Do you actually care about the Epstein files?

[Lord Tammerlain]

So why has no one been indicted?

The very rich and powerful have the ability to make things go away

 

[Lycanthrope]

This should be a bipartisan issue, period. The survivors of the abuse deserve justice. All the identities of the accused should be publicly released. If it was any other crime--hell even involving witnesses to crimes--they would be publicly named in documents that are never sealed to begin with. This kind of privilege for the accused has no place in our country and court system.

Agreed, but sadly that privilege exists nevertheless.

 

[Hamish Howl]

Other: Yes. I want everyone on the list in prison and on the sex offender registry. No exceptions.

 

[Mika-El]

Wow. Where was this grandstanding and virtue signaling over the last 4 years? But thank you for joining the long list of leftists who dont care about the victims of Epsteins crimes but are only interested because they think they can nail Trump somehow.

Wrong.

1. My posts from the very go way back when Epstein was first arrested and Pam Bondi as Florida AG let him go scott free called for proper disclosure and investigation and I have consistently stated from the get go anyone party to his sordid network regardless of who they are needs to be investigated.

2. I am not a leftist.

3. The issue is not left or right it has to do with full disclosure of the evidence which is not just about Trump.

4. I am not grandstanding and in fact you are trying to protect Trump as if this issue only deals with "attacking him".

Don't pull that crap with me and smear me or anyone else as only wanting to pick on Trump. Your boy is no victim and neither are any of the others in the videos, documents and photos.

Try that its a leftist conspiracy on someone else. Its weak, its pathetic and it is a joke of a deflection.

 

[Mika-El]

I'm not sure why you would presume that. Think about how sloppily sensitive files were treated by both Biden and Trump. I doubt either one of them lugged those boxes of confidential files from their respective offices, into their cars, and then into their garages. They had helpers.

Lol you mean they are piled up in Pam's bathroom?

 

[NatMorton]

Lol you mean they are piled up in Pam's bathroom?

Perhaps pinned to the fridge with a magnet?

Seriously, our friends in Washington aren't nearly as competent as some seem people think. In my professional capacity I've seen the federal bureaucracy up close, and my god, it's a shite show.

 

[W_Heisenberg]

I didn't think about this issue much until the Trump administration tried to sweep everything under the rug.

Now I am suspicious and I think to myself, "What is Trump trying to hide?"

 

[NatMorton]

I didn't think about this issue much until the Trump administration tried to sweep everything under the rug.

Now I am suspicious and I think to myself, "What is Trump trying to hide?"

Well, if the list exists and is in the hands of the Trump administration, it was almost certainly in the hands of the Biden administration just seven months ago.

If it's being swept under the rug, both parties seem to have their hands on the broom handle.

 

[HumblePi]

If you are a wealthy former president, or presidential candidate, if you're the CEO of a prestigious well-known company, or CEO of a major U.S. bank, the same bank where Epstein kept millions of dollars of extortion money, how much money would it be worth to you to keep your name out of the Epstein files? To what lengths would you go, in order to prevent that from ever happening?

To me, this image, taken on Trump's trip to Saudi Arabia during his first term, is a metaphor for the men who control the world. The top 0.01% of global wealth, that's who controls it. This concentration of wealth translates to significant economic and political influence.

 

[NatMorton]

The far right: Biden and his crew hid Epstein's list because there are prominent Democrats on it!

The far left: Trump and his crew are protecting prominent Republicans by hiding that list!

(This may just be one of those rare occasions when both sets of partisan yahoos are correct.)

 

[Dans La Lune]

He said: "Trump says Bondi should release 'whatever she thinks is credible' on Epstein "Let them have it,".

What do you make of that statement? Does he mean it?

Trump says Bondi should release 'whatever she thinks is credible' on Epstein

President Donald Trump says Attorney General Pam Bondi should release "whatever she thinks is credible" on Jeffrey Epstein.

abcnews.go.com

lol

 

[Dans La Lune]

The far right: Biden and his crew hid Epstein's list because there are prominent Democrats on it!

The far left: Trump and his crew are protecting prominent Republicans by hiding that list!

(This may just be one of those rare occasions when both sets of partisan yahoos are correct.)

Progressives: Lets see the ****ing files and let the chips fall where they will. Notice that progressives are morally consistent, unlike the right-wing. That's the great thing about BEING progressive. We don't have moral or ideological issues with holding the powerful accountable. We are also statistically less likely to engage in sex crimes, just FYI.

 

[Pyrite]

Count me as one of those who has never cared about the Epstein files and still doesn't. If there was anything in there that could have been used for political purposes it would have come out a long, long time ago. At this point it is all stupid conspiracy/partisan nonsense.

I find this development interesting: it turns out trump is a member of Deep State.

 

[Hip octogenarian]

He said: "Trump says Bondi should release 'whatever she thinks is credible' on Epstein "Let them have it,".

What do you make of that statement? Does he mean it?

Trump says Bondi should release 'whatever she thinks is credible' on Epstein

President Donald Trump says Attorney General Pam Bondi should release "whatever she thinks is credible" on Jeffrey Epstein.

abcnews.go.com

Does Trump mean anything he says?

 

[HumblePi]

The far right: Biden and his crew hid Epstein's list because there are prominent Democrats on it!

The far left: Trump and his crew are protecting prominent Republicans by hiding that list!

(This may just be one of those rare occasions when both sets of partisan yahoos are correct.)

If there are prominent Democrats on that list, Trump be pissing himself in glee wanting to get that out to his MAGAts as fast as he could.

 

[NatMorton]

We don't have moral or ideological issues with holding the powerful accountable.

I'm sorry, how many times was Bill Clinton a keynote speaker at the DNC convention after he left office?

 

[MAGAnificent]

Count me as one of those who has never cared about the Epstein files and still doesn't. If there was anything in there that could have been used for political purposes it would have come out a long, long time ago. At this point it is all stupid conspiracy/partisan nonsense.

I think whatever can be released should be released. However, I agree that if there was anything damaging to either side, it would have been released long ago. Perhaps nothing more to come except further embarrassment to Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew.

 

[NatMorton]

If there are prominent Democrats on that list, Trump be pissing himself in glee wanting to get that out to his MAGAts as fast as he could.

And the reverse was true under Biden.

I think there are two scenarios: Epstein didn't keep a list (and I find that almost implausible) or there is a list, there are plenty of prominent names on both sides of that list, and the powerbrokers in Washington on both sides have made a deal.

Just imagine for a second the leverage that both the DNC and RNC has over their respective party donors who think they might be on that list. "Hey, I can only keep you out of the news if I can get/regain control in Washington ..."

 

[Dans La Lune]

I'm sorry, how many times was Bill Clinton a keynote speaker at the DNC convention after he left office?

Boy are you barking up the wrong tree, in the wrong park, on the wrong planet. You want to throw him in jail for sex crimes? Lets have at it.

 

[TheDoctorWasIn]

I care about watching MAGAs be humiliated by Trump and themselves.

So, in that sense, I care about the "Epstein files," because they represent one of the better examples of the above.

 

[HumblePi]

And the reverse was true under Biden.

I think there are two scenarios: Epstein didn't keep a list (and I find that almost implausible) or there is a list, there are plenty of prominent names on both sides of that list, and the powerbrokers in Washington on both sides have made a deal.

Just imagine for a second the leverage that both the DNC and RNC has over their respective party donors who think they might be on that list. "Hey, I can only keep you out of the news if I can get/regain control in Washington ..."

That’s why Citizens United should be repealed.
Voters have a right to know which wealthy special interests are spending big money to influence our votes and our government to rig the political system in their favor. Citizens United has made it easier for special interests like corporations and billionaires to funnel vast sums of money into our elections.

 

[NatMorton]

Boy are you barking up the wrong tree, in the wrong park, on the wrong planet. You want to throw him in jail for sex crimes? Lets have at it.

We were discussing morality, and the evidence of Clinton's low morals about how he treats women is every bit as damning as is the evidence against Trump.

 

[NatMorton]

That’s why Citizens United should be repealed.

Sorry, no, I prefer groups of people having first amendment protections, just like individuals do.

 

[Dans La Lune]

We were discussing morality, and the evidence of Clinton's low morals about how he treats women is every bit as damning as is the evidence against Trump.

Clinton ain't on my team. Got it now?

 

[TamleeB]

And the reverse was true under Biden.

I think there are two scenarios: Epstein didn't keep a list (and I find that almost implausible) or there is a list, there are plenty of prominent names on both sides of that list, and the powerbrokers in Washington on both sides have made a deal.

Just imagine for a second the leverage that both the DNC and RNC has over their respective party donors who think they might be on that list. "Hey, I can only keep you out of the news if I can get/regain control in Washington ..."

My guess is there are many well known names from both parties involved. Might be the only time they work together with their manipulation.