- Joined
- Jan 27, 2013
- Messages
- 28,824
- Reaction score
- 20,497
- Location
- Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
My suspicion would be that she used contraceptives because she was sexually active.
Now, how you and Rush Limbaugh spin that into frequent, random, indiscriminate, casual sex (which is to say, "promiscuous" sex) is beyond me.
You realize, I hope, that it's perfectly possible for a woman to have sex with a single partner, right?
And the fact that she's using contraceptives is in no way indicative of a promiscuous lifestyle?
Do you have a link?She spoke about herself, not being able to get free contraceptives under the Georgetown University Student Health Insurance Plan because the University that, being a Catholic institution, did not support contraception as a matter of religious doctrine, did not include them in their plans.
When she got rightly called out on it, she changed her story, conveniently.
My opinion as well as many people. Please note those cloture motions began in the beginning, so it has nothing to do with him being a capable President, which he is by the way. It has be documented that several Republicans met to take Obama down.
Robert Draper Book: GOP's Anti-Obama Campaign Started Night Of Inauguration
Your premise is astoundingly asinine... and not even worthy of comment other than to point out how totally partisan and puerile it is - as if to suggest Democrats don't conspire at all, don't sit down in meeting after meeting to figure out how to oust ANY Republican, let alone that they never did it for Bush.Show me Democratic politicians conspiring to take down a president then you have something.
Do you have a link?
Uh oh, no link. You know that that means.I tried to get the video clip and/or transcripts of her presentation to the National Press Club in February 2012, however, they NPC has deleted any reference to it.
Uh oh, no link. You know that that means.
LOL - no, not that, just that now they are free to impugn your statement rather than have to fabricate something that impugns it.It means I've stooped to the level of my accusers?
Please show me where the Democrats have conspired to take down Republicans other than at the ballot box? Perhaps I'm naive, but I know of no time where the the present Democratic party tried this. Gee, when the Democrats felt that President Bush lied us into a war in Iraq, there was no effort to impeach him, yet the Republicans impeached President Clinton because he lied about a personal affair. And of course today we have some Republicans wanting to impeach President Obama because of his comments regarding Obamacare. Perhaps you're one of them? Basically, Republicans are authoritarians, the Democrats are not.Your premise is astoundingly asinine... and not even worthy of comment other than to point out how totally partisan and puerile it is - as if to suggest Democrats don't conspire at all, don't sit down in meeting after meeting to figure out how to oust ANY Republican, let alone that they never did it for Bush.
It doesn't even pass the laugh test, being so thoroughly and transparently disingenuous as it is.
:rofl - but I gotta give you kudos for the sheer audacity of the attempt. :applaud
And frankly (I know I'm going to regret this but...), what in the wide, wide world of sports is remotely wrong with Republicans "conspiring" to take down Obama? Seriously, what's wrong with that - especially since virtually EVERY Republican with an ounce of respect for this country has been doing it since his election?
Tell me, what's wrong with that? Does it hurt the liberal psyche somehow that people dare oppose them? What? Dare I ask, are you suggesting that opposition to Obama is somehow illegal? If so, this oughta be really, really good...
LOL - no, not that, just that now they are free to impugn your statement rather than have to fabricate something that impugns it.
Please show me where the Democrats have conspired to take down Republicans other than at the ballot box? Perhaps I'm naive, but I know of no time where the the present Democratic party tried this. Gee, when the Democrats felt that President Bush lied us into a war in Iraq, there was no effort to impeach him, yet the Republicans impeached President Clinton because he lied about a personal affair. And of course today we have some Republicans wanting to impeach President Obama because of his comments regarding Obamacare. Perhaps you're one of them? Basically, Republicans are authoritarians, the Democrats are not.
For some reason I thought the reason the U..S. Constitution broke the states into congressional districts and gave each state two Senators, was to serve the people and not political parties? Am I wrong with that notion?
And the cons are calling for Bashir's head on a platter, but if someone on Fox said it they'd be very quiet.
I've not experienced Ann Coulter being vile - perhaps you can enlighten me.
That is false. All equipment used and/or issued to the US military is made in the USA. It's Federal policy.Yeah, very true. Even our military is buying the boots they wear from China. Yep, that is another aspect to think about.
That is false. All equipment used and/or issued to the US military is made in the USA. It's Federal policy.
LOL - my sentiments exactly.You can't be serious. Dennis Kusinich made a run for the Democrat Presidential nomination on the basis of impeaching Bush. And Democrats tried to get the World Court to charge Bush with war and other crimes.
You really need to step away from the MoveOn website and take a breather occasionally.
:thinking <<< wondering how many Kool-Aid Koupons it takes to get their 'special hat' >>> :thinkingPlease show me where the Democrats have conspired to take down Republicans other than at the ballot box? Perhaps I'm naive, but I know of no time where the the present Democratic party tried this. Gee, when the Democrats felt that President Bush lied us into a war in Iraq, there was no effort to impeach him, yet the Republicans impeached President Clinton because he lied about a personal affair. And of course today we have some Republicans wanting to impeach President Obama because of his comments regarding Obamacare. Perhaps you're one of them? Basically, Republicans are authoritarians, the Democrats are not.
For some reason I thought the reason the U..S. Constitution broke the states into congressional districts and gave each state two Senators, was to serve the people and not political parties? Am I wrong with that notion?
Ann Coulter? Didn't s(he) go back to to being the lead dancer in 'Bro Kimbro's Lance in Yer Pants She-male Revue'? Bless her empty head. Do you remember her 'correcting' Bob McKeown on Canada sending troops to Viet Nam?
Multiple choice
1. He should have been fired.
2. He can shove the apology up his ass.
3. Neither 1 nor 2
4. I Don't care.
Fired. There should be a standard that applies to idiots on the left, as much as it applies to idiots on the right. Many, many idiots on the right have been fired for similarly outrageous or even less outrageous statements, as have others on the left.
What makes this guy any different?
He's not a white conservative?
There is a standard already, those people who hire have the right to fire. It's very simple, no legislation is required. Firing him would be seen as squelching free speech.Fired. There should be a standard that applies to idiots on the left, as much as it applies to idiots on the right. Many, many idiots on the right have been fired for similarly outrageous or even less outrageous statements, as have others on the left.
What makes this guy any different?
Glenn beck is white and wasn't fired, yet he called President Obama a racist and said he doesn't like white people.
There is a standard already, those people who hire have the right to fire. It's very simple, no legislation is required. Firing him would be seen as squelching free speech.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?