Do you actually care about the Epstein files?

[jaypatriot]

Why should the politically powerful or rich elites be protected?
Granted in many cases the statue of limitations, which can vary by state, on any sexual abuse charges may make it tough to criminally prosecute these individuals but their demented acts should be made public.
If that opens them up to civil law suits, destruction of their careers, and public disgrace it should be done.
Their victims deserve that much.

So you are in favor of launching a jihad against any unknown names in any unpublished list of names you don't know but would love to know if it results in Trump being embarrassed.
Good strategy. Attack Trump by clamoring for a list of names which may or may not further your jihad against Trump. What a dubious strategy.
But it's just one more way for you to attack Trump prior to next year's midterms.
You and the Dems need all the help you can get if you're going to play Wiley Coyote going after the Road Runner.

And, of course, you worry so much about "the victims" as if you really care of about women you don't even know who were lured to Epstein's island.
Why not worry about real people starving and dying in Sudan? You don't know them either. But if you did and that knowledge could be damaging to Trump, you'd be going after the people who perpetrated that human tragedy.
I understand that given the prurient interests of so many anti-Trumpers obsessed with salacious stories, it won't stop until you have fully exhausted all of the political weapons to be used chasing this lustful and lecherous quest.

 

[KingLeo]

So you are in favor of launching a jihad against any unknown names in any unpublished list of names you don't know but would love to know if it results in Trump being embarrassed.
Good strategy. Attack Trump by clamoring for a list of names which may or may not further your jihad against Trump. What a dubious strategy.
But it's just one more way for you to attack Trump prior to next year's midterms.
You and the Dems need all the help you can get if you're going to play Wiley Coyote going after the Road Runner.

And, of course, you worry so much about "the victims" as if you really care of about women you don't even know who were lured to Epstein's island.
Why not worry about real people starving and dying in Sudan? You don't know them either. But if you did and that knowledge could be damaging to Trump, you'd be going after the people who perpetrated that human tragedy.
I understand that given the prurient interests of so many anti-Trumpers obsessed with salacious stories, it won't stop until you have fully exhausted all of the political weapons to be used chasing this lustful and lecherous quest.

LOL
A 'jihad'?
The more you Trumpers play the poor victim card the less and less credibility you have.
This is about exposing people who committed sexual abuse crimes against MINORS and because they are high power political figures or ultra wealth elites they feel they should go unnoticed and unpunished.
Make any and all information in those Epstein files public and let the cards fall where they may.

 

[butterfly]

Absolutely.

But that leaves his clients, who deserve everything that happens to them.

It can't be said enough. It's the clients, stupid.

 

[Hamish Howl]

And the Progressives didn’t welcome him convention after convention ?

I am reasonably sure the progressives never welcomed any Clinton to anything, ever.

 

[Hamish Howl]

So you are in favor of launching a jihad against any unknown names in any unpublished list of names you don't know but would love to know if it results in Trump being embarrassed.

Yes.

You guys have been screaming about "groomers" for 10 years, but when there's actual pedos, you suddenly want to be prudent and reasonable?

 

[Felis Leo]

I am reasonably sure the progressives never welcomed any Clinton to anything, ever.

Seriously. The Clintons have been punching left since time immemorial. Now we are to pretend that the folks who were basically Bernie Sanders' supporters were ready to jump on hand grenades for the Clintons (especially Bill Clinton)?

 

[Felis Leo]

Who are The Progressives?

I am going to presume that @NatMorton is going to tell you that all Democratic politicians save some "reasonable" ones like Joe Manchin are progressives.

Liberal, Leftist, Democrat, Progressive, Democratic Socialist, Socialist. They are all synonyms to most Republicans.

 

[Hamish Howl]

I am going to presume that @NatMorton is going to tell you that all Democratic politicians save some "reasonable" ones like Joe Manchin are progressives.

Liberal, Leftist, Democrat, Progressive, Democratic Socialist, Socialist. They are all synonyms to most Republicans.

Who needs nuance?

 

[NatMorton]

Who are The Progressives?

The more liberal end of the Democratic party and DNC leadership, e.g., Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazile, Tom Perez, etc. They welcomed Bill, as did the entire convention audience every time he spoke.

 

[NatMorton]

I am going to presume that @NatMorton is going to tell you that all Democratic politicians save some "reasonable" ones like Joe Manchin are progressives.

Liberal, Leftist, Democrat, Progressive, Democratic Socialist, Socialist. They are all synonyms to most Republicans.

No, he's going to tell you the Democratic party, as whole, had no problem, year after year, lionizing a womanizer with a record of sexual harassment equal to Trump's. You're welcome to challenge that assertion, if you like.

 

[trixare4kids]

Count me as one of those who has never cared about the Epstein files and still doesn't. If there was anything in there that could have been used for political purposes it would have come out a long, long time ago. At this point it is all stupid conspiracy/partisan nonsense.

It's recycled scandal, and like you said, it no longer matters. Here's what it is now. The worst of the hateful election butt-hurts are using it, revisiting it because in some odd way they delusionally think they "got him now". Theirs is a prime example of Trump Derangement Syndrome in overdrive. These people are their own worst enemies.

 

[noonereal]

Count me as one of those who has never cared about the Epstein files and still doesn't.

Sadly, American does not care if it's president had sex with underage girls so what is the point of talking about it

I think we all know what likely was done.
I do wonder however why Bubba is not included in the talk.

 

[trixare4kids]

I don't care because I don't think they'd tell me anything I don't already know. A bunch of billionaires and politicians had sex with underage teenage girls? Nothing about that surprises me.

Well, I do care but what I care about more are those who are using this issue, lying about those they've already pronounced as guilty. (DJT) This comes from the Democrats or those who will have us believe they care about everyone's due process under the law.
I'm not sure who they think they are fooling.

 

[jaypatriot]

Yes.

You guys have been screaming about "groomers" for 10 years, but when there's actual pedos, you suddenly want to be prudent and reasonable?

ATTACK THE PEDOS! WE DON'T KNOW WHO THEY ARE OR WHAT THEY DID.
BUT IF THEY WENT TO EPSTEIN'S ISLAND THEN THEY MUST BE PEDOS.
WHY ELSE WOULD THEY BE THERE?

Pardon for the vigilante rant by the Epstein-obsessed anti-Trumpers.

 

[jaypatriot]

LOL
A 'jihad'?
The more you Trumpers play the poor victim card the less and less credibility you have.
This is about exposing people who committed sexual abuse crimes against MINORS and because they are high power political figures or ultra wealth elites they feel they should go unnoticed and unpunished.
Make any and all information in those Epstein files public and let the cards fall where they may.

And at the same time those anti-Trumpers with prurient interests in this salacious story about a human trafficker, can use their concern for young women they don't care about to hunger for more dirt on Trump to further their yes, jihad, against a sitting president.

 

[Hamish Howl]

ATTACK THE PEDOS! WE DON'T KNOW WHO THEY ARE OR WHAT THEY DID.
BUT IF THEY WENT TO EPSTEIN'S ISLAND THEN THEY MUST BE PEDOS.
WHY ELSE WOULD THEY BE THERE?

Pardon for the vigilante rant by the Epstein-obsessed anti-Trumpers.

Why else WOULD they be there?

 

[Felis Leo]

And at the same time those anti-Trumpers with prurient interests in this salacious story about a human trafficker, can use their concern for young women they don't care about to hunger for more dirt on Trump to further their yes, jihad, against a sitting president.

If the man is a sexual predator against children on top of being a sexual predator against adult women, why should anyone care about the motivations of the people who stand against him? Why would you, since you keep bringing up the alleged fact that you didn’t vote for him and are not a Trump supporter?

 

[jaypatriot]

Why else WOULD they be there?

Tennis? Business? Sun tans? Golf?
You've been to luxurious islands before, right?.

 

[Felis Leo]

ATTACK THE PEDOS! WE DON'T KNOW WHO THEY ARE OR WHAT THEY DID.
BUT IF THEY WENT TO EPSTEIN'S ISLAND THEN THEY MUST BE PEDOS.
WHY ELSE WOULD THEY BE THERE?

Pardon for the vigilante rant by the Epstein-obsessed anti-Trumpers.

You only have the right to presumption of innocence in a criminal prosecution where the state must prove its case against you beyond a reasonable doubt. But if you were shown to be a frequent visitor to a relatively secluded site where mass-child rapes took place, you do not have a right to the presumption of innocence in the court of public opinion.

 

[Hamish Howl]

Tennis? Business? Sun tans? Golf?
You've been to luxurious islands before, right?.

Not ones staffed with 13 year olds.

 

[Hamish Howl]

You only have the right to presumption of innocence in a criminal prosecution where the state must prove its case against you beyond a reasonable doubt. But if you were shown to be a frequent visitor to a relatively secluded site where mass-child rapes took place, you do not have a right to the presumption of innocence in the court of public opinion.

We are supposed to overlook this for Chomo Orange Jesus.

 

[Felis Leo]

We are supposed to overlook this for Chomo Orange Jesus.

He’s got me blocked since I called him out for supporting Israel forcing birth control shots on black Ethiopian Jews, but jaypatriot is still pretending to not be a Trump supporter when he is a both-more articulate and more amoral defender of MAGA than even Mycroft, and defends the Admin’s actions to the hilt without fail no matter what they do.

 

[SCrider]

He said: "Trump says Bondi should release 'whatever she thinks is credible' on Epstein "Let them have it,".

What do you make of that statement? Does he mean it?

Trump says Bondi should release 'whatever she thinks is credible' on Epstein

President Donald Trump says Attorney General Pam Bondi should release "whatever she thinks is credible" on Jeffrey Epstein.

abcnews.go.com

Yeah, they will release anything that makes Trump look good and everyone else look bad.

 

[SCrider]

It is fun watching these MAGAs throw out any sense of morals they may have still had trying to defend Trump here.

 

[Fearandloathing]

Count me as one of those who has never cared about the Epstein files and still doesn't. If there was anything in there that could have been used for political purposes it would have come out a long, long time ago. At this point it is all stupid conspiracy/partisan nonsense.

Since Reagan I've pretty much considered everything in American news to be "entertainment" sans credibility.