Since I do not suffer from TDS, I will take him at his word. And there is no need for him to sign legal documents with autopen. He makes a public show of signing them.And how do you know this? Links please.
So, you have access to a quote from Trump that says he signed all 1500+ pardons manually. Will you link that please?Since I do not suffer from TDS, I will take him at his word. And there is no need for him to sign legal documents with autopen. He makes a public show of signing them.
Silly librul! Trump did not sign 1500 pardons individually. No need to. However, he did sign pardon documents that combined all the J6 individuals. Do you really think 1500 individual documents are required?So, you have access to a quote from Trump that says he signed all 1500+ pardons manually. Will you link that please?
LOL, you gettin dizzy from all that spin? Have a good one!Silly librul! Trump did not sign 1500 pardons individually. No need to. However, he did sign pardon documents that combined all the J6 individuals. Do you really think 1500 individual documents are required?
But then you are the one spinning. You take care now.LOL, you gettin dizzy from all that spin? Have a good one?
One more question. How do you think the courts and the prison system were supposed to know which people were granted clemency by Trump?But then you are the one spinning. You take care now.
/sarcasmSilly librul! Trump did not sign 1500 pardons individually. No need to. However, he did sign pardon documents that combined all the J6 individuals. Do you really think 1500 individual documents are required?
Tell it to the ghost of Jimmy Carter who pardoned thousands of draft dodgers.well, if each pardon should stand on its own merits, then yes. 1500 pardon documents should be prepared.
I don't think it was a grassroots event. I think there was instigation behind the scenes having nothing to do with Trump. Having said that, I would have done pardons on a case-by-case basis. I would not have pardoned all 1500.imo, Trump should not have pardoned those involved in the Jan6 event.
They were largely extremists from far-right groups like Proud Boys and Q Anon. And the planning started at least two weeks in advance.I disagree with Trump that they have been treated badly, and they are patriots.
Jimmy is long gone. Trump is still messing things up.Tell it to the ghost of Jimmy Carter who pardoned thousands of draft dodgers.
case by case, I am ok with. imo, that is not what happened with the 1500.I don't think it was a grassroots event. I think there was instigation behind the scenes having nothing to do with Trump. Having said that, I would have done pardons on a case-by-case basis. I would not have pardoned all 1500.
pretty much agree.They were largely extremists from far-right groups like Proud Boys and Q Anon. And the planning started at least two weeks in advance.
Glad we agree on that. Too bad they aren't doing it currently.No, the Constitition gives Congress the primary responsibility for curbing the President’s abuse of power.
Because he is breaking the law in so many ways.Democrats have filed more lawsuits against the Trump administration than all other Presidencies combined.
You lost me on this one. But where in the Constitution does it say that, exactly?It's not because previous Presidential opponents were stupid, they recognized the Constitution specified Congress as the place for policy debates to be settled.
Do you think that's true? I don't.Anyone who disagrees with Democrat talking points is a right wing extremist.
The volume does no such thing.The sheer volume of Democrat lawsuits debunks this claim.
No thanks. I've heard these wild claims before.Denial of the Biden regime's role in the KGB style campaign against its leading political opponent doesn't make it go away. Do some research on Matthew Colangelo's role in the lawfare campaign for a start.
The three branches of government are designed to function as a system of checks and balances. Agree?I argue that the three branches are not coequal in power.
???Democrats have filed a tsunami of lawsuits asking for selected judges to second guess the President instead of trying to work through Congress. They wouldn't do that if they thought they could get their way in Congress.
The only attempted overturn of an election I am aware of is the trump big lie, subsequent insurrection, and the various criminal efforts around access to voter machines.I don't like it when bitter, deadender Democrats try to use the courts to overturn the election.
When you have the richest man in the world in your pocket - essentially unlimited funds - it a threat to play along - like blackmail.I will support your opponent in an upcoming election is a threat that inspires fearful compliance? I hope so, that's how politicians are held accountable. It's something repeated by both sides of the aisle. There is nothing nefarious about it.
Matter of opinion. Personally, I am delighted that a populist conservative is taking on the establishment in both parties. I have had it with status quo.Jimmy is long gone. Trump is still messing things up.
It was Trump's original stated intention. he may have then looked at it based on how politicized the prosecutions became, how many were over charged or over sentenced. I still would have gone case by case, with all of that in mind, even if it took months.case by case, I am ok with. imo, that is not what happened with the 1500.
Judges are also required to assess the legal aspects of the case such as standing. You remember standing, don't you? It was the Biden election fraudsters best friend for suppressing lawsuits threatening to expose their 2020 election theft. Nonetheless DC district judge Boasberg eagerly vented his personal animus against the Trump administration in the case of 5 illegals held in detention in Texas, unquestionably outside his district. If he can't interpret a simple map why should he be trusted to interpret the Constitution? No reason.A Judge is supposed to make decisions based upon first the Constitution. Second, the Laws which must be in compliance with the Constitution. That is literally their job.
Let's ignore the violent reaction to the Dobbs decision where Democrat approved thugs including an armed would be assassin besieged Justices homes terrorizing their families. Of course that's minor compared to criticizing District judges for behaving like petty tyrants.The same people denouncing Judges and Courts now were the same ones cheering when the Courts determined that Joe Biden couldn’t pay of Student Loans by reappropriating money from one congressional purpose to another. They’re the same ones who cheer when a court strikes down a State law that runs afoul of the Second Amendment. There is no claims of Judicial Overreach then. Nobody was screaming will of the voters should be first and foremost.
Hyperbolic rhetoric with nothing behind it.The problem is that the RW has completely abandoned the Principles that got them into the mainstream in the first place. I even agreed with some of them. The Right is not just off the Rails. You can’t see the rails from where you are demanding that we go even further.
Now you resort to playground taunts. Kindly point out where the Right has launched a tsunami of 200+ lawsuits and growing, usurping Congress in favor of appointed judges acting as a super legislature.You have become that which you accused the Left of being.
That never happened.Any objection to the Democrats rampant abuse of the judiciary as a super legislature by decree is characterized as usurping the rule of law.
There was no such Democratic "blind faith" via "textbook" or not.That is textbook blind faith.
Can't rightfully discuss the non existence of something made in a false accusation.Can't discuss the issue of mandatory blind faith in judicial rule by decree
KING MAGAT aka President Donald Trump is a bad president just as he is undeniably a bad human being. Yes, he has proven that he tries to paint his face in an orange tone, for some unfathomable reason.so it's off to an Orange Man Bad rant.
Denials, demagoguery and unsupported opinions from you are not discussionThat never happened.
So there is that.
There was no such Democratic "blind faith" via "textbook" or not.
So there is that.
Can't rightfully discuss the non existence of something made in a false accusation.
So there is that.
KING MAGAT aka President Donald Trump is a bad president just as he is undeniably a bad human being. Yes, he has proven that he tries to paint his face in an orange tone, for some unfathomable reason.
Rant?
There is nothing wild, nor mindless, nor bombastic, nor false about my impassioned posts about Trump. Well, there might be some exaggerated condemnations or jesting or the making of a few good japes in what I post. But when I post facts and figures etc. you know, serious rhetoric it is not ranting, it is legitimate voice of legitimate concerns.
So there is that.
You might have a salient point if I had, which I most certainly have not, actually engaged in what has been falsely accused in that comment.Denials, demagoguery and unsupported opinions from you are not discussion
Yes, there is that, the falsity of your accusatory post above compared to the truth of what I have been posting all along.So there is that.
Biden used his final weeks as commander-in-chief to grant clemency and pardon more than 1,500 individuals.Trump has granted clemency to over 1500 people, he's been in office for 4 months. Who else comes close?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?