- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 34,951
- Reaction score
- 16,311
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Simple question: Do You Approve of the GOP's Lawsuit Against Obama?
But executive orders are completely legal and constitutional.other
in some ways yes....i am hoping that this president, and future ones get spanked by judges for exceeding their authority when using executive orders
But executive orders are completely legal and constitutional.
But executive orders are completely legal and constitutional.
I'm not even sure what the point of the suit is. What relief are they seeking? I'm sure it's not money damages. Are they trying to get a court to invalidate the EO's? Didn't congress pass legislation to do the exact same thing as the orders shortly after the president signed them? Pretty much the only objective it seems the suit has is to be another way for Republicans to demonstrate how much they hate the president.
But executive orders are completely legal and constitutional.
The lawsuit is meant to make a statement.
It's nothing but partisan politics as usual. If Obama were Republican, he'd be the savoir of the party. Just look at Bush. Essentially the same exact positions, but since he had an (R) next to his name he was a hero to the party. Now that we have a Democrat Bush, he's suddenly the arbitrator of everything that is evil in the world. He's a marxist, a fascist, a neo-nazi, a muslim, and a communist all rolled up into one. And, he's a hero to everyone that hated Bush.
Hence why I hate political parties with a passion.
Simple question: Do You Approve of the GOP's Lawsuit Against Obama?
Quick question, when was the last time Democrats initiated impeachment proceedings against a Republican?I almost want to agree with the lawsuit because I don't like the abuse of power being shown by the President. but the lawsuit is not to fix or better our broken political system. The purpose of this lawsuit is for r's to fight and annoy d's. Just like d's do to r's. Our political system is not being used to better our country; it is being used for power and wealth. This lawsuit is just another example of that.
to a point, yes they are
but when you exceed that point, you have usurped the power of the congress
heaven forbid that a republican goes into the white house next, and summarily ends ALL welfare as an executive order
you would have a ****fit....as would most people on the left side of aisle
he/she is overstepping their authority with such an executive order....it should never be allowed
i want ALL presidents reigned in....not just this one....but the next, and the one after that
let's actually follow the few rules we still do have under the constitution
And yet the rest of us have no trouble finding significant differences between their policies that have nothing to do with the letter next to their names. Maybe if you turned your passion away from hating parties, and examined the actual policy, you'd find important differences.
Not when they transcend the legal jurisdiction of the office. The President has specific powers laid out in the constitution and when he acts outside of those powers he is, indeed, violating the constitution.
But executive orders are completely legal and constitutional.
Simple question: Do You Approve of the GOP's Lawsuit Against Obama?
But executive orders are completely legal and constitutional.
Quick question, when was the last time Democrats initiated impeachment proceedings against a Republican?
Quick question, when was the last time Democrats initiated impeachment proceedings against a Republican?
What has he done that is unconstitutional and illegal? What executive orders? What is this "point"?